Other than the BIASED MSM supports Waters, what was the difference between her and Majorie Greene?

[Papageorgio]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

Please provide where anyone suggested "attacking a Capitol building"???

No one did, nor did I claim that someone did.

Was my post too complicated?

" She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops. "

Correct! She's not! Thanks!

You implied that Trump did, asshole.

Implication by omission, old tired tactic used by intellectually dishonest people.

 

[Mac1958]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

Please provide where anyone suggested "attacking a Capitol building"???

No one did, nor did I claim that someone did.

Was my post too complicated?

You wrote:"She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops."
I simply wanted to see the link that informs us as to who was telling anyone to "attack a Capitol building",etc.
When and who did the telling?

I'll say it again: No one did.

What she did not do was tell people to break the law. Attacking a Capitol building and injuring cops would be breaking the law.

Is that simple enough?

But who and when did some one attack the Capitol or injure cops? When did this happen and who told them to do so?
You made the implications that this happened.
Now Waters DID tell people in Minn.. (she crossed state lines to tell them)...
Waters said “I’m going to fight with all of the people who stand for justice, We’ve got to stay on the street and we’ve got to get more active, we’ve got to get more confrontational. We’ve got to make sure that they know that we mean business.”

Maxine Waters Tells Protesters to ‘Stay in the Street,’ Be ‘More Confrontational’ If Chauvin Acquitted

Representative Maxine Waters (D., Calif.) told demonstrators to “stay in the street” and become “more confrontational” if former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is acquitted of killing resident George Floyd. Waters arrived in Brooklyn Center, Minn., on Saturday to join demonstrations...

www.yahoo.com

So again, who encouraged people to attack (confront??) the Capitol and injure cops"?
I've offered the link where she said the above.
Where is your link? See you are doing what the biased, enflaming MSM does, out of context, "sources"... does GUESS not provide facts.

For the third time, no one did. I'm not sure why you're so hell-bent on derailing your own thread over such a small thing.

Looks like I struck a nerve, again.

 

[healthmyths]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

They think any black person saying anything they don’t like is violence.

Who is "they"? Curious. How many blacks were shot by cops in 2020? How many whites were shot?

 

[healthmyths]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

Please provide where anyone suggested "attacking a Capitol building"???

No one did, nor did I claim that someone did.

Was my post too complicated?

You wrote:"She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops."
I simply wanted to see the link that informs us as to who was telling anyone to "attack a Capitol building",etc.
When and who did the telling?

I'll say it again: No one did.

What she did not do was tell people to break the law. Attacking a Capitol building and injuring cops would be breaking the law.

Is that simple enough?

But who and when did some one attack the Capitol or injure cops? When did this happen and who told them to do so?
You made the implications that this happened.
Now Waters DID tell people in Minn.. (she crossed state lines to tell them)...
Waters said “I’m going to fight with all of the people who stand for justice, We’ve got to stay on the street and we’ve got to get more active, we’ve got to get more confrontational. We’ve got to make sure that they know that we mean business.”

Maxine Waters Tells Protesters to ‘Stay in the Street,’ Be ‘More Confrontational’ If Chauvin Acquitted

Representative Maxine Waters (D., Calif.) told demonstrators to “stay in the street” and become “more confrontational” if former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is acquitted of killing resident George Floyd. Waters arrived in Brooklyn Center, Minn., on Saturday to join demonstrations...

www.yahoo.com

So again, who encouraged people to attack (confront??) the Capitol and injure cops"?
I've offered the link where she said the above.
Where is your link? See you are doing what the biased, enflaming MSM does, out of context, "sources"... does GUESS not provide facts.

For the third time, no one did. I'm not sure why you're so hell-bent on derailing your own thread over such a small thing.

Looks like I struck a nerve, again.

No what you did was what the BIASED MSM does... called "Context". Why would you compare Maxine Waters exact words with the Jan. 6,2021 protest where to my limited knowledge NOT ONE person, let alone Trump who was
IMPEACHED by the MSM/Congress who NEVER extolled, encouraged, etc. to "attack the Capitol or injure cops"
What purpose was there in making up that comment in conjunction with Waters' exact words?
Present a biased position. You were comparing two situations ONE which is real and one made up!

