- Jan 19, 2010
- 67,636
- 61,907
- 3,605
Hey sugar plum....have you seen Joe's poll numbers today.....He is way below Trump....BuuuuuuahahahahahahahahhaahahhaFeel free. So i can laugh at the weird shit you are about to make up, ya crybaby troll.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hey sugar plum....have you seen Joe's poll numbers today.....He is way below Trump....BuuuuuuahahahahahahahahhaahahhaFeel free. So i can laugh at the weird shit you are about to make up, ya crybaby troll.
True.Pelosi used the same resolution for the Special Committee as Republicans used for the last Benghazi Investigation. Republicans are the ones who wrote that power into the Resolution not Pelosi.
???? The 20th Amendment mandates that they vote FOR the certification? Then why do they even have a vote?
Now running from your own comments. No surprise. You’re a bitch who runs away as soon as any real proof debunking your shit gets posted you single digit IQ inbred. Now admitting it’s really YOU who needs to be spoon fed.Feel free. So i can laugh at the weird shit you are about to make up, ya crybaby troll.
And Dims tried to vote not to certify in 2016 as soon as Alabama’s electoral votes came up. The first state alphabetically. They attempted to stop a constitutional mandate. They need to be arrested.the 20th amendment says that a duly elected president is sworn in on jan 20 & the peaceful transfer of power takes place. in order for that to happen, the election gets certified in congress prior to jan 20th.
the trump humpers voted not to certify - therefore attempting to stop the constitutional mandate.
duh duh duh.
They do not believe it to be a lie. Look how many Democrats support open borders and transgender women playing sports vs biological women
you so need to improve yer trolling skills. Have another bon bon.
This is a lie.They hold no such concern over any other law enforcement officers being named
You have deflected and name called again with no facts or evidence, just feelings
Are you suggesting that this committee is going to be totally unbiased and really look for the truth? Even all of the democrats? No?.....then the committee is a sham.It's not a sham committee....
Link?only a few actually believe in the big lie. those are the Qanon nutters.
the rest are just trump humpers bent on loving trump, but scared shitless they will feel his wrath if they don't show their loyalty.
You're a troll.This is a lie.
Never, in other words.As soon as you lobotmized retards shut your stupid little mouths about the Big Lie. Thanks for asking!
So? You make the error of thinking you are normal, and therefore everyone else must be a prostrate, lobotomized cultist like you. No. You are not normal.Hey sugar plum....have you seen Joe's poll numbers today.....He is way below Trump....Buuuuuuahahahahahahahahhaahahha
Well there you have it. By the way, the entire world outside of your nauseating cult is saying the same thing.Never, in other words.
Yeah, but you'll never find any truth, the dems aren't looking for truth. They're looking for whatever Republicans they can nail to the wall.Because whether or not something is strictly illegal is not the only standard we hold in this country. If congresspeople were not only complicit but actively helping the capitol rioters intentionally or otherwise, we need to know. We need to know how this happened start to finish and how to keep it from happening again. We need to know if the threat still remains, and we need to know who is fueling it. The FBI can find fa tual info on this to give to the committee, and the committee is tasked with pulling that and all other info together into a bigger picture.
You do know that Jamie Raskin voted against certifying Trump's election, but he's on Nancy's panel.
That's just your excuse you have prepared. This is the game McCarthy and the GOP is playing. And now you are a pawn in this game.Yeah, but you'll never find any truth, the dems aren't looking for truth.
WHAT????? HOW?????? are you nuts?.....
Under your theory Raskin voted "to stop the constitutional mandate." But Nancy appointed him to her panel. So obviously that can't be the reason she kicked off Banks and Jordan off her panel. Want to try another reason?the 20th amendment says that a duly elected president is sworn in on jan 20 & the peaceful transfer of power takes place. in order for that to happen, the election gets certified in congress prior to jan 20th.
the trump humpers voted not to certify - therefore attempting to stop the constitutional mandate.
duh duh duh.
Why didn't they call Chief Sund to testify?raskin had no senators to back him up & it wasn't in writing - per the rules/law/guidelines permitted. so there is that.
& if kevin et al were so inclined to object to raskin or anybody else .... perhaps they shoulda looked at the long term repercussions in not voting for complete power & the picks being unchallenged.
they fucked up, now they get to stfu & watch the facts & truth come out.
starting with capital police testifying tomorrow how they were in deep shit on jan 6 & there will be new unseen body cam footage.