EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,223
- 17,822
- 2,788
Pretty obvious then why you are not versed in science.
LOL!!!
Found any land on Earth within 600 miles of a pole not in ice age yet??
YOU CANNOT REFUTE ONE WORD EMH POSTS HERE....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pretty obvious then why you are not versed in science.
Your silly questions have all been answered decades ago.
Oooooo, climate toddler…talk dirty coal to me!A person who pushes fraud in the name of science, who cannot answer the most basic questions on the subject, is not to be taken serious.
You are a liar, a coward, an intellectual flop.
Oooooo, climate toddler…talk dirty coal to me!
After you post any scientific organization that backs any of your claims we can have a discussion.Your science invalid parrot rear cannot answer basic questions either.
All you are here to do is claim you parrot the "experts"
without noticing the "experts" are completely refuted in USMB Environment section.
After you post any scientific organization that backs any of your claims we can have a discussion.
But you’re unwittingly to provide one and can’t explain why.
Again, why does science not back your claims?None of those "scientific organizations" can answer the questions put to you, but your beaked birdbrain still insists on parroting them, not noticing they've been completely refuted by their inability to answer those questions...
BAWK ON, MORON!!!
![]()
Again, why does science not back your claims?
When you have a flood, and the water is rapidly rising, the way to stop it is to remove all ways of measuring the level of the water. That is the present reasoning level of our "Conservatives". Of course, since the "Conservatives" hate all logic and science, this is to be expected.
“This facility is one of the largest sources of climate alarmism in the country.”
So still nothing.
Just what we expected from a climate toddler.
When you have a flood, and the water is rapidly rising, the way to stop it is to remove all ways of measuring the level of the water. That is the present reasoning level of our "Conservatives". Of course, since the "Conservatives" hate all logic and science, this is to be expected.
You keep predicting the bad future. Just when will your future happen. This is your problem. Others like you predicted disaster would happen in the past and nothing happened bad. Even Death Valley has cooled off.And do you envision on how to pay for all of that? One point here is that levees are constructed with maximum levels of the prior storms in mind. Unfortunately, those storms are nor what we will be getting in the future. For every degree of warming in the atmosphere, it will hold 7% more water vapor. But that water vapor only stays for 10 days or less, so the usual dumping places for that water get a lot more than in prior storms.
Which one in your mind is a climate science subject matter expert.
Also, is rfk junior an expert on virus, pathogens and vaccines? Can you post his accreditations.
All of my sources are subject matter experts.
You have lord muckington.
Again, why has no actual scientific organization backed your denial of AGW opinion?LOL!!!!
Since you are a parrot, everyone else must be a parrot too!!!
LOL!!!
FIND ONE OF YOUR "EXPERTS" WHO WILL ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS OR STFU AND ADMIT YOUR SIDE CANNOT ....
Apparently not.
Not on Faux
Not on RAV or OANN
What questions will the media never ask?
1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?
The Co2 Fraud is bilking America out of $200 billion per...
Again, why has no actual scientific organization backed your denial of AGW opinion?
Why can you source no actual climate scientist to back your denial opinion?