Lakhota
Diamond Member
Gee, ya think?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They tried. We, not you, resisted until they backed the fuck off.If the federal governmentforced all American's to have any vaccination against their will, I would not support that
With Roe as settled law, there would have been no reason to at the time.the left has had plenty of time to make this law and be done with it. they choose instead to use to like now, fire up a base over an issue.
their own fault for making it political and it resolving problems.
It's never settled law when it comes to the Court.With Roe as settled law, there would have been no reason to at the time.
TS. We are not one party leftist state much like you want.
Another good reversal.Citizens United.
if it was settled law, we'd not be here now would we?With Roe as settled law, there would have been no reason to at the time.
They had no idea Roe would ever be overturned.
Well, look at this stinking pile of shit. Hey, everybody, overturning Roe v. Wade is repugnant to conservatism.“America is a different place, with most of its population born after Roe was decided. And a decision to overturn Roe — which the court seems poised to do, according to the leak of a draft of a majority opinion from Justice Samuel Alito — would do more to replicate Roe’s damage than to reverse it.
It would be a radical, not conservative, choice.
What is conservative? It is, above all, the conviction that abrupt and profound changes to established laws and common expectations are utterly destructive to respect for the law and the institutions established to uphold it — especially when those changes are instigated from above, with neither democratic consent nor broad consensus.”
![]()
Opinion | Overturning Roe Is a Radical, Not Conservative, Choice (Published 2022)
An abrupt and profound change to an established law is utterly destructive to respect for the law.www.nytimes.com
Overturning Roe is therefore repugnant to conservativism – it is radical, extreme, reckless, and irresponsible.
Bullshit!The Rightwing penchant overturning long established precedent and established late, for putting in political judges and creating tbe most politically activist court since FDR almost a century ago….is indeed reckless.
The Supreme Court is losing credibility as being an impartial judiciary is being eroded in the eyes of many American. This isn’t good for our country. Neither is the possible precedent of giving individual rights and then taking them away.
No dumbfuck, bad law according to noted leftists Alan Dershowitz and Ruth Bader Ginsberg among others.Bad law according to who? Rightwingers.
No they didn’t. Not once did they respond to a question about how they would rule on any challenge to that decision. Cry harder.
Shove it asshole. Nobody committed perjury no matter how much you lie. They never were asked how they would rule on any appeal. By the way “settled law” is only settled until the next case comes up. By your standards, Brown vs Board of Education and Dred Scott best both be reverted back to what was “settled law”.
If the new SCOTUS appointees respected settled law.if it was settled law, we'd not be here now would we?
No they didn’t. Yes, you hypocrites did steal that line.They tried. We, not you, resisted until they backed the fuck off.
We even used the "my body, my choice" rally cry.
actually most legal scholars including RBG. think Roe was a poorly written illogical opinion.“America is a different place, with most of its population born after Roe was decided. And a decision to overturn Roe — which the court seems poised to do, according to the leak of a draft of a majority opinion from Justice Samuel Alito — would do more to replicate Roe’s damage than to reverse it.
It would be a radical, not conservative, choice.
What is conservative? It is, above all, the conviction that abrupt and profound changes to established laws and common expectations are utterly destructive to respect for the law and the institutions established to uphold it — especially when those changes are instigated from above, with neither democratic consent nor broad consensus.”
![]()
Opinion | Overturning Roe Is a Radical, Not Conservative, Choice (Published 2022)
An abrupt and profound change to an established law is utterly destructive to respect for the law.www.nytimes.com
Overturning Roe is therefore repugnant to conservativism – it is radical, extreme, reckless, and irresponsible.
Since precedent and settled law do not exist for right anymore (only selectively) I imagine a lot of rulings will come under scrutiny, like Heller. It won’t always be a rightwing majority.![]()
Latest News from the United States and Around the World | TheWorldNews
Latest U.S. news in a unique format 🌐 Stay updated on the latest and most relevant events happening around the world right nowtheworldnews.net
yes. they did. getting mad about it now doesn't change the fact they like to keep their political talking points alive and well and this blew up in their face.
diversion.If the new SCOTUS appointees respected settled law.
"for right"Since precedent and settled law do not exist for right anymore (only selectively) I imagine a lot of rulings will come under scrutiny, like Heller. It won’t always be a rightwing majority.