So the Left wing argument about these people losing everything have insurance....

[JustAGuy1]

" Section 43.02[5] addresses exclusions related to violent uprisings and armed hostilities. Sections 43.02[5][a]-[e] explain that for the "war" exclusion to apply, armed hostilities between two or more states or sovereign entities must be ongoing. Losses resulting from usurped power, insurrection, invasion, rebellion, and civil war are also typically excluded from coverage, see Sections 43.02[5][g]-. In contrast, as discussed in Section 43.02[5][f], losses resulting from domestic riot and civil commotion are generally covered. The unique problems presented by acts of terrorism are addressed in Section 43.02[5][j]. "
Of particular note.....

" Losses resulting from usurped power, insurrection, invasion, rebellion, and civil war are also typically excluded from coverage"

Legal Insights Blog

www.lexisnexis.com

You Progs are idiots.

 

[Shelzin]

" Section 43.02[5] addresses exclusions related to violent uprisings and armed hostilities. Sections 43.02[5][a]-[e] explain that for the "war" exclusion to apply, armed hostilities between two or more states or sovereign entities must be ongoing. Losses resulting from usurped power, insurrection, invasion, rebellion, and civil war are also typically excluded from coverage, see Sections 43.02[5][g]-. In contrast, as discussed in Section 43.02[5][f], losses resulting from domestic riot and civil commotion are generally covered. The unique problems presented by acts of terrorism are addressed in Section 43.02[5][j]. "
Of particular note.....

" Losses resulting from usurped power, insurrection, invasion, rebellion, and civil war are also typically excluded from coverage"

Legal Insights Blog

www.lexisnexis.com

You Progs are idiots.

It doesn't matter either way... If they continue to burn shit down, insurance rates go up in that region. Company isn't going to take a loss, so one of two things happen... Prices of the goods go up, or... No more business there.

Burning shit down hurts the people who actually live there either way. No winners. None.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

" Section 43.02[5] addresses exclusions related to violent uprisings and armed hostilities. Sections 43.02[5][a]-[e] explain that for the "war" exclusion to apply, armed hostilities between two or more states or sovereign entities must be ongoing. Losses resulting from usurped power, insurrection, invasion, rebellion, and civil war are also typically excluded from coverage, see Sections 43.02[5][g]-. In contrast, as discussed in Section 43.02[5][f], losses resulting from domestic riot and civil commotion are generally covered. The unique problems presented by acts of terrorism are addressed in Section 43.02[5][j]. "
Of particular note.....

" Losses resulting from usurped power, insurrection, invasion, rebellion, and civil war are also typically excluded from coverage"

Legal Insights Blog

www.lexisnexis.com

You Progs are idiots.

It doesn't matter either way... If they continue to burn shit down, insurance rates go up in that region. Company isn't going to take a loss, so one of two things happen... Prices of the goods go up, or... No more business there.

Burning shit down hurts the people who actually live there either way. No winners. None.

Which of course is why they have to bring in the rioters from other cities.
Most people aren't dumb enough to destroy their own communities.....note: Most people.

 

[Shelzin]

Which of course is why they have to bring in the rioters from other cities.
Most people aren't dumb enough to destroy their own communities.....note: Most people.

Yeah, they did that here in Iowa... They bused in one day bused out the next day. The BLM organizers aren't as stupid as I wish they were. They won't do the dirty deeds themselves, and they couldn't find enough morbidly socially retarded people here to do their work.

 

[Norman]

losses resulting from domestic riot and civil commotion are generally covered

Not that they aren't retarded and wrong - they are. Who the fuck stands for burning?