noonereal
Gold Member
- Jan 16, 2009
- 3,198
- 1,445
- 200
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No need.
Declaring martial law would not have been a viable legal optionHe should have declared martial law and stayed right where he was to continue fighting the cheats. In the WH. We have been invaded from outside influences and within.What do you think he could have done differently once the results were in?Trump could have stopped the steal. But he didn't. He walked away.
I mean he could have worked harder at being a president to all of the people of the United States so that more people could have had confidence enough to vote for him for an additional 4 years but he would have had to have foresight in the beginning of his presidency in order to have done that.
There was no "steal". He simply did not get enough votes to win the election, that's not a theft of the election. And let's not forget that he lost the popular vote in 2016 to Hillary so it was lie even back then when he claimed that he won by a landslide. In a landslide victory he would have won both the electoral vote AND the popular vote which he didn't. So his loss this time around is even worse than 2016 since he lost the presidency.
View attachment 453970
But since you think he lost fair and square, there is no reason to continue discussing this with you.
But in Ex parte Milligan (1866), the Supreme Court ruled Lincoln had overstepped his legitimate bounds. This ruling is “key” to understanding the president’s martial law powers today, Olson said. It means “the president cannot simply declare martial law at his whim. There must be a state of invasion or insurrection such that ground is actually contested, and resort to conventional civil courts and authority must have collapsed.” Absent those conditions, the court said in Milligan, martial law is “a gross usurpation of power,” and in fact “can never exist where the courts are open.”
The courts are open now, which means any declaration of martial law — including in the six states Flynn targeted — would be illegal. “Courts would not be afraid to recognize this as reason to strike down acts pretending to martial law authority,” Olson said, just as they haven’t been afraid to smack down specious election challenges. That might not stop Trump, Olson allowed, but it would stop many of the people he’d need to execute this plan. And even if their constitutional oaths did not constrain them, there would be “very real personal consequences for both civilian and military administrators should they go along” with such an unlawful proposal, Olson noted, as career bureaucrats and officers undoubtedly realize. (The Army statement is an indicator of this very understanding.)
In the form of what, where and by whom?There was massive fraud.What do you think he could have done differently once the results were in?Trump could have stopped the steal. But he didn't. He walked away.
I mean he could have worked harder at being a president to all of the people of the United States so that more people could have had confidence enough to vote for him for an additional 4 years but he would have had to have foresight in the beginning of his presidency in order to have done that.
There was no "steal". He simply did not get enough votes to win the election, that's not a theft of the election. And let's not forget that he lost the popular vote in 2016 to Hillary so it was lie even back then when he claimed that he won by a landslide. In a landslide victory he would have won both the electoral vote AND the popular vote which he didn't. So his loss this time around is even worse than 2016 since he lost the presidency.
View attachment 453970
In the form of what, where and by whom?There was massive fraud.What do you think he could have done differently once the results were in?Trump could have stopped the steal. But he didn't. He walked away.
I mean he could have worked harder at being a president to all of the people of the United States so that more people could have had confidence enough to vote for him for an additional 4 years but he would have had to have foresight in the beginning of his presidency in order to have done that.
There was no "steal". He simply did not get enough votes to win the election, that's not a theft of the election. And let's not forget that he lost the popular vote in 2016 to Hillary so it was lie even back then when he claimed that he won by a landslide. In a landslide victory he would have won both the electoral vote AND the popular vote which he didn't. So his loss this time around is even worse than 2016 since he lost the presidency.
View attachment 453970
Oh look! Another cyber tough guy with nothing to say.You need to grow the fuck up.
Thank you for providing me with a link to this website, although I have to admit I was thrown off a bit that they were displaying a map of Europe (at least I was pretty sure it's Europe) instead of the U.S.In the form of what, where and by whom?There was massive fraud.What do you think he could have done differently once the results were in?Trump could have stopped the steal. But he didn't. He walked away.
I mean he could have worked harder at being a president to all of the people of the United States so that more people could have had confidence enough to vote for him for an additional 4 years but he would have had to have foresight in the beginning of his presidency in order to have done that.
There was no "steal". He simply did not get enough votes to win the election, that's not a theft of the election. And let's not forget that he lost the popular vote in 2016 to Hillary so it was lie even back then when he claimed that he won by a landslide. In a landslide victory he would have won both the electoral vote AND the popular vote which he didn't. So his loss this time around is even worse than 2016 since he lost the presidency.
View attachment 453970
So it should be easy for you to bring this evidence to court and reinstall Dump. Why are you hiding this from him?Yea, and that news is based on the reports from the states and precincts reporting various issues, such as illegal mail in ballots per the state’s constitution, election officials refusing to comply with court ordered subpoenas, etc, ect. Not “Qanon” conspiracy theories.No need. Its on the news everyday. "Stop the steal" ring a bell?Link to these “Qanon” talking points?Youre going to eventually have to let go of your Qannon speaking points.
You domestic terrorists will be squashed like bugs. This i promise you.
So why doesn't this stuff be held up in court? Can't Trump find a lawyer?Consider that these private citizens had a lot to lose in coming forward including their safety and their family's safety. Over 400 of them stepped up and described what they witnessed and swore to it. Also recall the truck driver who went on live TV and described his experience of delivering an enormous pallet of ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. Huh? But we impeached a sitting President on the word of an ANONYMOUS whistleblower who witnessed NOTHING.
