Our Time

[PoliticalChic]

And on that basis, of course, evolution is not a fact.

". There are no laboratory demonstrations of speciation, millions of fruit flies coming and going while never once suggesting that they were destined to appear as anything other than fruit flies.

More than six thousand years of breeding and artificial selection, barnyard and backyard, have never induced a chicken to lay a square egg or persuade a pig to develop wheels or ball bearings."

Berlinski


Doesn't bode well for Darwin's theory.




And this:

"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field." Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.

I guess you don't believe in gravity either since you've never seen it and no lab has ever produce any.

You can try to change the subject, due to the beating you're taking.....having been dumb enough to believe Darwin's theory is a fact....

....but I won't allow you to.


But you may pin the tail on yourself, donkey.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And on that basis, of course, evolution is not a fact.

". There are no laboratory demonstrations of speciation, millions of fruit flies coming and going while never once suggesting that they were destined to appear as anything other than fruit flies.

More than six thousand years of breeding and artificial selection, barnyard and backyard, have never induced a chicken to lay a square egg or persuade a pig to develop wheels or ball bearings."

Berlinski


Doesn't bode well for Darwin's theory.




And this:

"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field." Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.

An ignorant or dishonest post. The theory of evolution, the descent from a common ancestor, it a fact based on evidence from many sciences. It is the mechanism for it, that is still being debated.

Dishonest?


More proof of Rule #2


Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

'There is no Big Other.'
(Slavoj Zizek)

Life began, amino acids began, at the crusty mouth of an electrified volcano, and "god" still dances on it. duh See Miller-Urey volcanic spark experiment, which was reproduced at Livermore Labs. duh

Watch me skewer you, you dunce.


The Urey experiment presupposed elements: Water, hydrogen, ammonia, and methane.

Where did they come from, you moron????


The Left does everything it can to convince morons like you that God nor religion have any place in explaining the world, the universe.

They make up absurd theories, like the Multiverse.


And dopes simply say....'duh...yup...yup.....dat's it..!!'


And this whopper:

There is prominent scientist, Lawrence Krauss, "... an American theoretical physicist and cosmologist...known as an advocate of the public understanding of science, ...and works to reduce the impact of superstition and religious dogma in pop culture. He is also the author of several bestselling books, includingThe Physics of Star Trek and A Universe from Nothing."
Lawrence M. Krauss - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


Krauss has said "we all, literally, emerged from quantum nothingness..."
Clearly an attempt to avoid the central question of where did the universe come from. Where are the quantum rules that imply a universe that must appear out of the void? Can any come up with a few examples where something has come from nothing?




And, from reviews of Krauss' book, " A Universe From Nothing,"...

"....at the end of the book he he has given up trying to explain his hypothesis. Throughout the book he admits that Something can come from Nothing only if there is Something inherent in the Nothingness.

...Krauss claims that "in quantum gravity, universes can, and indeed always will, spontaneously appear from nothing" This is yet again another fabrication,....

Krauss mixes opinion with pseudo-science to fool his cult that the universe popped into existence from nowhere with no cause (the epitome pseudo-science, anti-science and religious belief)."



Of course, the ancient Greek, Parmenides, was correct: nihil fit ex nihilo... "out of nothing, nothing [be]comes."


The fake science dunces are willing to accept anything...even things that obviate all of real science.
Raise your paw, you imbecile.

 

[alang1216]

You said the fossil record proved Darwin's theory.

I proved the very opposite is true.

Why are you back?

Because if you had proved it you'd be even more famous and celebrated than Darwin himself. Yet you're not. Why is that?

 

[alang1216]

Dishonest?

More proof of Rule #2

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"???

Ask Sarah Huckabee-Sanders about the fake news coming from the MSM and then ask her about the many FBI agents that wrote to her about Comey. Then fell free to update.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You said the fossil record proved Darwin's theory.

I proved the very opposite is true.

Why are you back?

Because if you had proved it you'd be even more famous and celebrated than Darwin himself. Yet you're not. Why is that?

But I did prove it....you're simply a scummy lying Liberal.

Let's check:

Did you write this?

"The truth is that every one of the trillions of fossils found support Darwin."


Of course you did.



And did I ram those lying words back down your throat with this?


