Perhaps the best test of alternate realities - clear video of the shooting

I don't care if her car hit him. Like, at all. He switched hands with his cell phone to get in front of her car and reach for his gun. He should not have done that, nor did he even attempt to get out of the way.

He was itching to shoot someone. Clear as day.

Now some people need to pay the price.
At least you admit you support attempted murder of law enforcement.

Link us up to your evidence of ‘itching”, Kreskin.
 
At a time when any other administration -- Republican or Democrat -- would be calling for calm, this one is going out of its way to stoke the flames. As it does every single goddamn chance it gets.

Every single public comment is just another hyperpartisan campaign stump speech. These people know what they're causing, and they're just fine with it. And as always, the rubes think it's real cool.
Seriously? Have you heard the comments if that Cuck Mayor and Tampon Tim?

You are such a clown.
 
There's another clip of the incident from an entirely different standpoint that shows there was contact. But nevertheless, he put himself in front of a vehicle and stayed there when he didn't have to, and did other things wrong too, as this retired agent with 25 years experience including in the investigative arm of ICE/DHS explains:

View attachment 1204235
:
That doesn’t mean it’s ok for her to hit him with her car. Those procedures/best practices are in place to hopefully mitigate the risk that a loon will try and hit LEO with their vehicles. They dont remove that risk nor do they remove the responsibility of the loon of their actions if they aren’t followed.
 
That doesn’t mean it’s ok for her to hit him with her car. Those procedures/best practices are in place to hopefully mitigate the risk that a loon will try and hit LEO with their vehicles. They dont remove that risk nor do they remove the responsibility of the loon of their actions if they aren’t followed.

As I said in previous posts, she turned the wheel and her tires were going to the right, so I think it's clear she was just trying to get the hell out of there, not purposely hit him.

And I know what the response to that will be...."he might not have known that." He purposely placed himself where he was (to try to stop her from leaving.) He saw the situation unfolding beforehand, but he still went toward her car, which is against their own policy. If he truly thought his life was in danger he wouldn't have done that, he would have gotten out of the way.
 
Last edited:
Seriously? Have you heard the comments if that Cuck Mayor and Tampon Tim?

You are such a clown.
He must have hurt your "feels" when he dropped the "F" bomb, right poor MAGAT?

Silly sensitive boy. :abgg2q.jpg:
 
As I said in previous posts, she turned the wheel and her tires were going to the right, so I think it's clear she was just trying to get the hell out of there, not purposely hit him.
Let’s meet in a parking lot. I’ll hand you my gun and you can go stand 15 feet away from my truck. I’ll get in my truck and floor the accelerator and race my truck toward you. I may or may not turn my wheels away from you while I hit you with my truck. You can choose to defend yourself or hope I don’t choose to steer into you.
 
I'm asking YOU. You posted it.
Okay. This is from the DHS website. I don't believe a REASONABLE person saw her escape as attempted murder. I'm sure you disagree

However, deadly force is authorized to prevent the escape of a fleeing subject where the LEO has a reasonable belief that the subject poses a significant threat of death or serious physical harm to the LEO or others and such force is necessary to prevent escape.
 
Here's the problem. Policy says he wasn't allowed to place himself in a situation where he could try to justify deadly force
You don’t get to hit a person LEO or otherwise with your car just because they were standing in front of it. This woman was interfering with the duties of LEO on purpose as an act of protest which is illegal. She then ignored a lawful order from LEO also illegal. She then attempted to flee the scene (illegal) and then hit a ma with her car which is felony assault at a minimum. It was a tragic incident and I’m sure the officer wishes he didn’t kill her but acting like she doesn’t own the majority of the blame for her own death is just ******* crazy.
 
At a time when any other administration -- Republican or Democrat -- would be calling for calm, this one is going out of its way to stoke the flames. As it does every single goddamn chance it gets.

Every single public comment is just another hyperpartisan campaign stump speech. These people know what they're causing, and they're just fine with it. And as always, the rubes think it's real cool.

Let's all work together to get the illegals out of our country. :huddle:
 
He was not run over, but it looks to me that there was bodily contact with the car. I would think a better approach would have been to shoot the tires, instead, but that's just me.

As to the op, what Mac is doing is to attempt to establish that a wider percentage of Americans support Democrat extremism than actually exists. He has created a world where it is "MAGA" on one side of the issue and everybody else on the other. This is simply not true.


"alternate reality", indeed.
That is because you are not very bright!
 
As I said in previous posts, she turned the wheel and her tires were going to the right, so I think it's clear she was just trying to get the hell out of there, not purposely hit him.
Obviously

But he already had his gun out, hoping to shoot her.
 
15th post
Neither are you or anyone else. Here's the facts: the shooter did not fire through the windshield, he fired through the driver's window as the car was passing by him. At that instance, he was not in imminent danger of being hit and he was not being dragged when he opened fire.
Do bullet holes in the windshield magically appear? So, he was going to stop shooting because he missed? Please tell me that you were never in a combat situation and thought that! How long does it take to fire 3 rounds?
 
What the woman's sex, or political preference was has no bearing on the situation.
SHE IS DEAD. The question is did she deserve to DIE over this dispute.
Is this the kind of response we want to be common from enforcement officers here in America ?
Her political preference was why she was there in the first place. Would she be dead if she minded her own business and stayed home?
 
Back
Top Bottom