Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Arab Palestinian Threat
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: A matter of perception...

WOW, a whole room of people pounding on the symptoms and not one looking at the problems.

(COMMENT)

Are → what you call symptoms - really the disease? I think you might have it backward.

When the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HAMAS) condemns Israel's participation in a security conference in Bahrain, is that really a symptom or is that the disease that causes the war to continue?

When Fatah says: "Murdering children is "legitimate human struggle" - when killer is Palestinian and victims are Israelis," is that not the symptom that causes the conflict to expand?

When PA officials say: "Jews have ‘no right to pray’ at Western Wall." Is that not a deliberate and inflammatory remark?

When Palestinian Arab Official Admits that “Killing Israelis is not Terror, it’s Legitimate,” is that not the incitement factor for hostile action?

The Palestinians do not opperate outside their own borders and they do not target Americans.

(COMMENT)

IF the Arab Palestinians THEN they are aggressively conduction operations against foreign sovereignty.

(Palestine borders are questionable. By no means are they a sovereign power. The question of whether or not they are a stand-alone government is up for debate.)

IF they claim that Israel is inside Palestine, THEN Palestine is in a state of a "Civil War" and not a foreign occupation. You cannot have it both ways. Either Israel is sovereign and its forces are not a foreign occupation, - or - Israel is sovereign and Hostile Arab Palestinian operations against Israel is an act of aggression.

In March 1978, a Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Jihadist (Fatah faction) Dalal Mughrabi killed the niece of Senator Abraham Ribicoff (D-Connecticut). And later on the same terrorist operation, they stopped and killed 24 adults and 12 children on the Coast Road bus. I mention is particular incident because JUST TODAY - the Hostile Arab Palestinians:

​

(June 15, 2020 / JNS) A music video aired on official Palestinian Authority television in June included images of terrorists, including Dalal Mughrabi, who together with others murdered 37 Israelis, among them 12 children, in 1978, according to an Israel-based media watchdog. ​

SOURCE: Veneration Video​

​

​

​

A Mail on Sunday investigation has found 24 schools named after Palestinian terrorists and evidence of widespread encouragement of violence against Israel by teachers, with terrorists routinely held up as heroes for schoolchildren.​

Pictures of ‘martyrs’ are posted on school walls, revolutionary slogans and symbols are painted on premises used by youngsters, sports events are named after teenage terrorists and children are encouraged to act out shooting Israeli soldiers in plays.​

SOURCE: Daily Mail​

​

​

Most Respectfully,
R

IF they claim that Israel is inside Palestine, THEN Palestine is in a state of a "Civil War" and not a foreign occupation.

The concept of Israel was foreign. The founders were foreign. The population was foreign. Its financing was foreign. Its political cover was foreign.

There is nothing "local" about Israel.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[rylah]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Arab Palestinian Threat
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: A matter of perception...

WOW, a whole room of people pounding on the symptoms and not one looking at the problems.

(COMMENT)

Are → what you call symptoms - really the disease? I think you might have it backward.

When the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HAMAS) condemns Israel's participation in a security conference in Bahrain, is that really a symptom or is that the disease that causes the war to continue?

When Fatah says: "Murdering children is "legitimate human struggle" - when killer is Palestinian and victims are Israelis," is that not the symptom that causes the conflict to expand?

When PA officials say: "Jews have ‘no right to pray’ at Western Wall." Is that not a deliberate and inflammatory remark?

When Palestinian Arab Official Admits that “Killing Israelis is not Terror, it’s Legitimate,” is that not the incitement factor for hostile action?

The Palestinians do not opperate outside their own borders and they do not target Americans.

(COMMENT)

IF the Arab Palestinians THEN they are aggressively conduction operations against foreign sovereignty.

(Palestine borders are questionable. By no means are they a sovereign power. The question of whether or not they are a stand-alone government is up for debate.)

IF they claim that Israel is inside Palestine, THEN Palestine is in a state of a "Civil War" and not a foreign occupation. You cannot have it both ways. Either Israel is sovereign and its forces are not a foreign occupation, - or - Israel is sovereign and Hostile Arab Palestinian operations against Israel is an act of aggression.

