Perhaps the best test of alternate realities - clear video of the shooting

He must have hurt your "feels" when he dropped the "F" bomb, right poor MAGAT?

Silly sensitive boy. :abgg2q.jpg:
Nah he just showed what kind of wussy he is, otherwise supplementing his lack of manliness with curse words.

Remember the dipstick when he tried to soothe over BLM during the riots, and the BLM rioters ran him off the stage and chastised him as he made his way through the crowd ????? Rotflmbo 😂

Remember him dancing like a nerd from hell trying to be down wid it ?????? Rotflmbo 😂....

You can't make the idiocy up I tell ya.
 
If needed they can pursue the vehicle. Again, this is not a felony stop.
So, he's going to make that decision in the milliseconds after she tried to kill him? Yeah, right!

Back to the dishes Sink Worrier! The dinner rush is about to start and we're out of silverware!
 
Yeah but she was at fault for escaping detention, and striking him. That said, I do agree his was at least too quick with his weapon. As having done some law enforcement myself, good chance I'm not pulling that trigger.

That said, while maybe the officer fucked up standing in front of the car, in a snap decision, how are you supposed to know the gal isn't trying to run you over when her actions are exactly that? Neat, the tires were slightly right, who the **** cares when she wasn't stopping, and he can't see the tires anyway. All he knows that the gal struck him during escape, and it wasn't an accident. Stupid yes, accident no - but you know, Renee was just having fun.
Even as the vehicle hits you? What if that was a reflex to being hit, so he instinctively continued shooting?
 
3 shots were fired. The 1st round went into the front windshield from an angle rather than from the front of the car. There was only one bullet hole in the windshield, so the last 2 rounds were fired from the side of the car after it went by the shooter, meaning that he ain't in any imminent danger at that point. Forensics will tell us which of those 3 shots were fatal, BUT I believe the shooter is responsible for all 3 shots. I seriously do not believe the shooter was in imminent danger of death or serious injury to begin with, but especially not the last 2 shots and if one of them was the fatal shot then he could be charged with a homicide to some degree.
Front corner of the car where he fired the first shot. It can be seen and heard in the video from his cell phone. Why do you not know this and make untrue statements? The hole is circular and not elliptical like an angled shot would be.
 
Here's the problem. Policy says he wasn't allowed to place himself in a situation where he could try to justify deadly force
Not what he done.... Do you have any proof of your BS ??? Nope, because you can't read minds.
 
Okay. This is from the DHS website. I don't believe a REASONABLE person saw her escape as attempted murder. I'm sure you disagree
Not exactly.

This is where you and I differ in approach. You don't believe that she was trying to murder the officer so to you that means that no one else could reasonably believe it.

I don't believe she was trying to murder him, either. But I allow for the fact that a reasonable LEO, being struck with an SUV by a driver who had expressed hostility to and willingness to interfere with law enforcement, could very reasonably believe that his life was in danger.

Can you honestly say that a reasonable person would not feel endangered by a woman driving an SUV into them?
However, deadly force is authorized to prevent the escape of a fleeing subject where the LEO has a reasonable belief that the subject poses a significant threat of death or serious physical harm to the LEO or others and such force is necessary to prevent escape.
The subject clearly posed a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer, other officers, and to others in the area.

I won't ask again why you truncated it. Your non-answer gives me the answer.

Your heroine of the week should have let her domineering wife do the protesting, while she took care of her kid before she lost custody of that one too.
 
Last edited:
Every husband has experienced this (okay not every husband, I guess):



After more than thirty-five years, I'm used to it. I know, and have always known, that if Mrs. Flops says "green." the instant the light turns green, I still have to make sure there is no oncoming driver running their red light, nor a pedestrian in the crosswalk, a cyclist who took a spill in the intersection or any other hazard. It is up to me to avoid that hazard, even when my beloved says "green."

