It was a typo. You shouldn’t believe everything you read on the internet.
I don't.
Extra security was declined. No one thought that Trump supporters would really get so violent. The claim that Pelosi had anything to do with it is a lie.
The Chief of the Capitol Police wanted more security BEFORE Jan 6 and was denied.
Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots
The Sergeant at Arms of the House answers directly to the Speaker of the House.
Pelosi definitely caused the denial of extra security. She wanted turmoil to occur. The ***** has blood on her hands.
House Republicans on Monday called for Speaker Nancy Pelosi to answer “many important questions” about her “responsibility for the security” of the U.S. Capitol on January 6, when a pro-Trump mob stormed the building. Republicans on several committees sent Pelosi a letter asking why, among other...
news.yahoo.com
Republicans on several committees sent Pelosi a letter asking why, among other things, former Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund had his January 4 request for National Guard assistance rejected by former Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving, according to
Fox News.
Irving reportedly said he was concerned about “the optics” and didn’t feel the “intelligence supported it.”
“As you are aware, the Speaker of the House is not only the leader of the majority party, but also has enormous institutional responsibilities,” said the letter, written by House Administration Committee Ranking Member Rodney Davis, House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan, House Oversight Committee Ranking Member James Comer and House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes.
“The Speaker is responsible for all operational decisions made within the House,” the letter says, adding that Pelosi, her staff and an army of appointed House officials had kept a “very heavy-handed and tightly controlled approach to House operations” over the past two years.
“When then-Chief Sund made a request for national guard support on January 4th, why was that request denied?” the group wrote. “Did Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving get permission or instruction from your staff on January 4th prior to denying Chief Sund’s request for the national guard?”
The letter adds that on the day of the Capitol riots, Sund moved to notify the Sergeant at Arms of his request for national guard assistance and said it “took over an hour for his request to be approved because the SAA had to run the request up the chain of command.” That chain “undoubtedly included” Pelosi and her “designees,” the Republicans say.
They blast Pelosi for her “partisan” decision to “unilaterally” fire Irving and demand Sund’s resignation.
No one coerced anyone to break in. There’s tons of video showing just that. People breaking in through windows and trying to shove police out of the way. The idea that they were ushered into the Capitol is a lie. So is the idea that they were encouraged by liberals wearing anything “false”.
There are videos showing exactly that.
That's your opinion. Videos prove otherwise.