In March 1978, a Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Jihadist (Fatah faction) Dalal Mughrabi killed the niece of Senator Abraham Ribicoff (D-Connecticut). And later on the same terrorist operation, they stopped and killed 24 adults and 12 children on the Coast Road bus. I mention is particular incident because JUST TODAY - the Hostile Arab Palestinians:

​

(June 15, 2020 / JNS) A music video aired on official Palestinian Authority television in June included images of terrorists, including Dalal Mughrabi, who together with others murdered 37 Israelis, among them 12 children, in 1978, according to an Israel-based media watchdog. ​

SOURCE: Veneration Video​

​

​

​

A Mail on Sunday investigation has found 24 schools named after Palestinian terrorists and evidence of widespread encouragement of violence against Israel by teachers, with terrorists routinely held up as heroes for schoolchildren.​

Pictures of ‘martyrs’ are posted on school walls, revolutionary slogans and symbols are painted on premises used by youngsters, sports events are named after teenage terrorists and children are encouraged to act out shooting Israeli soldiers in plays.​

SOURCE: Daily Mail​

​

​

Most Respectfully,
R

IF they claim that Israel is inside Palestine, THEN Palestine is in a state of a "Civil War" and not a foreign occupation.

The concept of Israel was foreign. The founders were foreign. The population was foreign. Its financing was foreign. Its political cover was foreign.

There is nothing "local" about Israel.

Oh really?

Sorry to burst your bubble,
but was it foreign you were sayin'...

And if already discussing -

then what is "local" about Palestine,
if Israelis and Palestinians came from the same countries?

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Arab Palestinian Existence
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: A

Palestine's international borders were defined by post war treaties. They remain unchanged.

(COMMENT)

Well, This is just too much. You've been given the treaties that cover the overall territory. As far as Israel, the West Bank, and Jerusalem are concerned, the current treaty boundaries are defined by Posting #3518.

By no means are they a sovereign power. The question of whether or not they are a stand-alone government is up for debate.)

The people inside a defined territory have the right to sovereignty. Governments and states are products of sovereignty not prerequisites.

(COMMENT)

You get "Half Credit."

The Arab Palestinians do not have a single voice with an agreed-upon definition of the territory. The Arab Palestinians DO NOT have a State. In 1988, when the PLO declared independence - Israel already had control of the territories.

The "prerequisites" under international convention cites a state should possess the following qualifications:

​

a.	a permanent population;​
b.	a defined territory;​
c.	government; and​
d.	capacity to enter into relations with the other states.​

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Hollie]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Arab Palestinian Threat
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: A matter of perception...

WOW, a whole room of people pounding on the symptoms and not one looking at the problems.

(COMMENT)

Are → what you call symptoms - really the disease? I think you might have it backward.

When the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HAMAS) condemns Israel's participation in a security conference in Bahrain, is that really a symptom or is that the disease that causes the war to continue?

When Fatah says: "Murdering children is "legitimate human struggle" - when killer is Palestinian and victims are Israelis," is that not the symptom that causes the conflict to expand?

When PA officials say: "Jews have ‘no right to pray’ at Western Wall." Is that not a deliberate and inflammatory remark?

When Palestinian Arab Official Admits that “Killing Israelis is not Terror, it’s Legitimate,” is that not the incitement factor for hostile action?

The Palestinians do not opperate outside their own borders and they do not target Americans.

(COMMENT)

IF the Arab Palestinians THEN they are aggressively conduction operations against foreign sovereignty.

(Palestine borders are questionable. By no means are they a sovereign power. The question of whether or not they are a stand-alone government is up for debate.)

IF they claim that Israel is inside Palestine, THEN Palestine is in a state of a "Civil War" and not a foreign occupation. You cannot have it both ways. Either Israel is sovereign and its forces are not a foreign occupation, - or - Israel is sovereign and Hostile Arab Palestinian operations against Israel is an act of aggression.

