Pelosi Appoints 2nd GOP Critic Of trump To Jan. 6 Committee

[otto105]

I said nothing even resembling that.

Bah Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

 

[ThisIsMe]

Even if Pelosi had accepted all 5 McCarthy selections and we were forced to listen to Jordan babble and whine for his allotment of time you RWI’s would still cry that it was a partisan committee because rightfully there were more (D) than (R).

It will be a partisan committee because there isnt one unbiased or neutral member on the committee.

 

[otto105]

Hey you classless fuck, this is about Pisslosi rejecting any Republican who will ask REAL questions about Jan. 6. Not your flaring Stage 4 TDS. Now go back to the outhouse. That’s seems to be an appropriate place for you.

rep. Gym Jordan is a circus and he ain't coming to this town.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Under your theory Raskin voted "to stop the constitutional mandate."

Explain.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It will be a partisan committee because there isnt one unbiased or neutral member on the committee

Then i guess you will have to focus on the facts. We had a chance to have an independent commission, but the GOP shot that down.

 

[playtime]

Under your theory Raskin voted "to stop the constitutional mandate." But Nancy appointed him to her panel. So obviously that can't be the reason she kicked off Banks and Jordan off her panel. Want to try another reason?

raskin didn't go thru the hoops required to stop the certification. he only stood up & voiced his opinion. that's not the same as seeking out senators to sign on in writing & 4 senators did when the reps asked them to. of course raphael cruz gladly obliged as did 3 others.

 

[Dadoalex]

Hey you classless fuck, this is about Pisslosi rejecting any Republican who will ask REAL questions about Jan. 6. Not your flaring Stage 4 TDS. Now go back to the outhouse. That’s seems to be an appropriate place for you.

Please.
It's is ONLY about hiding the truth.

The question is not whether Pelosi should have had more security.
The question IS WHY they needed more security.
If these really are the noble patriotic Americans you claim them to be there shouldn't have been a need for more security
BUUUUUUUUT
If there were terrorists intent on staging a coup then more security was definitely needed.

Do you see? Your PRIMARY line of attack calls your own people terrorists.

Sorry I'm all finished for now.
You can go ahead with your dining out-house.

 

[Dadoalex]

What's "the truth?"

What is left when you discard what cannot be true.
In other words, all the Trump bullshit.

 

[playtime]

Why didn't they call Chief Sund to testify?

he did.

 

[Slade3200]

It’s been ‘political’ since the day of the rightwing terrorist attack.

And Pelosi knows that the facts of the attack make Trump and Republicans look bad; she also knows that to investigate the attack is perfectly appropriate and warranted, and is using that to her advantage.

Agreed, I’m just tired of the investigation games. It should be looked into. Do it and do it efficiently. If this turns into a Benghazi part 2 I might just puke all over myself

 

[ThisIsMe]

Kevin is scared to death of the truth. He know trump and his allies will be exposed as orchestrators of the insurrection attempt.

What truth? This is what the problem is. You claim to have the truth even before the committee has even started.

It usually works that the committee investigates, then the truth, hopefully, comes out. However, exactly like the impeachment trials, the left already has their "truth" in mind, so it doesn't matter what a committee finds, because, they, just like you, are already biased and have your minds made up.

Thats why this committee is a sham, and a waste of time and money. They are not looking for the truth, they already know they are going pin something on someone, this circus is just to find who they want to pin it on.

 

[Dadoalex]

Prove it, jackass.

Prove that you're a jackass? No need. You prove it with every post.

Clear as day.
Had the chance for bipartisan refused because he was covering up the truth.
Opposes House Panel because he's trying to cover up the truth
Appoint the two assclowns to deter finding the truth.
Threaten the two Pelosi appoints to keep them from pursuing the truth.

Now if there is no there there
Then why spend so much effort on keeping people from looking there?

 

[ThisIsMe]

It’s been ‘political’ since the day of the rightwing terrorist attack.

And Pelosi knows that the facts of the attack make Trump and Republicans look bad; she also knows that to investigate the attack is perfectly appropriate and warranted, and is using that to her advantage.

If Pelosi already knows the facts of the attack, why investigate?

 

[Rawley]

raskin didn't go thru the hoops required to stop the certification. he only stood up & voiced his opinion. that's not the same as seeking out senators to sign on in writing & 4 senators did when the reps asked them to. of course raphael cruz gladly obliged as did 3 others.

??? He put his objection in writing, and tried to get Senators to join him. And yet Nancy chose him for her panel. So, again, that can't be reason she kicked off Jordan and Banks.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What truth? This is what the problem is. You claim to have the truth even before the committee has even started.

What truth? Okay, for starters:

1) Who told people where congressmembers' private offices were?

2) Why were banned tours given to rioters the previous day? Who gave them?

3) How much talk was there before the fact implying some people knew it would happen?

4) What was Trump doing and saying for the several hours of the riot before he spoke to the nation?

5) Why did Trump tell the crowd hewould march with them (he actually also said "we"), and instead went to a TV to watch them?

6) who removed the panic buttons, and why?

7) why was help denied to the congress, when they pleaded for it?

Oh there's more...

 

[martybegan]

Looks like Pelosi is moving forward with her select committee.

Adam Kinzinger will be on the committee.

Pelosi only needs to appoint one more republican.

The committee is supposed to start their work next week.

Pelosi appoints 2nd GOP critic of Trump to Jan. 6 committee

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Sunday named a second Republican critic of Donald Trump, Rep. Adam Kinzinger, to a special committee investigating the Capitol riot and pledged that the Democratic-majority panel will “get to the truth.” Kinzinger said he “humbly accepted” the appointment even as...

www.aol.com

Hack likes a hack committee created by hacks.

Go back to your hole.

 

[playtime]

If Pelosi already knows the facts of the attack, why investigate?

so those that watch rw spinTV will know the facts as well.

 

[Rawley]

he did.

THe hearings starts tomorrow. Sund will not testify. Nancy had him fired, after he proved he make six separate requests to Nancy's guy in the House for the National Guard. Doesn't that give you even a little pause?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

??? He put his objection in writing, and tried to get Senators to join him. And yet Nancy chose him for her panel. So, again, that can't be reason she kicked off Jordan and Banks.

Well, and Jordan's continued, active participation in the Big Lie.

 

[Rawley]

What is left when you discard what cannot be true.
In other words, all the Trump bullshit.

So, Nancy's panel is all about Trump. Thanks for the honesty. The leaders in your party are trying to sell the charade that her panels is not about Trump.