" A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."

Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (Nature)



"...all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."



More?

. Even from Time magazine:

"Over the decades, evolutionary theorists beginning with Charles Darwin have tried to argue that the appearance of multicelled animals during the Cambrian merely seemed sudden, and in fact had been preceded by a lengthy period of evolution for which the geological record was missing. But this explanation, while it patched over a hole in an otherwise masterly theory, now seems increasingly unsatisfactory. Since 1987, discoveries of major fossil beds in Greenland, in China, in Siberia, and now in Namibia have shown that the period of biological innovation occurred at virtually the same instant in geologic time all around the world." Extrait de:



More????


How about the sudden.....sudden....appearance of vertebrates in the Cambrian??

In 1999, paleontologists in Southern China also found fossil remains of fish in the Cambrian period. Fish are vertebrates, members of the phylum chordata. Shu, et. al., "Lower Cambrian Vertebrates in Southern China" (Haikouichthy) Error - Cookies Turned Off



"But the curious thing is that there is a consistency about the fossil gaps: the fossils go missing in all the important places. When you look for links between major groups of animals, they simply aren't there; at least, not in enough numbers to put their status beyond doubt. Either they don't exist at all, or they are so rare that endless argument goes on about whether a particular fossil is, or isn't, or might be, transitional between this group or that." [emphasis in original] Francis Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe: Where Darwin Went Wrong(New Haven Ct,:Ticknor and Fields, 1992) p. 19. (See my articleThe Coelacanth, Living Fossils, and Evolution).

There is no fossil record establishing historical continuity of structure for most characters that might be used to assess relationships among phyla." Katherine G. Field et al., "Molecular Phylogeny of the animal Kingdom," Science, Vol. 239, 12 February 1988, p. 748.


". . . the gradual morphological transitions between presumed ancestors and descendants, anticipated by most biologists, are missing." David E. Schindel (Curator of Invertebrate Fossils, Peabody Museum of Natural History), "The Gaps in the Fossil Record," Nature, Vol. 297, 27 May 1982, p. 282.


We have pre-Cambrian fossils....and Cambrian fossils. In the latter there are fully formed brand new species with new body types and organs with no evidence of attempts in nature to lead up to these new species.

a. Steven J. Gould reported: "In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and fully formed." (Gould, Stephen J. The Panda's Thumb, 1980, p. 181-182)




Seems you Liberals have been trained to simply shrug when your lies are revealed.

 

[alang1216]

'There is no Big Other.'
(Slavoj Zizek)

Life began, amino acids began, at the crusty mouth of an electrified volcano, and "god" still dances on it. duh See Miller-Urey volcanic spark experiment, which was reproduced at Livermore Labs. duh

Watch me skewer you, you dunce.


The Urey experiment presupposed elements: Water, hydrogen, ammonia, and methane.

Where did they come from, you moron????


The Left does everything it can to convince morons like you that God nor religion have any place in explaining the world, the universe.

They make up absurd theories, like the Multiverse.


And dopes simply say....'duh...yup...yup.....dat's it..!!'


And this whopper:

There is prominent scientist, Lawrence Krauss, "... an American theoretical physicist and cosmologist...known as an advocate of the public understanding of science, ...and works to reduce the impact of superstition and religious dogma in pop culture. He is also the author of several bestselling books, includingThe Physics of Star Trek and A Universe from Nothing."
Lawrence M. Krauss - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


Krauss has said "we all, literally, emerged from quantum nothingness..."
Clearly an attempt to avoid the central question of where did the universe come from. Where are the quantum rules that imply a universe that must appear out of the void? Can any come up with a few examples where something has come from nothing?




And, from reviews of Krauss' book, " A Universe From Nothing,"...

"....at the end of the book he he has given up trying to explain his hypothesis. Throughout the book he admits that Something can come from Nothing only if there is Something inherent in the Nothingness.

...Krauss claims that "in quantum gravity, universes can, and indeed always will, spontaneously appear from nothing" This is yet again another fabrication,....

Krauss mixes opinion with pseudo-science to fool his cult that the universe popped into existence from nowhere with no cause (the epitome pseudo-science, anti-science and religious belief)."



Of course, the ancient Greek, Parmenides, was correct: nihil fit ex nihilo... "out of nothing, nothing [be]comes."