In March 1978, a Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Jihadist (Fatah faction) Dalal Mughrabi killed the niece of Senator Abraham Ribicoff (D-Connecticut). And later on the same terrorist operation, they stopped and killed 24 adults and 12 children on the Coast Road bus. I mention is particular incident because JUST TODAY - the Hostile Arab Palestinians:

​

(June 15, 2020 / JNS) A music video aired on official Palestinian Authority television in June included images of terrorists, including Dalal Mughrabi, who together with others murdered 37 Israelis, among them 12 children, in 1978, according to an Israel-based media watchdog. ​

SOURCE: Veneration Video​

​

​

​

A Mail on Sunday investigation has found 24 schools named after Palestinian terrorists and evidence of widespread encouragement of violence against Israel by teachers, with terrorists routinely held up as heroes for schoolchildren.​

Pictures of ‘martyrs’ are posted on school walls, revolutionary slogans and symbols are painted on premises used by youngsters, sports events are named after teenage terrorists and children are encouraged to act out shooting Israeli soldiers in plays.​

SOURCE: Daily Mail​

​

​

Most Respectfully,
R

IF they claim that Israel is inside Palestine, THEN Palestine is in a state of a "Civil War" and not a foreign occupation.

The concept of Israel was foreign. The founders were foreign. The population was foreign. Its financing was foreign. Its political cover was foreign.

There is nothing "local" about Israel.

Jews were not ''local'' to the area of Palestine?

Your madrassah has played a cruel joke on you.

 

[Hollie]

WOW, a whole room of people pounding on the symptoms and not one looking at the problems.

The Palestinians do not opperate outside their own borders and they do not target Americans.

Wow. An echo chamber for Pally falsehoods.

You don't identify what borders are associated with the Pally terrorist syndicates so your comment rings hollow. Where are the borders that delineate the Islamic terrorist franchises occupying Gaza and the West Bank?

Secondly, to claim that pally terrorists don't target Americans displays ignorance on your part, because your Islamic terrorist heroes actually do target Americans.

American Victims of Terrorist Attacks

Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.

www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org

 

[Hollie]

Palestine's international borders were defined by post war treaties. They remain unchanged.

Your silly ''Treaty of Lausanne'' nonsense has been debunked dozens of times.

You never did supply the names of the ''new states'' you claimed existed. What are those ''new states''?

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Arab Palestinian Threat
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: A matter of perception...

WOW, a whole room of people pounding on the symptoms and not one looking at the problems.

(COMMENT)

Are → what you call symptoms - really the disease? I think you might have it backward.

When the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HAMAS) condemns Israel's participation in a security conference in Bahrain, is that really a symptom or is that the disease that causes the war to continue?

When Fatah says: "Murdering children is "legitimate human struggle" - when killer is Palestinian and victims are Israelis," is that not the symptom that causes the conflict to expand?

When PA officials say: "Jews have ‘no right to pray’ at Western Wall." Is that not a deliberate and inflammatory remark?

When Palestinian Arab Official Admits that “Killing Israelis is not Terror, it’s Legitimate,” is that not the incitement factor for hostile action?

The Palestinians do not opperate outside their own borders and they do not target Americans.

(COMMENT)

IF the Arab Palestinians THEN they are aggressively conduction operations against foreign sovereignty.

(Palestine borders are questionable. By no means are they a sovereign power. The question of whether or not they are a stand-alone government is up for debate.)

IF they claim that Israel is inside Palestine, THEN Palestine is in a state of a "Civil War" and not a foreign occupation. You cannot have it both ways. Either Israel is sovereign and its forces are not a foreign occupation, - or - Israel is sovereign and Hostile Arab Palestinian operations against Israel is an act of aggression.

In March 1978, a Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Jihadist (Fatah faction) Dalal Mughrabi killed the niece of Senator Abraham Ribicoff (D-Connecticut). And later on the same terrorist operation, they stopped and killed 24 adults and 12 children on the Coast Road bus. I mention is particular incident because JUST TODAY - the Hostile Arab Palestinians:

​

(June 15, 2020 / JNS) A music video aired on official Palestinian Authority television in June included images of terrorists, including Dalal Mughrabi, who together with others murdered 37 Israelis, among them 12 children, in 1978, according to an Israel-based media watchdog. ​

SOURCE: Veneration Video​

​

​

​

A Mail on Sunday investigation has found 24 schools named after Palestinian terrorists and evidence of widespread encouragement of violence against Israel by teachers, with terrorists routinely held up as heroes for schoolchildren.​

Pictures of ‘martyrs’ are posted on school walls, revolutionary slogans and symbols are painted on premises used by youngsters, sports events are named after teenage terrorists and children are encouraged to act out shooting Israeli soldiers in plays.​

SOURCE: Daily Mail​

​

​

Most Respectfully,
R

IF they claim that Israel is inside Palestine, THEN Palestine is in a state of a "Civil War" and not a foreign occupation.

