Out-of-Wedlock Births Discussion

[History]

So here's the Statistics of Out-of-Wedlock Births

72.3% of non-Hispanic blacks
66.2% of American Indians/Alaska Natives
53.3% of Hispanics
29.1% of non-Hispanic whites
17.2% of Asians/Pacific Islanders

So what's your take on these statistics? Poverty? Education? Family Values?

 

[tyroneweaver]

glorified form of masturbation (for men) and women fall for it

 

[Clementine]

The ones who are favorite groups for liberals to "help" are doing worse than others. I don't think some people can survive any more help from Democrats. The people doing the worst seem to be the ones who trust government the most. I suspect that is part of the cause of their troubles.

 

[Drake_Roberts]

So here's the Statistics of Out-of-Wedlock Births

72.3% of non-Hispanic blacks
66.2% of American Indians/Alaska Natives
53.3% of Hispanics
29.1% of non-Hispanic whites
17.2% of Asians/Pacific Islanders

So what's your take on these statistics? Poverty? Education? Family Values?

I'm going with family values, but those are affected by education and poverty, so...

 

[Moonglow]

I don't know about any sperm donations I left.

 

[freedombecki]

So here's the Statistics of Out-of-Wedlock Births

72.3% of non-Hispanic blacks
66.2% of American Indians/Alaska Natives
53.3% of Hispanics
29.1% of non-Hispanic whites
17.2% of Asians/Pacific Islanders

So what's your take on these statistics? Poverty? Education? Family Values?

The cuckoo bird lays its egg in other birds' nest. The cuckoo babies often eat the other babies' food when both parents are out there struggling to bring home more food.

The system works.

The Pennsylvania Dutch have an old saying, "Ve are too soon aldt. Ve are too late schmardt."

Go figure.

 

[martybegan]

So here's the Statistics of Out-of-Wedlock Births

72.3% of non-Hispanic blacks
66.2% of American Indians/Alaska Natives
53.3% of Hispanics
29.1% of non-Hispanic whites
17.2% of Asians/Pacific Islanders

So what's your take on these statistics? Poverty? Education? Family Values?

The State has become a willing (and crappy) foster father for kids born out of wedlock and in poverty. It allows males of a certain mindset the ability to spread their seed far and wide and avoid any of the repercussions. It also allows women to avoid serious issues of raising a child without a father because the State will take care of it.

 

[Wry Catcher]

So here's the Statistics of Out-of-Wedlock Births

72.3% of non-Hispanic blacks
66.2% of American Indians/Alaska Natives
53.3% of Hispanics
29.1% of non-Hispanic whites
17.2% of Asians/Pacific Islanders

So what's your take on these statistics? Poverty? Education? Family Values?

What's your "take on these statistics"? seems to me if one is concerned about the unmarried having children they would pose a question not likely to illicit bigots and racists to chime in and point fingers at specific races and ethnicities.

 

[Meister]

Oh for f*cks sake!!!!!!
Does every damn threda on this forum have to be hijacked and made to have something to do with gays???

Agreed

 

[martybegan]

So here's the Statistics of Out-of-Wedlock Births

72.3% of non-Hispanic blacks
66.2% of American Indians/Alaska Natives
53.3% of Hispanics
29.1% of non-Hispanic whites
17.2% of Asians/Pacific Islanders

So what's your take on these statistics? Poverty? Education? Family Values?

What's your "take on these statistics"? seems to me if one is concerned about the unmarried having children they would pose a question not likely to illicit bigots and racists to chime in and point fingers at specific races and ethnicities.

So showing numbers now is being racist?

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Judaism 101: Marriage

"Prohibited Marriages and Illegitimate Children

Children born out of wedlock are not mamzerim in Jewish law and bear no stigma, unless the marriage would have been prohibited for the reasons above."

If G-d doesn't have a problem with it, why should we?

 

[Bluedog]

Impulsive sex is hot. Think about it. Fertile woman and typical male. Condums be damned.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Too bad the right is so against birth control.

They'd rather see children having children than admit that children have sex.

