Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
how about working on honoring your wager? I'm done w/ you. Ignore list.
As to the OP, Krugman always has the keenest insight into rw malevolence.
Unacceptable Realities
(snip)
The hysteria over Obamacare is being well documented, of course; Sahil Kapur’s piece on “Obamacare McCarthyism” — the instant purging of any Republican who offers any hint of accommodation to the law of the land — is getting a lot of well-deserved attention. One thing Kapur doesn’t emphasize, however, is what I see a lot in my inbox (and in my reading): the furious insistence that nothing resembling a government guarantee of health insurance can possibly work.
That’s a curious belief to hold, given the fact that every other advanced country has such a guarantee, and that we ourselves have a 45-year-old single-payer system for seniors that has worked pretty well all this time. But nothing makes these people as angry as the suggestion that Obamacare might actually prove workable.
how about working on honoring your wager? I'm done w/ you. Ignore list.
As to the OP, Krugman always has the keenest insight into rw malevolence.
Unacceptable Realities
(snip)
The hysteria over Obamacare is being well documented, of course; Sahil Kapurs piece on Obamacare McCarthyism the instant purging of any Republican who offers any hint of accommodation to the law of the land is getting a lot of well-deserved attention. One thing Kapur doesnt emphasize, however, is what I see a lot in my inbox (and in my reading): the furious insistence that nothing resembling a government guarantee of health insurance can possibly work.
Thats a curious belief to hold, given the fact that every other advanced country has such a guarantee, and that we ourselves have a 45-year-old single-payer system for seniors that has worked pretty well all this time. But nothing makes these people as angry as the suggestion that Obamacare might actually prove workable.
Dot Com said:how about working on honoring your wager? I'm done w/ you. Ignore list
how about working on honoring your wager? I'm done w/ you. Ignore list.
As to the OP, Krugman always has the keenest insight into rw malevolence.
Unacceptable Realities
(snip)
The hysteria over Obamacare is being well documented, of course; Sahil Kapur’s piece on “Obamacare McCarthyism” — the instant purging of any Republican who offers any hint of accommodation to the law of the land — is getting a lot of well-deserved attention. One thing Kapur doesn’t emphasize, however, is what I see a lot in my inbox (and in my reading): the furious insistence that nothing resembling a government guarantee of health insurance can possibly work.
That’s a curious belief to hold, given the fact that every other advanced country has such a guarantee, and that we ourselves have a 45-year-old single-payer system for seniors that has worked pretty well all this time. But nothing makes these people as angry as the suggestion that Obamacare might actually prove workable.
how about working on honoring your wager? I'm done w/ you. Ignore list.
As to the OP, Krugman always has the keenest insight into rw malevolence.
Unacceptable Realities
(snip)
The hysteria over Obamacare is being well documented, of course; Sahil Kapur’s piece on “Obamacare McCarthyism” — the instant purging of any Republican who offers any hint of accommodation to the law of the land — is getting a lot of well-deserved attention. One thing Kapur doesn’t emphasize, however, is what I see a lot in my inbox (and in my reading): the furious insistence that nothing resembling a government guarantee of health insurance can possibly work.
That’s a curious belief to hold, given the fact that every other advanced country has such a guarantee, and that we ourselves have a 45-year-old single-payer system for seniors that has worked pretty well all this time. But nothing makes these people as angry as the suggestion that Obamacare might actually prove workable.
Dot Com said:how about working on honoring your wager? I'm done w/ you. Ignore list^^^Hypocrite who doesn't stay on topic demands others do^^^
Give the 2nd sentence a read IF you are able 
Its spot-on topic Missy. NOW will you & your friend stop derailing my thread? 
It's an interesting system but it does mandate that all employees pay 20% of their wages into the system and employers pay 13%. Employees do control how the funds they contribute are spent on their healthcare. The second part of the system is a safety new for serious health problems.Medicare for all is a reasonable alternative depending on how high the tax rate has to be support the huge influx into the system. If not possible Singapore's 3m system should be taken into consideration.
Jmo
And its going to get worse. For two months, thanks to the botched rollout, their delusions seemed confirmed by reality. Now that things are getting better, however, you can already see the rage building. Its not supposed to be this way therefore it cant be this way. If, as now seems highly likely, Obamacare has more or less achieved its enrollment goals by 2015, and costs remain reasonable, that wont be accepted there will be furious claims that its all a lie.
Paul further delineates the Right's delusions:
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/03/unacceptable-realities/
And it’s going to get worse. For two months, thanks to the botched rollout, their delusions seemed confirmed by reality. Now that things are getting better, however, you can already see the rage building. It’s not supposed to be this way — therefore it can’t be this way. If, as now seems highly likely, Obamacare has more or less achieved its enrollment goals by 2015, and costs remain reasonable, that won’t be accepted — there will be furious claims that it’s all a lie.
Discuss...
i like the idea of hitting Krugman on the head. Maybe even with a nail. Can that be managed?
how about working on honoring your wager? I'm done w/ you. Ignore list.
As to the OP, Krugman always has the keenest insight into rw malevolence.
