The list of names is truly overwhelming. Most of the names are fictitious names inserted into the voter rolls by nameless people who control the software companies that control voter rolls. Those nameless ones are protected by several layers of the state bureaucracy. The voter roll names mysteriously disappear after the election, as proven by independent canvassers in several states. This we have proven and can prove beyond any reasonable doubt. Your request for a "court" investigation is baseless because the courts have no jurisdiction, let alone investigative capacity, in this civil matter. Only the legislatures who appointed the software companies, to begin with, have the jurisdiction to delve into this matter. No legislature would be stupid enough to incriminate themselves to that level.
The "facts" I was referring to have nothing to do with this. What I was talking about was your misquoting of Pennsylvania's Act 77 in your earlier post. You're too lazy to read what that bill actually says, but instead, make some outlandish claim that the bill somehow makes fraudulent voter roll manipulation and ballot harvesting ok. The majority of the act was clearly intended to tighten security and increase voting integrity. The one thing they got wrong was to expand mail-in voting, as evidenced by the court's decision that the Act violated the Pennsylvania constitution, which may have invalidated the election:
Breaking News and Information with a strong bias for telling the truth. Censored news and analysis that you won't find anywhere else.
www.newswars.com