The concept of Israel was foreign. The founders were foreign. The population was foreign. Its financing was foreign. Its political cover was foreign.

There is nothing "local" about Israel.

Oh really?

Sorry to burst your bubble,
but was it foreign you were sayin'...

And if already discussing -

then what is "local" about Palestine,
if Israelis and Palestinians came from the same countries?

So, Palestine was named in Hebrew?

Interesting.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The "prerequisites" under international convention cites a state should possess the following qualifications:
a.a permanent population;
b.a defined territory;
c.government;
d.capacity to enter into relations with the other states.

a. Palestine's permanent population dated back hundreds even thousands of years.
a. Israel's permanent population was recent colonial settlers.

b. Palestine's territory was defined by post war treaties.
b. Israel still has no defined territory.

c. Palestine had a temporarily appointed government that (supposedly) was to work in the best interest of the people.
c. Israel's government was imposed at the point of a gun against the wishes of the majority of the people.

d. Palestine enter several international treaties and even had a trade agreement with the US in 1932.
d. Israel - yes.

 

[Hollie]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Arab Palestinian Threat
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: A matter of perception...

WOW, a whole room of people pounding on the symptoms and not one looking at the problems.

(COMMENT)

Are → what you call symptoms - really the disease? I think you might have it backward.

When the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HAMAS) condemns Israel's participation in a security conference in Bahrain, is that really a symptom or is that the disease that causes the war to continue?

When Fatah says: "Murdering children is "legitimate human struggle" - when killer is Palestinian and victims are Israelis," is that not the symptom that causes the conflict to expand?

When PA officials say: "Jews have ‘no right to pray’ at Western Wall." Is that not a deliberate and inflammatory remark?

When Palestinian Arab Official Admits that “Killing Israelis is not Terror, it’s Legitimate,” is that not the incitement factor for hostile action?

The Palestinians do not opperate outside their own borders and they do not target Americans.

(COMMENT)

IF the Arab Palestinians THEN they are aggressively conduction operations against foreign sovereignty.

(Palestine borders are questionable. By no means are they a sovereign power. The question of whether or not they are a stand-alone government is up for debate.)

IF they claim that Israel is inside Palestine, THEN Palestine is in a state of a "Civil War" and not a foreign occupation. You cannot have it both ways. Either Israel is sovereign and its forces are not a foreign occupation, - or - Israel is sovereign and Hostile Arab Palestinian operations against Israel is an act of aggression.

In March 1978, a Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Jihadist (Fatah faction) Dalal Mughrabi killed the niece of Senator Abraham Ribicoff (D-Connecticut). And later on the same terrorist operation, they stopped and killed 24 adults and 12 children on the Coast Road bus. I mention is particular incident because JUST TODAY - the Hostile Arab Palestinians:

​

(June 15, 2020 / JNS) A music video aired on official Palestinian Authority television in June included images of terrorists, including Dalal Mughrabi, who together with others murdered 37 Israelis, among them 12 children, in 1978, according to an Israel-based media watchdog. ​

SOURCE: Veneration Video​

​

​

​

A Mail on Sunday investigation has found 24 schools named after Palestinian terrorists and evidence of widespread encouragement of violence against Israel by teachers, with terrorists routinely held up as heroes for schoolchildren.​

Pictures of ‘martyrs’ are posted on school walls, revolutionary slogans and symbols are painted on premises used by youngsters, sports events are named after teenage terrorists and children are encouraged to act out shooting Israeli soldiers in plays.​

SOURCE: Daily Mail​

​

​

Most Respectfully,
R

IF they claim that Israel is inside Palestine, THEN Palestine is in a state of a "Civil War" and not a foreign occupation.

The concept of Israel was foreign. The founders were foreign. The population was foreign. Its financing was foreign. Its political cover was foreign.

There is nothing "local" about Israel.

Oh really?