Unacceptable Realities
(snip)
Dot Com said:how about working on honoring your wager? I'm done w/ you. Ignore list^^^Hypocrite who doesn't stay on topic demands others do^^^
ummm..... I see that you stopped at the 1st sentence of my reply
BTW- bolding and making your font size ginormous doesn't make your FAILderailing tactics any more credible
NOW- back to topic
Dot Com said:I see that you stopped at the 1st sentence of my reply- indeed I did! That's rho normal definition of an insult! You ASSume wrong.
When your bitterness shows up, I skim right past your posts.
The fact that dems worked w/ Repubs to fix their flawed bill & repubs are screaming bloody murder (the insurance co water-carriers that they are
Thats why Repubs are throwing anyone that attempts to work w/ Democrats to improve the LAW under the bus- the OP idiot.Gawd but you're a moron AND a welcher.
The real problem is that there is no fixing this bill with bipartisan support as long as Obama and his ideology is still in the WH. The only direction Obama wants to go as far as repairing this debacle is towards a single payer plan. He'll veto anything else. just sayin....
Good err.... uh..... opinion
So repubs will, sit on their hands until November
They haven't been sitting on their hands, everything gets shelved by Reid in the Senate.
Which isn't a topic, moron.
It is an assertion that you can't defend because it is no more than a prediction.
What does this asshole have to do with your so called topic. He's not even GOP.
The most impressive thing about this clip is that the GOP showed some reserve and didn't tell him to go f**k himself.
You really suck at this debate thing.
The fact that dems worked w/ Repubs to fix their flawed bill & repubs are screaming bloody murder (the insurance co water-carriers that they are
Thats why Repubs are throwing anyone that attempts to work w/ Democrats to improve the LAW under the bus- the OP idiot.
That's right, asshole. It isn't germain. It wasn't a GOP bill. It was cosponsored by plenty of dems. And most of us don't like that one too. So what is your point.
Two wrongs make a right.....got it !
Please provide evidence that the GOP are throwing people under the bus over this one. Since no GOP voted for it, I'll be curious to see.
Additionally, for you so called point to be valid you need to show us that the dems never throw anyone under the bus who does not get in rank and file.
You had 39 dems ready to throw the whole thing under the bus.
And you call me a moron. You are stupid. Just plain stupid. It's people like you that should be prevented from breeding.
So repubs will, sit on their hands until November
They haven't been sitting on their hands, everything gets shelved by Reid in the Senate.
ummm..... yeah
No links yet ?
SSDD
thanks for the thread-bump welchboi
As to the OP (lets try to stay on-topic eh?) Why is Repub leadership punishing rw members who might want to help fine tune the Heritagecare law just like Democrats helped fix/fine tune the repubs Medicare Part D roll out?
welchboi- I heard enough from you son. Go post on someone's thread that wants to hear your rw ravings
As opposed to your uninformed rants boy?
You do nothing but parrot the Obama Party Line, since he is liar so are you.
You don't know shit about it boy.....don't pretend you do.
OFF-TOPIC retards.Did you read the OP? I re-posted it for you here:
Krugman is a very wise man:
Unacceptable Realities
(snip)
The hysteria over Obamacare is being well documented, of course; Sahil Kapurs piece on Obamacare McCarthyism the instant purging of any Republican who offers any hint of accommodation to the law of the land is getting a lot of well-deserved attention. One thing Kapur doesnt emphasize, however, is what I see a lot in my inbox (and in my reading): the furious insistence that nothing resembling a government guarantee of health insurance can possibly work.
Thats a curious belief to hold, given the fact that every other advanced country has such a guarantee, and that we ourselves have a 45-year-old single-payer system for seniors that has worked pretty well all this time. But nothing makes these people as angry as the suggestion that Obamacare might actually prove workable.
OFF-TOPIC retards.
You've been asked to show which Repubs want to help and how they've been "purged".
Put up boy.
283 posts into this thread and Dottie is still AWOL on the fats.
^^^Hypocrite who doesn't stay on topic demands others do^^^
ummm..... I see that you stopped at the 1st sentence of my reply
BTW- bolding and making your font size ginormous doesn't make your FAILderailing tactics any more credible
NOW- back to topic
Dot Com said:I see that you stopped at the 1st sentence of my reply- indeed I did! That's rho normal definition of an insult! You ASSume wrong.
When your bitterness shows up, I skim right past your posts.
I read the whole topic which you trolled in it's entirety.
SOOOOOOO which troll topic would you prefer t start with?
BTW, you STILL haven't responded to my original on topic post, hypocrite.
Mabelle!!!
BTW- Krugman slam dunked it in his column
(thanks for the thread bump GF
Mabelle!!!
BTW- Krugman slam dunked it in his column
(thanks for the thread bump GF
A bump for dumbass Dottie and the sig line she's so proud of.
thanks welchboi
You know, if you'd simply honor your wager & start a fresh new acct. or have your rep zeroed, I'd let bygones be bygones. Otherwise, your just another welching rw'er
Won't need to be bumpin' this thread much longer mebelle60.