The fake science dunces are willing to accept anything...even things that obviate all of real science.
Raise your paw, you imbecile.

Since you don't accept something coming from nothing, why don't you accept that the universe has always been here, maybe only the form of it has changed? Kind of like the common concept ot God.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Dishonest?

More proof of Rule #2

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"???

Ask Sarah Huckabee-Sanders about the fake news coming from the MSM and then ask her about the many FBI agents that wrote to her about Comey. Then fell free to update.

I expose you as lying scum, and the playbook is that you change the subject.


Liberals switch positions more frequently than the Kama Sutra recommends.

 

[alang1216]

You said the fossil record proved Darwin's theory.

I proved the very opposite is true.

Why are you back?

Because if you had proved it you'd be even more famous and celebrated than Darwin himself. Yet you're not. Why is that?

But I did prove it....you're simply a scummy lying Liberal.

Let's check:

Did you write this?

"The truth is that every one of the trillions of fossils found support Darwin."


Of course you did.



And did I ram those lying words back down your throat with this?


" A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."

Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (Nature)



"...all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."



More?

. Even from Time magazine:

"Over the decades, evolutionary theorists beginning with Charles Darwin have tried to argue that the appearance of multicelled animals during the Cambrian merely seemed sudden, and in fact had been preceded by a lengthy period of evolution for which the geological record was missing. But this explanation, while it patched over a hole in an otherwise masterly theory, now seems increasingly unsatisfactory. Since 1987, discoveries of major fossil beds in Greenland, in China, in Siberia, and now in Namibia have shown that the period of biological innovation occurred at virtually the same instant in geologic time all around the world." Extrait de:



More????


How about the sudden.....sudden....appearance of vertebrates in the Cambrian??

In 1999, paleontologists in Southern China also found fossil remains of fish in the Cambrian period. Fish are vertebrates, members of the phylum chordata. Shu, et. al., "Lower Cambrian Vertebrates in Southern China" (Haikouichthy) Error - Cookies Turned Off



"But the curious thing is that there is a consistency about the fossil gaps: the fossils go missing in all the important places. When you look for links between major groups of animals, they simply aren't there; at least, not in enough numbers to put their status beyond doubt. Either they don't exist at all, or they are so rare that endless argument goes on about whether a particular fossil is, or isn't, or might be, transitional between this group or that." [emphasis in original] Francis Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe: Where Darwin Went Wrong(New Haven Ct,:Ticknor and Fields, 1992) p. 19. (See my articleThe Coelacanth, Living Fossils, and Evolution).

There is no fossil record establishing historical continuity of structure for most characters that might be used to assess relationships among phyla." Katherine G. Field et al., "Molecular Phylogeny of the animal Kingdom," Science, Vol. 239, 12 February 1988, p. 748.


". . . the gradual morphological transitions between presumed ancestors and descendants, anticipated by most biologists, are missing." David E. Schindel (Curator of Invertebrate Fossils, Peabody Museum of Natural History), "The Gaps in the Fossil Record," Nature, Vol. 297, 27 May 1982, p. 282.


We have pre-Cambrian fossils....and Cambrian fossils. In the latter there are fully formed brand new species with new body types and organs with no evidence of attempts in nature to lead up to these new species.

a. Steven J. Gould reported: "In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and fully formed." (Gould, Stephen J. The Panda's Thumb, 1980, p. 181-182)




Seems you Liberals have been trained to simply shrug when your lies are revealed.

You did NOT ram those 'lying' words back down my throat. I wrote "The truth is that every one of the trillions of fossils found support Darwin". Your beef is NOT that the trillions of fossils found disprove Darwin but that there are gaps in the fossil record. Well duh. Per the traditional aphorism, "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".

 

[alang1216]

Dishonest?

More proof of Rule #2

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"???

Ask Sarah Huckabee-Sanders about the fake news coming from the MSM and then ask her about the many FBI agents that wrote to her about Comey. Then fell free to update.

I expose you as lying scum, and the playbook is that you change the subject.


Liberals switch positions more frequently than the Kama Sutra recommends.

My bad, I thought you had changed the subject to politics when you brought in the Left, the Russia Probe, and the Clintons.