 

[Papageorgio]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

They think any black person saying anything they don’t like is violence.

I have no problem with the rhetoric, I also don't have a problem when politicians use the word target, or aiming to get you, or we are going to kick ass and on and on. The issue I have is when people take them literally.

 

[JustAGuy1]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

She's standing in the MIDDLE of violence in MN, stop being as ass, it's EEXACTLY what she's calling for.

In your mind, sure.

When she says "stay in the street", and "we cannot go away", your mind perceives it as riots and violence.

When she says "fight for justice", your mind perceives it differently than when a Trumpster says it.

That's not my problem. That's just in your head.

What a little Prog lap dog you are.

 

[Mac1958]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

Please provide where anyone suggested "attacking a Capitol building"???

No one did, nor did I claim that someone did.

Was my post too complicated?

You wrote:"She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops."
I simply wanted to see the link that informs us as to who was telling anyone to "attack a Capitol building",etc.
When and who did the telling?

I'll say it again: No one did.

What she did not do was tell people to break the law. Attacking a Capitol building and injuring cops would be breaking the law.

Is that simple enough?

But who and when did some one attack the Capitol or injure cops? When did this happen and who told them to do so?
You made the implications that this happened.
Now Waters DID tell people in Minn.. (she crossed state lines to tell them)...
Waters said “I’m going to fight with all of the people who stand for justice, We’ve got to stay on the street and we’ve got to get more active, we’ve got to get more confrontational. We’ve got to make sure that they know that we mean business.”

Maxine Waters Tells Protesters to ‘Stay in the Street,’ Be ‘More Confrontational’ If Chauvin Acquitted

Representative Maxine Waters (D., Calif.) told demonstrators to “stay in the street” and become “more confrontational” if former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is acquitted of killing resident George Floyd. Waters arrived in Brooklyn Center, Minn., on Saturday to join demonstrations...

www.yahoo.com

So again, who encouraged people to attack (confront??) the Capitol and injure cops"?
I've offered the link where she said the above.
Where is your link? See you are doing what the biased, enflaming MSM does, out of context, "sources"... does GUESS not provide facts.

For the third time, no one did. I'm not sure why you're so hell-bent on derailing your own thread over such a small thing.

Looks like I struck a nerve, again.

No what you did was what the BIASED MSM does... called "Context". Why would you compare Maxine Waters exact words with the Jan. 6,2021 protest where to my limited knowledge NOT ONE person, let alone Trump who was
IMPEACHED by the MSM/Congress who NEVER extolled, encouraged, etc. to "attack the Capitol or injure cops"
What purpose was there in making up that comment in conjunction with Waters' exact words?
Present a biased position. You were comparing two situations ONE which is real and one made up!

I merely demonstrated that she didn't ask anyone to break the law. That's when you went full drama queen on me.

 

[hadit]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

When a politician uses heated rhetoric and within a short period of time one of their followers uses violence, they should expect to face criticism. Did Waters urge her listeners to remain peaceful? Doesn't sound like it. Basically, if we now get a not-guilty verdict and there's violence, she needs to be held accountable for ginning it up.

She should have said something peaceful like: We fight, we fight like hell, and if you don’t fight like hell you’re not going to have a country anymore....

And if she really wanted to be peaceful, something like they should march peacefully and patriotically. Haven't heard much peaceful from her and under today's standard, any violence that flows from a not guilty verdict is on her head.

 

[hadit]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

They think any black person saying anything they don’t like is violence.

Who thinks that?

 

[bripat9643]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

Please provide where anyone suggested "attacking a Capitol building"???

No one did, nor did I claim that someone did.

Was my post too complicated?

" She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops. "

Correct! She's not! Thanks!

You implied that Trump did, asshole.

Nope. You people are so sensitive.

I try to keep this stuff simple for you, but I will only dumb it down so much.

