Patton and Eisenhower would have beaten ISIL............

[LA RAM FAN]

It seems that a lot of Republicans currently think that our military is weak, has been decimated, and isn't being allowed to fight the terrorists.

They then say that Eisenhower or Patton would have been able to beat ISIL in a short amount of time.

Yeah.................but back in WWII, they weren't constrained by things like the Geneva Conventions, which came about AFTER WWII, because of all the really horrific things that had gone on, like the Dresden bombing (which was basically carpet bombing to get a few enemy at the cost of many innocent civilian lives).

But, RumsFAILED said back before the Iraq war that "you go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you wished you had".

And, the war that ISIL is fighting isn't anything like the conventional warfare of old, it's more like the guerrilla warfare that was done during Viet Nam.

Eisenhower,as in the man who was pals with Stalin and watched by his side when Stalin let his men rape women as i have posted the pic many times before?

glad you think its funny deltex that Ike stood right by stalins side and grinned with him as Stalins me raped women.man you're a sick human being. you would fit right in there with those two.

 

[Wyatt earp]

It seems that a lot of Republicans currently think that our military is weak, has been decimated, and isn't being allowed to fight the terrorists.

They then say that Eisenhower or Patton would have been able to beat ISIL in a short amount of time.

Yeah.................but back in WWII, they weren't constrained by things like the Geneva Conventions, which came about AFTER WWII, because of all the really horrific things that had gone on, like the Dresden bombing (which was basically carpet bombing to get a few enemy at the cost of many innocent civilian lives).

But, RumsFAILED said back before the Iraq war that "you go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you wished you had".

And, the war that ISIL is fighting isn't anything like the conventional warfare of old, it's more like the guerrilla warfare that was done during Viet Nam.

^^^^^^A typical libtard appologestic limp wristed pinko commie...of all the horrors and the crimes against humanity the japs and krauts inflected he just brings up Dreseden.

 

[RandallFlagg]

It seems that a lot of Republicans currently think that our military is weak, has been decimated, and isn't being allowed to fight the terrorists.

They then say that Eisenhower or Patton would have been able to beat ISIL in a short amount of time.

Yeah.................but back in WWII, they weren't constrained by things like the Geneva Conventions, which came about AFTER WWII, because of all the really horrific things that had gone on, like the Dresden bombing (which was basically carpet bombing to get a few enemy at the cost of many innocent civilian lives).

But, RumsFAILED said back before the Iraq war that "you go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you wished you had".

And, the war that ISIL is fighting isn't anything like the conventional warfare of old, it's more like the guerrilla warfare that was done during Viet Nam.

And what is your point EXACTLY?

I fought in Vietnam Nam. You? You see, we didn't lose that war because we couldn't kill the enemy. That was no problem. We lost the war because of jerk-off politicians who were too pussy to FIGHT.

Our military can win any conflict, any time IF THEY ARE ALLOWED TO.

If George Patton were alive today - and not constrained by the gutless politicians - they war would be over in six weeks.

You WIN a war by killing the enemy. NOT by placating them.

 

[JakeStarkey]

It seems that a lot of Republicans currently think that our military is weak, has been decimated, and isn't being allowed to fight the terrorists.

They then say that Eisenhower or Patton would have been able to beat ISIL in a short amount of time.

Yeah.................but back in WWII, they weren't constrained by things like the Geneva Conventions, which came about AFTER WWII, because of all the really horrific things that had gone on, like the Dresden bombing (which was basically carpet bombing to get a few enemy at the cost of many innocent civilian lives).

But, RumsFAILED said back before the Iraq war that "you go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you wished you had".

And, the war that ISIL is fighting isn't anything like the conventional warfare of old, it's more like the guerrilla warfare that was done during Viet Nam.

^^^^^^A typical libtard appologestic limp wristed pinko commie...of all the horrors and the crimes against humanity the japs and krauts inflected he just brings up Dreseden.

And you are a fool. He is right.

He is no commie, and you are no America hero or patriot.

 

[KingOfCars]

The recounting of revisionist history in this thread is laughable.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

I can just see the brass telling Patton he must allow women to fight on the front lines along side the men !

 

[JakeStarkey]

Boss, we would have had to invade and occupy and subdue North Vietnam.

One, we could not nuke it because the American people would have thrown the politicians out of office.

Two, we could not occupy and subdue North Vietnam because the American people would not have stood for the sacrifice of life and American treasure.

Three, we could count not on Red China staying out. We saw what the PLA did to our troops in 1950 and 1951. My stepfather was one of the Chosen Frozen who survived the march to the sea.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

It seems that a lot of Republicans currently think that our military is weak, has been decimated, and isn't being allowed to fight the terrorists.

They then say that Eisenhower or Patton would have been able to beat ISIL in a short amount of time.

Yeah.................but back in WWII, they weren't constrained by things like the Geneva Conventions, which came about AFTER WWII, because of all the really horrific things that had gone on, like the Dresden bombing (which was basically carpet bombing to get a few enemy at the cost of many innocent civilian lives).