 

[Taz]

Dishonest?

More proof of Rule #2

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"???

Ask Sarah Huckabee-Sanders about the fake news coming from the MSM and then ask her about the many FBI agents that wrote to her about Comey. Then fell free to update.

I expose you as lying scum, and the playbook is that you change the subject.


Liberals switch positions more frequently than the Kama Sutra recommends.

My bad, I thought you had changed the subject to politics when you brought in the Left, the Russia Probe, and the Clintons.

NorthKoreaChic simply draws you in so she can insult you. She needs some deprogramming.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. Notwithstanding the fact that the views that have replaced God with government have never worked, and regularly end in mass deaths, it is popular with large swaths of individuals. Bernie Sanders is the Democrat frontrunner currently.


“…Dostoyevsky (1821-1881) worried deeply about mankind unbound from moral obligation. He saw in the rise of an atheistic world the face of the Marquis de Sade…..sadist, rapist, pedophile who embraced passion, discounted human responsibility, and….dismissed God…

[Dostoyevsky] foresaw that materialist man was far more of a threat than religious man-….He saw that man would find in his search for purpose something far darker than the Judeo-Christian tradition…” Shapiro, “The Right Side Of History,” p. 115-116

Ivan Karamazov, in “The Brothers Karamazov,” exclaimed ‘if God does not exist, then everything is permitted.’


9. Dostoyevsky was prescient in so may ways. He saw that reason and science were being touted as the only guides that mankind needed….and he didn’t accept same. “Human beings are creatures that seek more than which reason and science purport to give them- and they are more than the self-interested animals reason and science seek to make them. ….freed from moral responsibility….[they] would burst forth in a conflagration that will set the whole world on fire, Dostoyevsky predicted.

God’s death, Dostoyevsky thought, was man’s death as well.”

Shapiro, Op.Cit., p.117

 

[PoliticalChic]

You said the fossil record proved Darwin's theory.

I proved the very opposite is true.

Why are you back?

Because if you had proved it you'd be even more famous and celebrated than Darwin himself. Yet you're not. Why is that?

But I did prove it....you're simply a scummy lying Liberal.

Let's check:

Did you write this?

"The truth is that every one of the trillions of fossils found support Darwin."


Of course you did.



And did I ram those lying words back down your throat with this?


" A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."

Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (Nature)



"...all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."



More?

. Even from Time magazine:

"Over the decades, evolutionary theorists beginning with Charles Darwin have tried to argue that the appearance of multicelled animals during the Cambrian merely seemed sudden, and in fact had been preceded by a lengthy period of evolution for which the geological record was missing. But this explanation, while it patched over a hole in an otherwise masterly theory, now seems increasingly unsatisfactory. Since 1987, discoveries of major fossil beds in Greenland, in China, in Siberia, and now in Namibia have shown that the period of biological innovation occurred at virtually the same instant in geologic time all around the world." Extrait de:



More????


How about the sudden.....sudden....appearance of vertebrates in the Cambrian??

In 1999, paleontologists in Southern China also found fossil remains of fish in the Cambrian period. Fish are vertebrates, members of the phylum chordata. Shu, et. al., "Lower Cambrian Vertebrates in Southern China" (Haikouichthy) Error - Cookies Turned Off



"But the curious thing is that there is a consistency about the fossil gaps: the fossils go missing in all the important places. When you look for links between major groups of animals, they simply aren't there; at least, not in enough numbers to put their status beyond doubt. Either they don't exist at all, or they are so rare that endless argument goes on about whether a particular fossil is, or isn't, or might be, transitional between this group or that." [emphasis in original] Francis Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe: Where Darwin Went Wrong(New Haven Ct,:Ticknor and Fields, 1992) p. 19. (See my articleThe Coelacanth, Living Fossils, and Evolution).

There is no fossil record establishing historical continuity of structure for most characters that might be used to assess relationships among phyla." Katherine G. Field et al., "Molecular Phylogeny of the animal Kingdom," Science, Vol. 239, 12 February 1988, p. 748.


". . . the gradual morphological transitions between presumed ancestors and descendants, anticipated by most biologists, are missing." David E. Schindel (Curator of Invertebrate Fossils, Peabody Museum of Natural History), "The Gaps in the Fossil Record," Nature, Vol. 297, 27 May 1982, p. 282.


