Other than the BIASED MSM supports Waters, what was the difference between her and Majorie Greene?

“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”
I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.
Notice the recurring Prog talking points. Over and over and over....People have been injured and killed because of Progressive Socialist political agendas.
 
“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”
I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.
Notice the recurring Prog talking points. Over and over and over....People have been injured and killed because of Progressive Socialist political agendas.
I wouldn't argue with that. Political ideology has killed millions over the years.

But that doesn't provide license to go hyperbolic and misrepresent the words of people whenever needed.

All intellectual dishonesty does is weaken your overall point. You help your opponents with it.
 
“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”
I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.
Please provide where anyone suggested "attacking a Capitol building"???
No one did, nor did I claim that someone did.

Was my post too complicated?
You wrote:"She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops."
I simply wanted to see the link that informs us as to who was telling anyone to "attack a Capitol building",etc.
When and who did the telling?
 
“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”
I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.
Who told anyone to injure capitol cops or attack a capitol building? Mad Maxine, on the other hand, just told people to riot.
But she didn't. That's just something that your mind has created.
Of course she didn't...nor have you shown who DID the " telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops." That's what I'd like to know. Why would you make that comparison without the validation of your statement?
 
“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”
I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.
Please provide where anyone suggested "attacking a Capitol building"???
No one did, nor did I claim that someone did.

Was my post too complicated?
You wrote:"She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops."
I simply wanted to see the link that informs us as to who was telling anyone to "attack a Capitol building",etc.
When and who did the telling?
I'll say it again: No one did.

What she did not do was tell people to break the law. Attacking a Capitol building and injuring cops would be breaking the law.

Is that simple enough?
 
Remember what Obama said...
Obama " I want you to argue with them and get in their face!
Obama " “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,”
Obama "whose ass to kick‘ next – yes, Obama said that, too
So why did Republicans bring a knife?
Probably because "they" started a fire, threw frozen bottles of water, feces, etc. all the attributes of a "peaceful protest"?
 
“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”
I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.
When a politician uses heated rhetoric and within a short period of time one of their followers uses violence, they should expect to face criticism. Did Waters urge her listeners to remain peaceful? Doesn't sound like it. Basically, if we now get a not-guilty verdict and there's violence, she needs to be held accountable for ginning it up.
She should have said something peaceful like: We fight, we fight like hell, and if you don’t fight like hell you’re not going to have a country anymore....
 
“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”
I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.
Notice the recurring Prog talking points. Over and over and over....People have been injured and killed because of Progressive Socialist political agendas.
January 6th
 
“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”
I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.
They think any black person saying anything they don’t like is violence.
 
“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”
I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.
Please provide where anyone suggested "attacking a Capitol building"???
No one did, nor did I claim that someone did.

Was my post too complicated?
You wrote:"She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops."
I simply wanted to see the link that informs us as to who was telling anyone to "attack a Capitol building",etc.
When and who did the telling?
I'll say it again: No one did.

What she did not do was tell people to break the law. Attacking a Capitol building and injuring cops would be breaking the law.

Is that simple enough?
But who and when did some one attack the Capitol or injure cops? When did this happen and who told them to do so?
You made the implications that this happened.
Now Waters DID tell people in Minn.. (she crossed state lines to tell them)...
Waters said “I’m going to fight with all of the people who stand for justice, We’ve got to stay on the street and we’ve got to get more active, we’ve got to get more confrontational. We’ve got to make sure that they know that we mean business.”
So again, who encouraged people to attack (confront??) the Capitol and injure cops"?
I've offered the link where she said the above.
Where is your link? See you are doing what the biased, enflaming MSM does, out of context, "sources"... does GUESS not provide facts.
 
“We’re looking for a guilty verdict. We’re looking for a guilty verdict. And we’re looking to see if all of this [inaudible] that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd,” Waters said. “If nothing does not happen, then we know that we’ve got to not only stay in the street, but we’ve got to fight for justice, but I am very hopeful and I hope that we’re going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”
I think that she's part of the problem in general. I'm not a fan.

But I don't see anything there that is a problem. She's not telling anyone to, say, attack a Capitol building or injure Capitol cops.

"Confrontational" does not require violence. Sorry.
They think any black person saying anything they don’t like is violence.
You're one sick evil kunt.
 

Forum List

Back
Top