Nope. We just understand what Dims mean.

 

[bripat9643]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

Notice the recurring Prog talking points. Over and over and over....People have been injured and killed because of Progressive Socialist political agendas.

I wouldn't argue with that. Political ideology has killed millions over the years.

But that doesn't provide license to go hyperbolic and misrepresent the words of people whenever needed.

All intellectual dishonesty does is weaken your overall point. You help your opponents with it.

What could be more intellectually dishonest than one of your posts?

 

[bripat9643]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

Please provide where anyone suggested "attacking a Capitol building"???

No one did, nor did I claim that someone did.

Was my post too complicated?

You wrote:"She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops."
I simply wanted to see the link that informs us as to who was telling anyone to "attack a Capitol building",etc.
When and who did the telling?

I'll say it again: No one did.

What she did not do was tell people to break the law. Attacking a Capitol building and injuring cops would be breaking the law.

Is that simple enough?

True, but so would be burning down Portland and Seattle. So why did you bring up the capitol?

Who do you think You're fooling, douchebag?

 

[BS Filter]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

Please provide where anyone suggested "attacking a Capitol building"???

No one did, nor did I claim that someone did.

Was my post too complicated?

You wrote:"She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops."
I simply wanted to see the link that informs us as to who was telling anyone to "attack a Capitol building",etc.
When and who did the telling?

I'll say it again: No one did.

What she did not do was tell people to break the law. Attacking a Capitol building and injuring cops would be breaking the law.

Is that simple enough?

But who and when did some one attack the Capitol or injure cops? When did this happen and who told them to do so?
You made the implications that this happened.
Now Waters DID tell people in Minn.. (she crossed state lines to tell them)...
Waters said “I’m going to fight with all of the people who stand for justice, We’ve got to stay on the street and we’ve got to get more active, we’ve got to get more confrontational. We’ve got to make sure that they know that we mean business.”

Maxine Waters Tells Protesters to ‘Stay in the Street,’ Be ‘More Confrontational’ If Chauvin Acquitted

Representative Maxine Waters (D., Calif.) told demonstrators to “stay in the street” and become “more confrontational” if former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is acquitted of killing resident George Floyd. Waters arrived in Brooklyn Center, Minn., on Saturday to join demonstrations...

www.yahoo.com

So again, who encouraged people to attack (confront??) the Capitol and injure cops"?
I've offered the link where she said the above.
Where is your link? See you are doing what the biased, enflaming MSM does, out of context, "sources"... does GUESS not provide facts.

For the third time, no one did. I'm not sure why you're so hell-bent on derailing your own thread over such a small thing.

Looks like I struck a nerve, again.

No what you did was what the BIASED MSM does... called "Context". Why would you compare Maxine Waters exact words with the Jan. 6,2021 protest where to my limited knowledge NOT ONE person, let alone Trump who was
IMPEACHED by the MSM/Congress who NEVER extolled, encouraged, etc. to "attack the Capitol or injure cops"
What purpose was there in making up that comment in conjunction with Waters' exact words?
Present a biased position. You were comparing two situations ONE which is real and one made up!

I merely demonstrated that she didn't ask anyone to break the law. That's when you went full drama queen on me.

Neither did President Trump, so why was he impeached? You sick hypocrites.

 

[bripat9643]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

Please provide where anyone suggested "attacking a Capitol building"???

No one did, nor did I claim that someone did.

Was my post too complicated?

You wrote:"She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops."
I simply wanted to see the link that informs us as to who was telling anyone to "attack a Capitol building",etc.
When and who did the telling?

I'll say it again: No one did.

What she did not do was tell people to break the law. Attacking a Capitol building and injuring cops would be breaking the law.

Is that simple enough?

But who and when did some one attack the Capitol or injure cops? When did this happen and who told them to do so?
You made the implications that this happened.
Now Waters DID tell people in Minn.. (she crossed state lines to tell them)...
Waters said “I’m going to fight with all of the people who stand for justice, We’ve got to stay on the street and we’ve got to get more active, we’ve got to get more confrontational. We’ve got to make sure that they know that we mean business.”