We have pre-Cambrian fossils....and Cambrian fossils. In the latter there are fully formed brand new species with new body types and organs with no evidence of attempts in nature to lead up to these new species.

a. Steven J. Gould reported: "In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and fully formed." (Gould, Stephen J. The Panda's Thumb, 1980, p. 181-182)




Seems you Liberals have been trained to simply shrug when your lies are revealed.

You did NOT ram those 'lying' words back down my throat. I wrote "The truth is that every one of the trillions of fossils found support Darwin". Your beef is NOT that the trillions of fossils found disprove Darwin but that there are gaps in the fossil record. Well duh. Per the traditional aphorism, "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".

Yet, you are a lying low-life.


Glad you asked.

 

[Taz]

You said the fossil record proved Darwin's theory.

I proved the very opposite is true.

Why are you back?

Because if you had proved it you'd be even more famous and celebrated than Darwin himself. Yet you're not. Why is that?

But I did prove it....you're simply a scummy lying Liberal.

Let's check:

Did you write this?

"The truth is that every one of the trillions of fossils found support Darwin."


Of course you did.



And did I ram those lying words back down your throat with this?


" A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."

Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (Nature)



"...all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."



More?

. Even from Time magazine:

"Over the decades, evolutionary theorists beginning with Charles Darwin have tried to argue that the appearance of multicelled animals during the Cambrian merely seemed sudden, and in fact had been preceded by a lengthy period of evolution for which the geological record was missing. But this explanation, while it patched over a hole in an otherwise masterly theory, now seems increasingly unsatisfactory. Since 1987, discoveries of major fossil beds in Greenland, in China, in Siberia, and now in Namibia have shown that the period of biological innovation occurred at virtually the same instant in geologic time all around the world." Extrait de:



More????


How about the sudden.....sudden....appearance of vertebrates in the Cambrian??

In 1999, paleontologists in Southern China also found fossil remains of fish in the Cambrian period. Fish are vertebrates, members of the phylum chordata. Shu, et. al., "Lower Cambrian Vertebrates in Southern China" (Haikouichthy) Error - Cookies Turned Off



"But the curious thing is that there is a consistency about the fossil gaps: the fossils go missing in all the important places. When you look for links between major groups of animals, they simply aren't there; at least, not in enough numbers to put their status beyond doubt. Either they don't exist at all, or they are so rare that endless argument goes on about whether a particular fossil is, or isn't, or might be, transitional between this group or that." [emphasis in original] Francis Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe: Where Darwin Went Wrong(New Haven Ct,:Ticknor and Fields, 1992) p. 19. (See my articleThe Coelacanth, Living Fossils, and Evolution).

There is no fossil record establishing historical continuity of structure for most characters that might be used to assess relationships among phyla." Katherine G. Field et al., "Molecular Phylogeny of the animal Kingdom," Science, Vol. 239, 12 February 1988, p. 748.


". . . the gradual morphological transitions between presumed ancestors and descendants, anticipated by most biologists, are missing." David E. Schindel (Curator of Invertebrate Fossils, Peabody Museum of Natural History), "The Gaps in the Fossil Record," Nature, Vol. 297, 27 May 1982, p. 282.


We have pre-Cambrian fossils....and Cambrian fossils. In the latter there are fully formed brand new species with new body types and organs with no evidence of attempts in nature to lead up to these new species.

a. Steven J. Gould reported: "In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and fully formed." (Gould, Stephen J. The Panda's Thumb, 1980, p. 181-182)




Seems you Liberals have been trained to simply shrug when your lies are revealed.

You did NOT ram those 'lying' words back down my throat. I wrote "The truth is that every one of the trillions of fossils found support Darwin". Your beef is NOT that the trillions of fossils found disprove Darwin but that there are gaps in the fossil record. Well duh. Per the traditional aphorism, "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".

Yet, you are a lying low-life.


Glad you asked.

 

[Mike Dwight]

 

[alang1216]

Dishonest?

More proof of Rule #2

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"???

Ask Sarah Huckabee-Sanders about the fake news coming from the MSM and then ask her about the many FBI agents that wrote to her about Comey. Then fell free to update.