And then, they're against education, either before or after those births. That way, they can keep the poor down and gloat about starving children.

For the right, this is called a win-win situation.

 

[martybegan]

Too bad the right is so against birth control.

They'd rather see children having children than admit that children have sex.

And then, they're against education, either before or after those births. That way, they can keep the poor down and gloat about starving children.

For the right, this is called a win-win situation.

Not all the right is against birth control, what most of us are against is the State intervening in how Children are raised.

What the left wants is to basically say is no one is responsible for their actions, that you can **** up your life all you want and not worry, because the big daddy and mommie progressives will force someone else to pay for your lifestyle and your mistakes.

So you can go out there **** like sea otters, not work, do drugs, and basically contribute nothing to society, but the big ol progressives will never judge you, and never make you do something to better yourself.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

So here's the Statistics of Out-of-Wedlock Births

72.3% of non-Hispanic blacks
66.2% of American Indians/Alaska Natives
53.3% of Hispanics
29.1% of non-Hispanic whites
17.2% of Asians/Pacific Islanders

So what's your take on these statistics? Poverty? Education? Family Values?

How about the social welfare state? These idiots wouldn't be having the babies if they had to pay for them.

 

[koshergrl]

How quaint.

Out of wedlock births for gay couples - zero.

And yet they are still marrying each other in droves everywhere they can.

Does not say much positive about straights, does it.

Regards from Rosie

2 things.
1. Unless you exist because of a laboratory experiment, your life is owed to heterosexuals.
2. It is impossible for gays to have children, wedlock or not. (By birth)

Which has nothing to do with the standards of the OP. The OP omits gay married persons. It should not.

Gay couples have zero out of wedlock births and the numbers of marriages between gays are higher than they have ever been.

The OP should celebrate how well gay couples fulfill the desired results - not having children outside of marriage. Gays obviously fit that demand!

Which also goes to show the futility of legislating morality, which all but those bound to a Church recognize as unalterable truth.

Regards from Rosie

Start your own thread.

The OP is what the OP is. You have no say in what the OP SHOULD be. Stick to the topic, or leave.

 

[koshergrl]

The statistics show that populations that are most heavily influenced by progressive values have a problem.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The statistics show that populations that are most heavily influenced by progressive values have a problem.

Actually, of course, just the opposite is true -

RED FAMILIES v. BLUE FAMILIES

With precision, Cahn and Carbone first detail the surprising reality about divorce, abortion, custody, marriage, sexual behavior, and sexual education in the United States today. As they outline in the first two chapters, the moral demography and sexual history of the country have changed dramatically over time, resulting in a polarization of a sexual culture within the country. As the authors next describe, blue states are comprised of highly educated, middle class families in urban areas. As a result of a new value system, it is argued that the blue regions of the country have created a new family culture poised for the post-industrial economy. Specifically, the culture in blue states encourages egalitarian gender roles and acceptance of gay and lesbian couples, women’s workforce participation, and delaying marriage and childbearing until both parents are financially and emotionally ready.



In comparison, the “red” regions of the country have rejected the value system found in blue states today. Red families are described as “poor Appalachian whites with relatively high teen pregnancy rates, Utah Mormons with higher educational attainment and lower teen birthrates but younger average ages at marriage, mountain families in Wyoming and Montana with strong libertarian traditions, and suburban and rural Midwestern families from Kansas, Nebraska and the Dakotas” (p.11). In red states, teen childbirth is an alleged deterrent to non-marital sexuality, marriage is sacred and only found between men and women, and divorce is considered a sin. Despite these “family values,” however, the evidence presented shows that red states experience higher rates of teen pregnancy and divorce. Cahn and Carbone depict in RED FAMILIES v. BLUE FAMILIES that a culturally conservative “red America” is stuck trying to sustain an outdated social value model. Thus, by insisting on abstinence before marriage, Cahn and Carbone argue, social conservatives guarantee their children will get pregnant early and often, leading to shotgun marriages, teen childbirth and high divorce rates.

 

[koshergrl]

Lol.

You certainly are hardwired into your progressive mistresses, luds.

 

[koshergrl]

Cripes.