"Pogroms" are something which are now totally ignored in American public school history classes because they too closely resemble some of the crap the regime is pulling. You may have to find a very old dictionary to look it up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Pogroms" are something which are now totally ignored in American public school history classes because they too closely resemble some of the crap the regime is pulling. You may have to find a very old dictionary to look it up.
I apologize for mocking out a posting member.
I apologize for mocking out a posting member.
Why ?
Dottie just admitted she's not going to stay on this thread.
Her ass got handed to her and she turned and fled.
Krugman is a very wise man:
Unacceptable Realities
(snip)
The hysteria over Obamacare is being well documented, of course; Sahil Kapurs piece on Obamacare McCarthyism the instant purging of any Republican who offers any hint of accommodation to the law of the land is getting a lot of well-deserved attention. One thing Kapur doesnt emphasize, however, is what I see a lot in my inbox (and in my reading): the furious insistence that nothing resembling a government guarantee of health insurance can possibly work.
Thats a curious belief to hold, given the fact that every other advanced country has such a guarantee, and that we ourselves have a 45-year-old single-payer system for seniors that has worked pretty well all this time. But nothing makes these people as angry as the suggestion that Obamacare might actually prove workable.
Thats a curious belief to hold, given the fact that every other advanced country has such a guarantee, and that we ourselves have a 45-year-old single-payer system for seniors that has worked pretty well all this time. But nothing makes these people as angry as the suggestion that Obamacare might actually prove workable.
ummm..... the law has been active for..... oh..... say 10 days give or take Trajan Stay classy
A recent target is Rep. Jack Kingston, a Georgia Republican running for the Senate, who last week told a local radio station that it's not "responsible" to sit back and watch Obamacare "fall to pieces on its own." He was touting his bill to exempt more businesses from the law's requirement to provide insurance to employees.
The conservative pushback was merciless. "Jack Kingston has Surrendered on Obamacare," blared a headline on RedState.com, accusing the congressman of "[c]oming to terms with Obamacare" and insisting conservatives must not "acquiesce" to the law. One of Kingston's Republican opponents echoed the attack.
"links", follow them sometime This link was in the beginning, 2nd paragraph no less, of Krugman's article you rw drone:
The Rise Of Obamacare McCarthyism
A recent target is Rep. Jack Kingston, a Georgia Republican running for the Senate, who last week told a local radio station that it's not "responsible" to sit back and watch Obamacare "fall to pieces on its own." He was touting his bill to exempt more businesses from the law's requirement to provide insurance to employees.
The conservative pushback was merciless. "Jack Kingston has Surrendered on Obamacare," blared a headline on RedState.com, accusing the congressman of "[c]oming to terms with Obamacare" and insisting conservatives must not "acquiesce" to the law. One of Kingston's Republican opponents echoed the attack.
Oh it's there."links", follow them sometime This link was in the beginning, 2nd paragraph no less, of Krugman's article you rw drone:
The Rise Of Obamacare McCarthyism
A recent target is Rep. Jack Kingston, a Georgia Republican running for the Senate, who last week told a local radio station that it's not "responsible" to sit back and watch Obamacare "fall to pieces on its own." He was touting his bill to exempt more businesses from the law's requirement to provide insurance to employees.
The conservative pushback was merciless. "Jack Kingston has Surrendered on Obamacare," blared a headline on RedState.com, accusing the congressman of "[c]oming to terms with Obamacare" and insisting conservatives must not "acquiesce" to the law. One of Kingston's Republican opponents echoed the attack.
Um....sorry, your link there does nothing to support your claim...that quote is NOT in that link.
A recent target is Rep. Jack Kingston, a Georgia Republican running for the Senate, who last week told a local radio station that it's not "responsible" to sit back and watch Obamacare "fall to pieces on its own." He was touting his bill to exempt more businesses from the law's requirement to provide insurance to employees.
"A lot of conservatives say, 'Nah, let's just step back and let this thing fall to pieces on its own. But I don't think that's always the responsible thing to do," he said. "We need to be looking for things that improve health care overall for all of us. And if there is something in Obamacare, we need to know about it."
The conservative pushback was merciless. "Jack Kingston has Surrendered on Obamacare," blared a headline on RedState.com, accusing the congressman of "[c]oming to terms with Obamacare" and insisting conservatives must not "acquiesce" to the law. One of Kingston's Republican opponents echoed the attack.
Oh it's there."links", follow them sometime This link was in the beginning, 2nd paragraph no less, of Krugman's article you rw drone:
The Rise Of Obamacare McCarthyism
Um....sorry, your link there does nothing to support your claim...that quote is NOT in that link.
Dotty loves selective editing.
A recent target is Rep. Jack Kingston, a Georgia Republican running for the Senate, who last week told a local radio station that it's not "responsible" to sit back and watch Obamacare "fall to pieces on its own." He was touting his bill to exempt more businesses from the law's requirement to provide insurance to employees.
"A lot of conservatives say, 'Nah, let's just step back and let this thing fall to pieces on its own. But I don't think that's always the responsible thing to do," he said. "We need to be looking for things that improve health care overall for all of us. And if there is something in Obamacare, we need to know about it."
The conservative pushback was merciless. "Jack Kingston has Surrendered on Obamacare," blared a headline on RedState.com, accusing the congressman of "[c]oming to terms with Obamacare" and insisting conservatives must not "acquiesce" to the law. One of Kingston's Republican opponents echoed the attack.
Oh and the . lied, once again.
Krugman is a very wise man:
Unacceptable Realities
(snip)
The hysteria over Obamacare is being well documented, of course; Sahil Kapurs piece on Obamacare McCarthyism the instant purging of any Republican who offers any hint of accommodation to the law of the land is getting a lot of well-deserved attention. One thing Kapur doesnt emphasize, however, is what I see a lot in my inbox (and in my reading): the furious insistence that nothing resembling a government guarantee of health insurance can possibly work.
Thats a curious belief to hold, given the fact that every other advanced country has such a guarantee, and that we ourselves have a 45-year-old single-payer system for seniors that has worked pretty well all this time. But nothing makes these people as angry as the suggestion that Obamacare might actually prove workable.
If/when Heritagecare AKA Romneycare AKA- Obamacare works, some Repub's heads are going to explode
If/when Heritagecare AKA Romneycare AKA- Obamacare works, some Repub's heads are going to explode
So, what criteria would establish that the law "works"? Compliance? If everyone knuckles under and gives the insurance industry their pound of flesh, will Democrats call that a win?
It's call pure unadulterated rage.Krugman is a very wise man:
Unacceptable Realities
(snip)
The hysteria over Obamacare is being well documented, of course; Sahil Kapurs piece on Obamacare McCarthyism the instant purging of any Republican who offers any hint of accommodation to the law of the land is getting a lot of well-deserved attention. One thing Kapur doesnt emphasize, however, is what I see a lot in my inbox (and in my reading): the furious insistence that nothing resembling a government guarantee of health insurance can possibly work.
Thats a curious belief to hold, given the fact that every other advanced country has such a guarantee, and that we ourselves have a 45-year-old single-payer system for seniors that has worked pretty well all this time. But nothing makes these people as angry as the suggestion that Obamacare might actually prove workable.
They'll make up some fatuous and illiterate meme, like the one about unemployment checks being economically stimulating.If/when Heritagecare AKA Romneycare AKA- Obamacare works, some Repub's heads are going to explode
So, what criteria would establish that the law "works"? Compliance? If everyone knuckles under and gives the insurance industry their pound of flesh, will Democrats call that a win?