I expose you as lying scum, and the playbook is that you change the subject.


Liberals switch positions more frequently than the Kama Sutra recommends.

My bad, I thought you had changed the subject to politics when you brought in the Left, the Russia Probe, and the Clintons.

NorthKoreaChic simply draws you in so she can insult you. She needs some deprogramming.

I still say Russian Bot.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Dishonest?

More proof of Rule #2

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"???

Ask Sarah Huckabee-Sanders about the fake news coming from the MSM and then ask her about the many FBI agents that wrote to her about Comey. Then fell free to update.

I expose you as lying scum, and the playbook is that you change the subject.


Liberals switch positions more frequently than the Kama Sutra recommends.

My bad, I thought you had changed the subject to politics when you brought in the Left, the Russia Probe, and the Clintons.

NorthKoreaChic simply draws you in so she can insult you. She needs some deprogramming.

I still say Russian Bot.

Yes, you are low-life lying scum.

But....I thought you knew.

 

[Mike Dwight]

 

[PoliticalChic]

10. This is our time.

Over the last two centuries the forces of evil and ignorance have made meaningful gains. Instead of celebrating the two pillars of Western Civilization, faith and reason, they have been able to eviscerate faith and religion, and morality, and left only what they call reason, but including a huge dollop of evil.



Two problems with relying on reason and the human mind:

a. ‘reason’ is eminently susceptible to rationalizations, meaning we can convince ourselves of anything we wish to
and
b. perhaps as a corollary of the above, we fail to see every possibility of our actions…..and that's why our actions often lead to ills that hadn't anticipated.




The Enlightenment, as a case in point. So thrilled with the explanations that science could provide, the intelligentsia jumped to the conclusion that it should be used as the guide for society…..reason and science to replace religion and morality.

" When morality became privatized, the questions “what is right” became “what is right for me.” Feelings... became the arbiters of behavior. Rather than traditional taboos, only religiously based moral judgment was deemed taboo. The harm caused to abandoned spouses or children by adultery or desertion- harm that can be objectively documented in rates of ill health, depression, educational underachievement, criminal behavior- was all but ignored, while damage done to people’s feelings by condemnation of their adultery or desertion was considered unforgiveable."
"The World Turned Upside Down," Melanie Phillips, chapter 14


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

See if you recognize the similarity in this Margaret Mead, anthropologist, quote: The natives are superficially agreeable, but they go in for cannibalism, headhunting, infanticide, incest, avoidance and joking relationships, and biting lice in half with their teeth.

One wonders, if she were still alive, what her views of this Democrat Party would be.





Welcome to our time.

 

[Taz]

10. This is our time.

Over the last two centuries the forces of evil and ignorance have made meaningful gains. Instead of celebrating the two pillars of Western Civilization, faith and reason, they have been able to eviscerate faith and religion, and morality, and left only what they call reason, but including a huge dollop of evil.



Two problems with relying on reason and the human mind:

a. ‘reason’ is eminently susceptible to rationalizations, meaning we can convince ourselves of anything we wish to
and
b. perhaps as a corollary of the above, we fail to see every possibility of our actions…..and that's why our actions often lead to ills that hadn't anticipated.




The Enlightenment, as a case in point. So thrilled with the explanations that science could provide, the intelligentsia jumped to the conclusion that it should be used as the guide for society…..reason and science to replace religion and morality.

" When morality became privatized, the questions “what is right” became “what is right for me.” Feelings... became the arbiters of behavior. Rather than traditional taboos, only religiously based moral judgment was deemed taboo. The harm caused to abandoned spouses or children by adultery or desertion- harm that can be objectively documented in rates of ill health, depression, educational underachievement, criminal behavior- was all but ignored, while damage done to people’s feelings by condemnation of their adultery or desertion was considered unforgiveable."
"The World Turned Upside Down," Melanie Phillips, chapter 14


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

See if you recognize the similarity in this Margaret Mead, anthropologist, quote: The natives are superficially agreeable, but they go in for cannibalism, headhunting, infanticide, incest, avoidance and joking relationships, and biting lice in half with their teeth.

One wonders, if she were still alive, what her views of this Democrat Party would be.





Welcome to our time.

Cut&pasteChic.