Sorry to burst your bubble,
but was it foreign you were sayin'...

And if already discussing -

then what is "local" about Palestine,
if Israelis and Palestinians came from the same countries?

So, Palestine was named in Hebrew?

Interesting.

Indeed, you can’t name those “new statescreated by the Treaty of Lausanne.

That seems strange indeed as you continue to press the false claim that the Treaty of Lausanne did indeed create “new states”.

You are indeed aware that your “new states” claim is a fraud so what does that say about your continued beating of that dead horse?

 

[Hollie]

Indeed, interesting. Arab-Moslem “Pal’istanians” existe

The "prerequisites" under international convention cites a state should possess the following qualifications:
a.a permanent population;
b.a defined territory;
c.government;
d.capacity to enter into relations with the other states.

a. Palestine's permanent population dated back hundreds even thousands of years.
a. Israel's permanent population was recent colonial settlers.

b. Palestine's territory was defined by post war treaties.
b. Israel still has no defined territory.

c. Palestine had a temporarily appointed government that (supposedly) was to work in the best interest of the people.
c. Israel's government was imposed at the point of a gun against the wishes of the majority of the people.

d. Palestine enter several international treaties and even had a trade agreement with the US in 1932.
d. Israel - yes.

Indeed, interesting. Arab-Moslem “Pal’istanians” existed before the Invention of Islam.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Arab Palestinian Threat
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: A matter of perception...

WOW, a whole room of people pounding on the symptoms and not one looking at the problems.

(COMMENT)

Are → what you call symptoms - really the disease? I think you might have it backward.

When the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HAMAS) condemns Israel's participation in a security conference in Bahrain, is that really a symptom or is that the disease that causes the war to continue?

When Fatah says: "Murdering children is "legitimate human struggle" - when killer is Palestinian and victims are Israelis," is that not the symptom that causes the conflict to expand?

When PA officials say: "Jews have ‘no right to pray’ at Western Wall." Is that not a deliberate and inflammatory remark?

When Palestinian Arab Official Admits that “Killing Israelis is not Terror, it’s Legitimate,” is that not the incitement factor for hostile action?

The Palestinians do not opperate outside their own borders and they do not target Americans.

(COMMENT)

IF the Arab Palestinians THEN they are aggressively conduction operations against foreign sovereignty.

(Palestine borders are questionable. By no means are they a sovereign power. The question of whether or not they are a stand-alone government is up for debate.)

IF they claim that Israel is inside Palestine, THEN Palestine is in a state of a "Civil War" and not a foreign occupation. You cannot have it both ways. Either Israel is sovereign and its forces are not a foreign occupation, - or - Israel is sovereign and Hostile Arab Palestinian operations against Israel is an act of aggression.

In March 1978, a Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Jihadist (Fatah faction) Dalal Mughrabi killed the niece of Senator Abraham Ribicoff (D-Connecticut). And later on the same terrorist operation, they stopped and killed 24 adults and 12 children on the Coast Road bus. I mention is particular incident because JUST TODAY - the Hostile Arab Palestinians:

​

(June 15, 2020 / JNS) A music video aired on official Palestinian Authority television in June included images of terrorists, including Dalal Mughrabi, who together with others murdered 37 Israelis, among them 12 children, in 1978, according to an Israel-based media watchdog. ​

SOURCE: Veneration Video​

​

​

​

A Mail on Sunday investigation has found 24 schools named after Palestinian terrorists and evidence of widespread encouragement of violence against Israel by teachers, with terrorists routinely held up as heroes for schoolchildren.​

Pictures of ‘martyrs’ are posted on school walls, revolutionary slogans and symbols are painted on premises used by youngsters, sports events are named after teenage terrorists and children are encouraged to act out shooting Israeli soldiers in plays.​

SOURCE: Daily Mail​

​

​

Most Respectfully,
R

IF they claim that Israel is inside Palestine, THEN Palestine is in a state of a "Civil War" and not a foreign occupation.

The concept of Israel was foreign. The founders were foreign. The population was foreign. Its financing was foreign. Its political cover was foreign.

There is nothing "local" about Israel.

Oh really?

Sorry to burst your bubble,
but was it foreign you were sayin'...

And if already discussing -

then what is "local" about Palestine,
if Israelis and Palestinians came from the same countries?