Maxine Waters Tells Protesters to ‘Stay in the Street,’ Be ‘More Confrontational’ If Chauvin Acquitted

Representative Maxine Waters (D., Calif.) told demonstrators to “stay in the street” and become “more confrontational” if former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is acquitted of killing resident George Floyd. Waters arrived in Brooklyn Center, Minn., on Saturday to join demonstrations...

www.yahoo.com

So again, who encouraged people to attack (confront??) the Capitol and injure cops"?
I've offered the link where she said the above.
Where is your link? See you are doing what the biased, enflaming MSM does, out of context, "sources"... does GUESS not provide facts.

For the third time, no one did. I'm not sure why you're so hell-bent on derailing your own thread over such a small thing.

Looks like I struck a nerve, again.

No what you did was what the BIASED MSM does... called "Context". Why would you compare Maxine Waters exact words with the Jan. 6,2021 protest where to my limited knowledge NOT ONE person, let alone Trump who was
IMPEACHED by the MSM/Congress who NEVER extolled, encouraged, etc. to "attack the Capitol or injure cops"
What purpose was there in making up that comment in conjunction with Waters' exact words?
Present a biased position. You were comparing two situations ONE which is real and one made up!

I merely demonstrated that she didn't ask anyone to break the law. That's when you went full drama queen on me.

Neither did President Trump, so why was he impeached? You sick hypocrites.

These NAZI trolls just can't get it though their heads what colossal hypocrites they are.

 

[Mac1958]

 

[BS Filter]

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”

I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.

Please provide where anyone suggested "attacking a Capitol building"???

No one did, nor did I claim that someone did.

Was my post too complicated?

You wrote:"She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops."
I simply wanted to see the link that informs us as to who was telling anyone to "attack a Capitol building",etc.
When and who did the telling?

I'll say it again: No one did.

What she did not do was tell people to break the law. Attacking a Capitol building and injuring cops would be breaking the law.

Is that simple enough?

But who and when did some one attack the Capitol or injure cops? When did this happen and who told them to do so?
You made the implications that this happened.
Now Waters DID tell people in Minn.. (she crossed state lines to tell them)...
Waters said “I’m going to fight with all of the people who stand for justice, We’ve got to stay on the street and we’ve got to get more active, we’ve got to get more confrontational. We’ve got to make sure that they know that we mean business.”

Maxine Waters Tells Protesters to ‘Stay in the Street,’ Be ‘More Confrontational’ If Chauvin Acquitted

Representative Maxine Waters (D., Calif.) told demonstrators to “stay in the street” and become “more confrontational” if former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is acquitted of killing resident George Floyd. Waters arrived in Brooklyn Center, Minn., on Saturday to join demonstrations...

www.yahoo.com

So again, who encouraged people to attack (confront??) the Capitol and injure cops"?
I've offered the link where she said the above.
Where is your link? See you are doing what the biased, enflaming MSM does, out of context, "sources"... does GUESS not provide facts.

For the third time, no one did. I'm not sure why you're so hell-bent on derailing your own thread over such a small thing.

Looks like I struck a nerve, again.

No what you did was what the BIASED MSM does... called "Context". Why would you compare Maxine Waters exact words with the Jan. 6,2021 protest where to my limited knowledge NOT ONE person, let alone Trump who was
IMPEACHED by the MSM/Congress who NEVER extolled, encouraged, etc. to "attack the Capitol or injure cops"
What purpose was there in making up that comment in conjunction with Waters' exact words?
Present a biased position. You were comparing two situations ONE which is real and one made up!

I merely demonstrated that she didn't ask anyone to break the law. That's when you went full drama queen on me.

Neither did President Trump, so why was he impeached? You sick hypocrites.

These NAZI trolls just can't get it though their heads what colossal hypocrites they are.

They don't care. They're ignorant losers and pawns, just what Democrats need to stay in power.

 

[basquebromance]

if they impeached Trump twice, we should impeach Biden at least once!