jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 141,616
- 30,081
- 2,180
it's why no one from the DOJ has any interest, there is no evidence.Why not submit the note for handwriting analysis?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it's why no one from the DOJ has any interest, there is no evidence.Why not submit the note for handwriting analysis?
well it would all be inadmissible in a court. so it is useless information. All it's for is to show us how nuts the demofks really are and that the law of the land doesn't mean shit to them.Ms. Hutchinson didn't make any incriminating testimony at all, there is nothing to "refute".
She gave double hearsay testimony, nothing that proves anything.
Its really up to the libs to prove their case, not up to the Little Trumpsters to prove their innocence.
The job of the secret service is to protect the president, up to and including covering his ass.
for what? Let's get it to court. you can have your immaterial fun all you want with the biased congress, it means absolutely nothing.When will trump's supporters step up under oath?
Believe what you want, she did deliver some very incriminating evidence. Trump knew protestors were armed, he didn't care, they were not there to hurt him. He even asked to remove the metal detectors, called MAGS. Trump didn't want to stop the protestors, even after knowing they had breeched the capital. Quoting Mark Meadows, "Trump doesn't want to do anything". Trump seemed to indicate support for the "Hang Mike Pence" chant.Ms. Hutchinson didn't make any incriminating testimony at all, there is nothing to "refute".
She gave double hearsay testimony, nothing that proves anything.
Its really up to the libs to prove their case, not up to the Little Trumpsters to prove their innocence.
People are in fact armed at times. No crime in knowing that and not reacting to it.Believe what you want, she did deliver some very incriminating evidence. Trump knew protestors were armed, he didn't care, they were not there to hurt him. He even asked to remove the metal detectors, called MAGS. Trump didn't want to stop the protestors, even after knowing they had breeched the capital. Quoting Mark Meadows, "Trump doesn't want to do anything". Trump seemed to indicate support for the "Hang Mike Pence" chant.
Hutchinson also revealed a stunning effort of White House insiders to cover their ass. The list of those asking for presidential pardons is growing longer by the day. Many of them knew what was going on was both morally wrong and illegal. Honestly, what bothers me most about those insiders, and many other Republicans, like McConnell, is their stunning lack of ethics, morality, and common decency. For these people, the ends justify the means. And quite honestly, the Trump supporters fit in that same boat. Had the rioters reached Pence, hung his ass, and stopped the certification, Trump and his supporters would be just fine with that. That is perhaps the saddest reflection on our society in the history of this country.
Furthermore, Hutchinson's testimony portrayed a petulant, childish, angry president who in no way conducted himself as a simple cub scout leader should, let alone a president. Flinging dinnerware against the wall, flipping over tables, jerking off the tablecloth, what a stunning lack of respect for the White House staff, and stunning lack of maturity for a grown man. And of course, that flinging included ketchup, what I like to call idiot sauce.
Funny how any sticking with the fat former guy is willing to testify under oath. I wonder why that is.
Schiff is an awful awful awful human being.
He claimed the Hunter Biden laptop was disinformation from the Kremlin.
Has he ever corrected his lie?
The job of the secret service is to protect the president, up to and including covering his ass.
She has little to fear from committing perjury as long as the Deep State lawyers decide not to prosecuteFunny how any sticking with the fat former guy is willing to testify under oath. I wonder why that is.
The Whitehouse lawyer states the note is a fake. lol... Nothing this woman has stated is true. How long did Adam Schiff prep her for this?
It would take me about a minute to decide during inspection...All we need is a sample of this bitch's handwriting and a copy of the submitted note to tell whether she really wrote it or not.
lmaoWHY IS IT THAT YOU FUCK BOIS CAN'T FIND A CREDIBLE WEBSITE TO BACK UP YOUR LIES? NONE OF YOUR BULLSHIT LINKS EVER PASS A FACT CHECK TEST.
Was anything she said the truth? At this rate everything she claimed will be debunked by the end of today.
She claims she wrote a note that was actually written by a WH lawyer. This should be easy to verify.
It would take me about a minute to decide during inspection...