So, Palestine was named in Hebrew?

Interesting.

Indeed, you can’t name those “new statescreated by the Treaty of Lausanne.

That seems strange indeed as you continue to press the false claim that the Treaty of Lausanne did indeed create “new states”.

You are indeed aware that your “new states” claim is a fraud so what does that say about your continued beating of that dead horse?

That seems strange indeed as you continue to press the false claim that the Treaty of Lausanne did indeed create “new states”.

I never said that.

You need to stop listening to the voices in your head.

 

[Lastamender]

The "prerequisites" under international convention cites a state should possess the following qualifications:
a.a permanent population;
b.a defined territory;
c.government;
d.capacity to enter into relations with the other states.

a. Palestine's permanent population dated back hundreds even thousands of years.
a. Israel's permanent population was recent colonial settlers.

b. Palestine's territory was defined by post war treaties.
b. Israel still has no defined territory.

c. Palestine had a temporarily appointed government that (supposedly) was to work in the best interest of the people.
c. Israel's government was imposed at the point of a gun against the wishes of the majority of the people.

d. Palestine enter several international treaties and even had a trade agreement with the US in 1932.
d. Israel - yes.

When was Palestine founded? What was the Palestinian currency called? Who was their first leader?

 

[Hollie]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Arab Palestinian Threat
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: A matter of perception...

WOW, a whole room of people pounding on the symptoms and not one looking at the problems.

(COMMENT)

Are → what you call symptoms - really the disease? I think you might have it backward.

When the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HAMAS) condemns Israel's participation in a security conference in Bahrain, is that really a symptom or is that the disease that causes the war to continue?

When Fatah says: "Murdering children is "legitimate human struggle" - when killer is Palestinian and victims are Israelis," is that not the symptom that causes the conflict to expand?

When PA officials say: "Jews have ‘no right to pray’ at Western Wall." Is that not a deliberate and inflammatory remark?

When Palestinian Arab Official Admits that “Killing Israelis is not Terror, it’s Legitimate,” is that not the incitement factor for hostile action?

The Palestinians do not opperate outside their own borders and they do not target Americans.

(COMMENT)

IF the Arab Palestinians THEN they are aggressively conduction operations against foreign sovereignty.

(Palestine borders are questionable. By no means are they a sovereign power. The question of whether or not they are a stand-alone government is up for debate.)

IF they claim that Israel is inside Palestine, THEN Palestine is in a state of a "Civil War" and not a foreign occupation. You cannot have it both ways. Either Israel is sovereign and its forces are not a foreign occupation, - or - Israel is sovereign and Hostile Arab Palestinian operations against Israel is an act of aggression.

In March 1978, a Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Jihadist (Fatah faction) Dalal Mughrabi killed the niece of Senator Abraham Ribicoff (D-Connecticut). And later on the same terrorist operation, they stopped and killed 24 adults and 12 children on the Coast Road bus. I mention is particular incident because JUST TODAY - the Hostile Arab Palestinians:

​

(June 15, 2020 / JNS) A music video aired on official Palestinian Authority television in June included images of terrorists, including Dalal Mughrabi, who together with others murdered 37 Israelis, among them 12 children, in 1978, according to an Israel-based media watchdog. ​

SOURCE: Veneration Video​

​

​

​

A Mail on Sunday investigation has found 24 schools named after Palestinian terrorists and evidence of widespread encouragement of violence against Israel by teachers, with terrorists routinely held up as heroes for schoolchildren.​

Pictures of ‘martyrs’ are posted on school walls, revolutionary slogans and symbols are painted on premises used by youngsters, sports events are named after teenage terrorists and children are encouraged to act out shooting Israeli soldiers in plays.​

SOURCE: Daily Mail​

​

​

Most Respectfully,
R

IF they claim that Israel is inside Palestine, THEN Palestine is in a state of a "Civil War" and not a foreign occupation.

The concept of Israel was foreign. The founders were foreign. The population was foreign. Its financing was foreign. Its political cover was foreign.

There is nothing "local" about Israel.

Oh really?

Sorry to burst your bubble,
but was it foreign you were sayin'...

And if already discussing -

then what is "local" about Palestine,
if Israelis and Palestinians came from the same countries?