But Ms. Good-riddance was no doubt used to being the little helper, not the driver, before she married a woman. Her own little helper said "drive baby drive!" but the responsibility was hers, and nobody else's, to avoid hitting someone.
 
She tried to maneuver around the officers and their vehicles. One cop would have none of it and shot her dead.

I don't know why they were after her. Did she hit someone before this video begins? But I do know the the officer was recently drug 50 feet down the street and was hospitalized in another incident.

They were after her because she was impeding their jobs. She was parked in the road blocking them. She was breaking the law and they were trying to take her into custody.
 
Nah he just showed what kind of wussy he is, otherwise supplementing his lack of manliness with curse words.

Remember the dipstick when he tried to soothe over BLM during the riots, and the BLM rioters ran him off the stage and chastised him as he made his way through the crowd ????? Rotflmbo 😂

Remember him dancing like a nerd from hell trying to be down wid it ?????? Rotflmbo 😂....

You can't make the idiocy up I tell ya.
You mean like Trump who uses curse words at speeches or when he goes into one one of his tirades on the phone with Republican who don't do his bidding?

Like Commander Bonespurs?
 
They were after her because she was impeding their jobs. She was parked in the road blocking them. She was breaking the law and they were trying to take her into custody.
She was an American doing moonbat shit, not a foreigner doing terrorist shit.

SCOTUS has spoken clearly. You cannot use deadly force in this situation. Cops know that.

He crossed a line, not only of my moral sensibilities, but also of legal precedent.
 
Last edited:
You mean like Trump who uses curse words at speeches or when he goes into one one of his tirades on the phone with Republican who don't do his bidding?

Like Commander Bonespurs?

Like draft dodger Clinton? Obama? Neither of those served, either. You might not want to open up that can of worms.
 
After he shot once through the windshield. Why do you liberals lie about something so easily seen in the photos and videos?
What you assholes are doing by justifying this is giving license to Trump's ICE goon squad to shoot protesters because they know Trump & his DOJ lackeys will back them up.

MOVE TO MOSCOW.
 
Haha, yeah, I know your one intellectual skill is lying to yourself out loud. because trump turned your intellect and ethics to diarrhea.
Many Progs have a good ability to spew the garage. They do it well. In recent years though they have gone ghetto in language. Donald Trump speaks like a New Yorker on the streets. And he has a sense of humor which you do not recognize. No matter how he acts, you are going to condemn him.
 
15th post
She was mad at ICE, was probably lying when she said she wasn't mad at him, and she was a ******* *****. So, you're saying that if an ICE agent steps in front of your car to prevent you from leaving the scene after refusing orders to get out of your car, you are free to run them over?
Standing front of a car is totally against DHS policy...

They had no right to ask her to get of the car and had no atrocity to do so... She had already let ICE vehicles pass...

The officer first broke policy by standing in front of the car...

She attempted to get out of the way and turned her wheel away from him...

Also two of the shots fired are at best as firing on a person fleeing. He wasn't the way of the car. That is against the law...

Ye have been watching too much movies... Officer can't shoot at a car which is fleeing... Ever think why cops are shooting at car in the news like they do in the movies?
 
She was a profoundly broken toy in a number of ways

In a past life she might have planted nails in the woods to discourage logging

Or broken into and trashed a research lab to save the rats

She has two other children that were taken away from her

I would like to hear the facts about that
You seem to want to justify executing someone on the street spreading lies about them...

That is all you got... False stories to spread... You are not happy with the execution, now you want to destroy their family with lies...

That is shameful..
 
Many Progs have a good ability to spew the garage. They do it well. In recent years though they have gone ghetto in language. Donald Trump speaks like a New Yorker on the streets. And he has a sense of humor which you do not recognize. No matter how he acts, you are going to condemn him.
Nope...

Trump isn't the problem... IT is the false narrative that he any way represents good, never mind a champion of it...

There will always be Trumps in the world, snake oil sales guys who will tell you what you want to hear...

The problem is the ones who believe him and let him do this...
 
Back
Top Bottom