Carl in Michigan
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 64,754
- 49,577
- 3,615
"Has a reasonable ...."View attachment 1204386
What is the rest of that sentence that I underlined, and why did you truncate it?
A reasonable WHAT?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Has a reasonable ...."View attachment 1204386
What is the rest of that sentence that I underlined, and why did you truncate it?
At least you admit you support attempted murder of law enforcement.I don't care if her car hit him. Like, at all. He switched hands with his cell phone to get in front of her car and reach for his gun. He should not have done that, nor did he even attempt to get out of the way.
He was itching to shoot someone. Clear as day.
Now some people need to pay the price.
^Announces he avoids reality like it was a job^Nah, not interested, freak.
But we can talk about how you Rape daddy's political slush funds funded the insurrectionists on Jan 6, if you like.
Seriously? Have you heard the comments if that Cuck Mayor and Tampon Tim?At a time when any other administration -- Republican or Democrat -- would be calling for calm, this one is going out of its way to stoke the flames. As it does every single goddamn chance it gets.
Every single public comment is just another hyperpartisan campaign stump speech. These people know what they're causing, and they're just fine with it. And as always, the rubes think it's real cool.
I'm asking YOU. You posted it."Has a reasonable ...."
A reasonable WHAT?
That doesn’t mean it’s ok for her to hit him with her car. Those procedures/best practices are in place to hopefully mitigate the risk that a loon will try and hit LEO with their vehicles. They dont remove that risk nor do they remove the responsibility of the loon of their actions if they aren’t followed.There's another clip of the incident from an entirely different standpoint that shows there was contact. But nevertheless, he put himself in front of a vehicle and stayed there when he didn't have to, and did other things wrong too, as this retired agent with 25 years experience including in the investigative arm of ICE/DHS explains:
View attachment 1204235
:
That doesn’t mean it’s ok for her to hit him with her car. Those procedures/best practices are in place to hopefully mitigate the risk that a loon will try and hit LEO with their vehicles. They dont remove that risk nor do they remove the responsibility of the loon of their actions if they aren’t followed.
He must have hurt your "feels" when he dropped the "F" bomb, right poor MAGAT?Seriously? Have you heard the comments if that Cuck Mayor and Tampon Tim?
You are such a clown.

Let’s meet in a parking lot. I’ll hand you my gun and you can go stand 15 feet away from my truck. I’ll get in my truck and floor the accelerator and race my truck toward you. I may or may not turn my wheels away from you while I hit you with my truck. You can choose to defend yourself or hope I don’t choose to steer into you.As I said in previous posts, she turned the wheel and her tires were going to the right, so I think it's clear she was just trying to get the hell out of there, not purposely hit him.
Okay. This is from the DHS website. I don't believe a REASONABLE person saw her escape as attempted murder. I'm sure you disagreeI'm asking YOU. You posted it.
Here's the problem. Policy says he wasn't allowed to place himself in a situation where he could try to justify deadly forceLet’s meet in a parking lot. I’ll hand you my gun and you can go stand 15 feet away from my truck
You don’t get to hit a person LEO or otherwise with your car just because they were standing in front of it. This woman was interfering with the duties of LEO on purpose as an act of protest which is illegal. She then ignored a lawful order from LEO also illegal. She then attempted to flee the scene (illegal) and then hit a ma with her car which is felony assault at a minimum. It was a tragic incident and I’m sure the officer wishes he didn’t kill her but acting like she doesn’t own the majority of the blame for her own death is just ******* crazy.Here's the problem. Policy says he wasn't allowed to place himself in a situation where he could try to justify deadly force
At a time when any other administration -- Republican or Democrat -- would be calling for calm, this one is going out of its way to stoke the flames. As it does every single goddamn chance it gets.
Every single public comment is just another hyperpartisan campaign stump speech. These people know what they're causing, and they're just fine with it. And as always, the rubes think it's real cool.

That is because you are not very bright!He was not run over, but it looks to me that there was bodily contact with the car. I would think a better approach would have been to shoot the tires, instead, but that's just me.
As to the op, what Mac is doing is to attempt to establish that a wider percentage of Americans support Democrat extremism than actually exists. He has created a world where it is "MAGA" on one side of the issue and everybody else on the other. This is simply not true.
"alternate reality", indeed.
She didn't give them a chance to let them leave because she disobeyed instructions, ran and hit him. What was the "wife" she left behind going to do? Ask ICE for a ride?Yep. One the guys had her license plate on video. Easy arrest. And it could have been done later if not then.
ObviouslyAs I said in previous posts, she turned the wheel and her tires were going to the right, so I think it's clear she was just trying to get the hell out of there, not purposely hit him.
Do bullet holes in the windshield magically appear? So, he was going to stop shooting because he missed? Please tell me that you were never in a combat situation and thought that! How long does it take to fire 3 rounds?Neither are you or anyone else. Here's the facts: the shooter did not fire through the windshield, he fired through the driver's window as the car was passing by him. At that instance, he was not in imminent danger of being hit and he was not being dragged when he opened fire.
Their chance to leave came before they went outside their parking meter cop mandate and ganged up on her.She didn't give them a chance to let them leave because she disobeyed instructions, ran and hit him.
Her political preference was why she was there in the first place. Would she be dead if she minded her own business and stayed home?What the woman's sex, or political preference was has no bearing on the situation.
SHE IS DEAD. The question is did she deserve to DIE over this dispute.
Is this the kind of response we want to be common from enforcement officers here in America ?
False!Here's the problem. Policy says he wasn't allowed to place himself in a situation where he could try to justify deadly force