Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you didn’t know any better, judging by the universal conniption fit it provoked, you’d think the bill must have mandated that all homosexuals be drowned in the sea or deported to Mozambique. If that were the case, I’d understand why it worked dozens of billion dollar companies into such a fantastic tizzy. But, contrary to reports, that’s not what the bill was designed to do. Not exactly, anyway...In reality, the bill that the left called “horrific” and “heinous,” would have primarily accomplished the following:...-Protect a pastor from being forced to perform a gay wedding against his will....-Protect religious organizations from being forced to host gay weddings against their will....-Protect religious organizations from being forced to hire someone who opposes their fundamental tenets, beliefs, and goals....There you go. That’s all, folks. That was the whole bill, or at least the relevant portion. And it was narrower than that, in fact, because it provided loopholes and escape hatches where a court could still potentially punish an organization for “discriminating,” even if they fell into one of the above categories.
Stop being a fagPay Attention, Christians. They’re Coming After The Churches Now.
Not a christian,don't believe in christianity but thought this was a fascinating read. I save some articles while I was banned that were worth posting IMO.
First they want to shove objects into anus cavities..That's right! We gonna burn you out boy. You don't belong here no how.
“
The 14th Amendment jurisprudence of which Obergefell is the progeny applies solely to government, not to private persons or organizations.
.
“-Protect a pastor from being forced to perform a gay wedding against his will.
-Protect religious organizations from being forced to host gay weddings against their will.
-Protect religious organizations from being forced to hire someone who opposes their fundamental tenets, beliefs, and goals.”
Ignorant, bigoted idiocy.
The 14th Amendment jurisprudence of which Obergefell is the progeny applies solely to government, not to private persons or organizations.
Consequently, pastors and Christian churches were never in ‘jeopardy’ of being ‘compelled’ to accommodate same-sex couples.
The Georgia measure was unnecessary, unwarranted, and devoid of merit, nothing but rightist demagoguery and lies.
“-Protect a pastor from being forced to perform a gay wedding against his will.
-Protect religious organizations from being forced to host gay weddings against their will.
-Protect religious organizations from being forced to hire someone who opposes their fundamental tenets, beliefs, and goals.”
Ignorant, bigoted idiocy.
The 14th Amendment jurisprudence of which Obergefell is the progeny applies solely to government, not to private persons or organizations.
Consequently, pastors and Christian churches were never in ‘jeopardy’ of being ‘compelled’ to accommodate same-sex couples.
The Georgia measure was unnecessary, unwarranted, and devoid of merit, nothing but rightist demagoguery and lies.
“-Protect a pastor from being forced to perform a gay wedding against his will.
-Protect religious organizations from being forced to host gay weddings against their will.
-Protect religious organizations from being forced to hire someone who opposes their fundamental tenets, beliefs, and goals.”
Ignorant, bigoted idiocy.
The 14th Amendment jurisprudence of which Obergefell is the progeny applies solely to government, not to private persons or organizations.
Consequently, pastors and Christian churches were never in ‘jeopardy’ of being ‘compelled’ to accommodate same-sex couples.
The Georgia measure was unnecessary, unwarranted, and devoid of merit, nothing but rightist demagoguery and lies.
I tend to agree. I read the bill. I see nothing in it designed to protect religious freedom that isn't already protected federally.
“-Protect a pastor from being forced to perform a gay wedding against his will.
-Protect religious organizations from being forced to host gay weddings against their will.
-Protect religious organizations from being forced to hire someone who opposes their fundamental tenets, beliefs, and goals.”
Ignorant, bigoted idiocy.
The 14th Amendment jurisprudence of which Obergefell is the progeny applies solely to government, not to private persons or organizations.
Consequently, pastors and Christian churches were never in ‘jeopardy’ of being ‘compelled’ to accommodate same-sex couples.
The Georgia measure was unnecessary, unwarranted, and devoid of merit, nothing but rightist demagoguery and lies.
I tend to agree. I read the bill. I see nothing in it designed to protect religious freedom that isn't already protected federally.
Then if it isn't different than any federal law what is so wrong with it? It doesn't change anything.
Would this bill create a right for a Kim Davis to refuse to issue marriage licenses?
“-Protect a pastor from being forced to perform a gay wedding against his will.
-Protect religious organizations from being forced to host gay weddings against their will.
-Protect religious organizations from being forced to hire someone who opposes their fundamental tenets, beliefs, and goals.”
Ignorant, bigoted idiocy.
The 14th Amendment jurisprudence of which Obergefell is the progeny applies solely to government, not to private persons or organizations.
Consequently, pastors and Christian churches were never in ‘jeopardy’ of being ‘compelled’ to accommodate same-sex couples.
The Georgia measure was unnecessary, unwarranted, and devoid of merit, nothing but rightist demagoguery and lies.
I tend to agree. I read the bill. I see nothing in it designed to protect religious freedom that isn't already protected federally.
Then if it isn't different than any federal law what is so wrong with it? It doesn't change anything.
Redundant, unnecessary, superfluous, symbolism over substance, gratuitous, useless...
need more?
“-Protect a pastor from being forced to perform a gay wedding against his will.
-Protect religious organizations from being forced to host gay weddings against their will.
-Protect religious organizations from being forced to hire someone who opposes their fundamental tenets, beliefs, and goals.”
Ignorant, bigoted idiocy.
The 14th Amendment jurisprudence of which Obergefell is the progeny applies solely to government, not to private persons or organizations.
Consequently, pastors and Christian churches were never in ‘jeopardy’ of being ‘compelled’ to accommodate same-sex couples.
The Georgia measure was unnecessary, unwarranted, and devoid of merit, nothing but rightist demagoguery and lies.
I tend to agree. I read the bill. I see nothing in it designed to protect religious freedom that isn't already protected federally.
Then if it isn't different than any federal law what is so wrong with it? It doesn't change anything.
Redundant, unnecessary, superfluous, symbolism over substance, gratuitous, useless...
need more?
Why object to it if it is the same as the federal law unless you also object to the federal version of the law.
“-Protect a pastor from being forced to perform a gay wedding against his will.
-Protect religious organizations from being forced to host gay weddings against their will.
-Protect religious organizations from being forced to hire someone who opposes their fundamental tenets, beliefs, and goals.”
Ignorant, bigoted idiocy.
The 14th Amendment jurisprudence of which Obergefell is the progeny applies solely to government, not to private persons or organizations.
Consequently, pastors and Christian churches were never in ‘jeopardy’ of being ‘compelled’ to accommodate same-sex couples.
The Georgia measure was unnecessary, unwarranted, and devoid of merit, nothing but rightist demagoguery and lies.