So, Palestine was named in Hebrew?

Interesting.

Indeed, you can’t name those “new statescreated by the Treaty of Lausanne.

That seems strange indeed as you continue to press the false claim that the Treaty of Lausanne did indeed create “new states”.

You are indeed aware that your “new states” claim is a fraud so what does that say about your continued beating of that dead horse?

That seems strange indeed as you continue to press the false claim that the Treaty of Lausanne did indeed create “new states”.

I never said that.

You need to stop listening to the voices in your head.

Are you confused about what you wrote?

 

[P F Tinmore]

How do we speak to Christians today about Palestine Israel with Dr Clint Le Bruyns

 

[Lastamender]

How do we speak to Christians today about Palestine Israel with Dr Clint Le Bruyns

Palestinians are terrorists.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Arab Palestinian Existence
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: I simply don't know where you get this belief from. But NO post-War Treaty on the 20th or 21st Century defines Palestine as a sovereign nation. It does define Palestine as a territory subject to a Mandate. It was considered not capable of standing on its own.

a. Palestine's permanent population dated back hundreds even thousands of years.
a. Israel's permanent population was recent colonial settlers.

(COMMENT)

Well, the territory to which we are referring, the Territory to which the Mandate Applied, was sovereign to the Ottoman Empire for nearly 800 years before the Ottoman/Turkish Republic renounces all rights and title to the Allied Powers.

After the termination of the Mandate, Palestine (the territory to which the Mandate Applied) continue to be a legal entity. Why? (RHETORICAL) It will still not be a sovereign state because it will not be immediately self-governing.

b. Palestine's territory was defined by post war treaties.
b. Israel still has no defined territory.

(COMMENT)

NO! Nothing of the sort. After the Termination of the Mandate, what territory was not held by the State of Israel, was held by components of the Arab League. It will not be until November 1988 before the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) became the sole legitimate representative of the Arab people of Palestine. This became a paradox because there was no territory liberated and earmarked for the Arab Palestinians in the West Bank, Jerusalem, or the Gaza Strip. ALL the territory formerly under the Mandate for Palestine was controlled by a party to the conflict.

c. Palestine had a temporarily appointed government that (supposedly) was to work in the best interest of the people.
c. Israel's government was imposed at the point of a gun against the wishes of the majority of the people.

(COMMENT)

The reality is what it is. BUT, NO "binding" promise or obligation was made to the Arab Palestinian. All the agreements pertaining to the territory were between parties to the conflict - and NOT the Arab Palestinians [former elements considered to be Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (OETA) protected persons].

d. Palestine enter several international treaties and even had a trade agreement with the US in 1932.
d. Israel - yes.

(COMMENT)

Again, half-Credit... You comment should read: The Government of Palestinian (British Administration) made agreements. NOT Palestine governed by Arab Palestinians. From 1922 to the end of the Mandate in 1948, the British High Commissioner had governed Palestine with the aid of Councils consisting exclusively of British officials.

₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪​

I give you a solid "C-" for effort only. Your accuracy was totally inadequate. The Mandatory had been entrusted with the control of the foreign relations of Palestine and the right to issue exequaturs to consuls appointed by foreign Powers.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

NO! Nothing of the sort. After the Termination of the Mandate, what territory was not held by the State of Israel, was held by components of the Arab League.

The Mandates had no territory. Whether the Mandate was there or not has no bearing on territory. So whose territory do you believe it was during thr Mandate period?

 

[Hollie]

NO! Nothing of the sort. After the Termination of the Mandate, what territory was not held by the State of Israel, was held by components of the Arab League.

The Mandates had no territory. Whether the Mandate was there or not has no bearing on territory. So whose territory do you believe it was during thr Mandate period?

That comment has been addressed more times than I can recall.

How is it possible you still don't understand?

 

[P F Tinmore]

NO! Nothing of the sort. After the Termination of the Mandate, what territory was not held by the State of Israel, was held by components of the Arab League.

The Mandates had no territory. Whether the Mandate was there or not has no bearing on territory. So whose territory do you believe it was during thr Mandate period?

That comment has been addressed more times than I can recall.

How is it possible you still don't understand?

Dancing is not a refute.