'No Evidence of Vote Fraud!' At Least 400 Affidavits Swear Otherwise
Republican National Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel told Fox Business Network’s Maria Bartiromo that the RNC has collected 12,000 incident reports of election-related irregularities and malfeasance. These complaints might or might not constitute evidence.www.newsmax.com
Impeachment is not for ordinary citizens.......Trump is no longer in office.Trump could have stopped the steal. But he didn't. He walked away.
ya - after lying that he would go to the capital, he instead walked away from his pawns & straight to his TV in the white house to watch the carnage like a sick dictator wanna be would do.
I don't know what Qanon is, and I don't care. I do know that over 400 private citizens swore under penalty of perjury that they saw election malfeasance. Yes it is possible all 400 of them perjured themselves but that seems as unlikely as your alien spaceship dumping votes for Biden.Bullshit. I could sign an affidavit claiming I saw an alien spaceship drop off 4 tons of rigged votes for Biden and zap 8 tons of votes for Dump. Time for you to deal with reality and leave the Qannon cult.
Oh look! Another cyber tough guy with nothing to say.You need to grow the fuck up.
Impeachment is not for ordinary citizens.......Trump is no longer in office.Trump could have stopped the steal. But he didn't. He walked away.
ya - after lying that he would go to the capital, he instead walked away from his pawns & straight to his TV in the white house to watch the carnage like a sick dictator wanna be would do.
This said no wonder they want to impeach him to make him ineligible to be back in office....the Pillow Man has the evidence of CHINA JOE stealing the election-----------drag his ass out in cuffs.
You appear to just show up to post worthless insults. Spend more time looking for a better job, you are a poor poster with nothing to say.I simply state fact.
You appear to just show up to post worthless insults. Spend more time looking for a better job, you are a poor poster with nothing to say.I simply state fact.
All they need is valid evidence that will hold up in Court.Consider that these private citizens had a lot to lose in coming forward including their safety and their family's safety. Over 400 of them stepped up and described what they witnessed and swore to it. Also recall the truck driver who went on live TV and described his experience of delivering an enormous pallet of ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. Huh? But we impeached a sitting President on the word of an ANONYMOUS whistleblower who witnessed NOTHING.
'No Evidence of Vote Fraud!' At Least 400 Affidavits Swear Otherwise
Republican National Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel told Fox Business Network’s Maria Bartiromo that the RNC has collected 12,000 incident reports of election-related irregularities and malfeasance. These complaints might or might not constitute evidence.www.newsmax.com
All they need is a court that will hear it. The evidence they have would prove fraud. That is why the courts refuse to hear it. Even you should be smart enough to figure that out.All they need is valid evidence that will hold up in Court.Consider that these private citizens had a lot to lose in coming forward including their safety and their family's safety. Over 400 of them stepped up and described what they witnessed and swore to it. Also recall the truck driver who went on live TV and described his experience of delivering an enormous pallet of ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. Huh? But we impeached a sitting President on the word of an ANONYMOUS whistleblower who witnessed NOTHING.
'No Evidence of Vote Fraud!' At Least 400 Affidavits Swear Otherwise
Republican National Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel told Fox Business Network’s Maria Bartiromo that the RNC has collected 12,000 incident reports of election-related irregularities and malfeasance. These complaints might or might not constitute evidence.www.newsmax.com
Right wingers claiming something on the Internet? Link or it didn't happen.All they need is a court that will hear it. The evidence they have would prove fraud. That is why the courts refuse to hear it. Even you should be smart enough to figure that out.All they need is valid evidence that will hold up in Court.Consider that these private citizens had a lot to lose in coming forward including their safety and their family's safety. Over 400 of them stepped up and described what they witnessed and swore to it. Also recall the truck driver who went on live TV and described his experience of delivering an enormous pallet of ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. Huh? But we impeached a sitting President on the word of an ANONYMOUS whistleblower who witnessed NOTHING.
'No Evidence of Vote Fraud!' At Least 400 Affidavits Swear Otherwise
Republican National Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel told Fox Business Network’s Maria Bartiromo that the RNC has collected 12,000 incident reports of election-related irregularities and malfeasance. These complaints might or might not constitute evidence.www.newsmax.com
Right wingers claiming something on the Internet? Link or it didn't happen.All they need is a court that will hear it. The evidence they have would prove fraud. That is why the courts refuse to hear it. Even you should be smart enough to figure that out.All they need is valid evidence that will hold up in Court.Consider that these private citizens had a lot to lose in coming forward including their safety and their family's safety. Over 400 of them stepped up and described what they witnessed and swore to it. Also recall the truck driver who went on live TV and described his experience of delivering an enormous pallet of ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. Huh? But we impeached a sitting President on the word of an ANONYMOUS whistleblower who witnessed NOTHING.
'No Evidence of Vote Fraud!' At Least 400 Affidavits Swear Otherwise
Republican National Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel told Fox Business Network’s Maria Bartiromo that the RNC has collected 12,000 incident reports of election-related irregularities and malfeasance. These complaints might or might not constitute evidence.www.newsmax.com