Pelosi Appoints 2nd GOP Critic Of trump To Jan. 6 Committee

Pelosi used the same resolution for the Special Committee as Republicans used for the last Benghazi Investigation. Republicans are the ones who wrote that power into the Resolution not Pelosi.
True.

Republicans invented the use of Congressional investigations as a political weapon; they have only themselves to blame when the political weapon they created is used against them.
 
???? The 20th Amendment mandates that they vote FOR the certification? Then why do they even have a vote?

the 20th amendment says that a duly elected president is sworn in on jan 20 & the peaceful transfer of power takes place. in order for that to happen, the election gets certified in congress prior to jan 20th.

the trump humpers voted not to certify - therefore attempting to stop the constitutional mandate.

duh duh duh.
 
Feel free. So i can laugh at the weird shit you are about to make up, ya crybaby troll.
Now running from your own comments. No surprise. You’re a bitch who runs away as soon as any real proof debunking your shit gets posted you single digit IQ inbred. Now admitting it’s really YOU who needs to be spoon fed.
 
the 20th amendment says that a duly elected president is sworn in on jan 20 & the peaceful transfer of power takes place. in order for that to happen, the election gets certified in congress prior to jan 20th.

the trump humpers voted not to certify - therefore attempting to stop the constitutional mandate.

duh duh duh.
And Dims tried to vote not to certify in 2016 as soon as Alabama’s electoral votes came up. The first state alphabetically. They attempted to stop a constitutional mandate. They need to be arrested.
 
They do not believe it to be a lie. Look how many Democrats support open borders and transgender women playing sports vs biological women

only a few actually believe in the big lie. those are the Qanon nutters.

the rest are just trump humpers bent on loving trump, but scared shitless they will feel his wrath if they don't show their loyalty.
 
Because whether or not something is strictly illegal is not the only standard we hold in this country. If congresspeople were not only complicit but actively helping the capitol rioters intentionally or otherwise, we need to know. We need to know how this happened start to finish and how to keep it from happening again. We need to know if the threat still remains, and we need to know who is fueling it. The FBI can find fa tual info on this to give to the committee, and the committee is tasked with pulling that and all other info together into a bigger picture.
Yeah, but you'll never find any truth, the dems aren't looking for truth. They're looking for whatever Republicans they can nail to the wall.

This is no different than both impeachments, dems already have their mind made up, they just want to find people to make allegations against.

Tell you what, I'll do the work for them.... ready?

Trump
All of trumps cabinet
Trumps lawyers
Trumps kids
Any high profile and outspoken republican member of the senate or the house...

Bam! I've done all the work of this committee in 15 seconds, and saved the taxpayers millions of dollars!

You're welcome...
 
You do know that Jamie Raskin voted against certifying Trump's election, but he's on Nancy's panel.

raskin had no senators to back him up & it wasn't in writing - per the rules/law/guidelines permitted. so there is that.

& if kevin et al were so inclined to object to raskin or anybody else .... perhaps they shoulda looked at the long term repercussions in not voting for complete power & the picks being unchallenged.

they fucked up, now they get to stfu & watch the facts & truth come out.

starting with capital police testifying tomorrow how they were in deep shit on jan 6 & there will be new unseen body cam footage.
 
the 20th amendment says that a duly elected president is sworn in on jan 20 & the peaceful transfer of power takes place. in order for that to happen, the election gets certified in congress prior to jan 20th.

the trump humpers voted not to certify - therefore attempting to stop the constitutional mandate.

duh duh duh.
Under your theory Raskin voted "to stop the constitutional mandate." But Nancy appointed him to her panel. So obviously that can't be the reason she kicked off Banks and Jordan off her panel. Want to try another reason?
 
raskin had no senators to back him up & it wasn't in writing - per the rules/law/guidelines permitted. so there is that.

& if kevin et al were so inclined to object to raskin or anybody else .... perhaps they shoulda looked at the long term repercussions in not voting for complete power & the picks being unchallenged.

they fucked up, now they get to stfu & watch the facts & truth come out.

starting with capital police testifying tomorrow how they were in deep shit on jan 6 & there will be new unseen body cam footage.
Why didn't they call Chief Sund to testify?
 

Forum List

Back
Top