But, RumsFAILED said back before the Iraq war that "you go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you wished you had".

And, the war that ISIL is fighting isn't anything like the conventional warfare of old, it's more like the guerrilla warfare that was done during Viet Nam.

Eisenhower,as in the man who was pals with Stalin and watched by his side when Stalin let his men rape women as i have posted the pic many times before?

incredible that you three trolls find it very funny that mass murderer Ike stood by stalins side and watched stalins men rape women.the fact you all think thats funny,wow,no wonder the world is evil with evil minded trolls like you three.jake is no surprise he is a paid shill on the governments pay roll.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

It seems that a lot of Republicans currently think that our military is weak, has been decimated, and isn't being allowed to fight the terrorists.

They then say that Eisenhower or Patton would have been able to beat ISIL in a short amount of time.

Yeah.................but back in WWII, they weren't constrained by things like the Geneva Conventions, which came about AFTER WWII, because of all the really horrific things that had gone on, like the Dresden bombing (which was basically carpet bombing to get a few enemy at the cost of many innocent civilian lives).

But, RumsFAILED said back before the Iraq war that "you go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you wished you had".

And, the war that ISIL is fighting isn't anything like the conventional warfare of old, it's more like the guerrilla warfare that was done during Viet Nam.

Eisenhower,as in the man who was pals with Stalin and watched by his side when Stalin let his men rape women as i have posted the pic many times before?

incredible that you three trolls find it very funny that mass murderer Ike stood by stalins side and watched stalins men rape women.the fact you all think thats funny,wow,no wonder the world is evil with evil minded trolls like you three.jake is no surprise he is a paid shill on the governments pay roll.

like i said,great you love watching men rape women pismoe,that just shows what kind of person you are.

 

[JakeStarkey]

9/11, your mind does not work well. You understand that, right?

 

[Katzndogz]

Hmmmmm.

No one should have stood by while Stalin's soviet army raped and brutalized German women.

The world had better stand by while Muslims rape and brutalize German women. Stopping that is racist.

 

[WillMunny]

Speaking of Patton, here's one of my favorite quotes: "May God have mercy on our enemies because I sure as hell won't." The Western world needs more real men born with ellipses between their legs called testicles.

 

[g5000]

When over half of your sorties come back with their payloads you're doing something wrong

It means the target personnel moved and you decided not to bomb innocent civilians for shits and grins, idiot.

 

[g5000]

When over half of your sorties come back with their payloads you're doing something wrong

Seems like they are being responsible in their choice of targets

Or afraid of collateral damage....are our enemies afraid of collateral damage? You can't win a war when one side has rules and the other one doesn't

We are the good guys

When you send brave men and women to war you let them do their job and don't tie one hand behind their backs. It's not fair to them and we lose good people because of it

I am one of those people, and you are full of shit. You need to stop talking out of your ignorant ass. You are quoting Hollywood movie bullshit, hack. Real life isn't like that. War is about a lot more than body counts. There are political and human realities which have to be taken into consideration.

Your stupid nativist armchair ignorance is getting really old, short bus.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Most of the people here that are calling for carpet bombing and such have probably never served a day in the military.

If they had, they'd see the error of their thinking.

 

[blackhawk]

Eisenhower and Pattons success and failure along with that of todays military commanders depends greatly on how much freedom the Commander in Chief gives them to fight the war. I think it's safe to say
Eisenhower and Patton had more freedom then than todays commanders do. To quote another WW2 General Douglas MacArthur it is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Or in MacArthur's case, make stupid decision on war plans, change your mind two weeks later, leave your rations where the Japanese can get them, let your troops rot and starve in the Bataan Penisula, and scarper off to Australia.

My father served under him, and he said that by the New Guinea fights, he had learned from his mistakes, particularly being taught by his subordinate air commanders how to use air power.

 

[RandallFlagg]

Hmmmmm.

No one should have stood by while Stalin's soviet army raped and brutalized German women.

The world had better stand by while Muslims rape and brutalize German women. Stopping that is racist.

Yeah right. Yet the world stood by while Germany killed millions of Jews in ovens and labor camps. Germany has been "over-compensating" to the world for that ever since.

 

[RandallFlagg]

Eisenhower and Pattons success and failure along with that of todays military commanders depends greatly on how much freedom the Commander in Chief gives them to fight the war. I think it's safe to say
Eisenhower and Patton had more freedom then than todays commanders do. To quote another WW2 General Douglas MacArthur it is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.

Indeed. Because in WWII - politicians kept their damned mouths SHUT and allowed the military to actually FIGHT wars. Any time a politician inserts him/herself into the equation - things go to hell.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Hmmmmm.

No one should have stood by while Stalin's soviet army raped and brutalized German women.

The world had better stand by while Muslims rape and brutalize German women. Stopping that is racist.

Yeah right. Yet the world stood by while Germany killed millions of Jews in ovens and labor camps. Germany has been "over-compensating" to the world for that ever since.

Really? The world stood by? What do you think WWII was about? Part of it was the persecution of the Jews by the Nazis.