Origin of articles in Western European languages

What I define as the character of a Hun

You "define" what?

in such cases will, as a rule, have the opposite effect. When he gets hit, he will have a hormonal surge, he will instantly energize and start fighting furiously. Therefore, against the Hun, the taсtic of the first strike may, on the contrary, be a losing one. If you hit the Hun first, then you have to hit it for sure to turn it off, otherwise it will work against the attacker.

Good grief. Did you really never thought about to buy a cheap exchange brain from the Suebs of Siebenbürgen - or why else do you think they never developed draculonic operation methods in Transsylvania?

 
Using Common Sense, You Can Discover Our Common Language

SOMA means "body" and has nothing to do with the moon. The moon is related to MINUS (menshe) because it seems to keep getting smaller.

But HELL is related to HELIOS, thank you. HELIOS is also the root of YELLOW. The Arabs may have borrowed this sun god from the Aryans

Which Aryans? The hypothese "Aryans" from linguists of the 19th cenhtury?

and changed it to ALLAH.

"Yellow". Old English: geolwe - same word as the German word "gelb". Has something to do with Gold (=gold) and Geld (=money). "Helios" = sun (same root as astonishing as this seems to be). But in German has the word "hell" absolutelly nothing to do with the English word "hell" which is in Germany "Hölle" - a dark place - while "hell" means "light, bright, clear" in German.

And the word Allah = al-ilahu (allahu) = "the one god" comes from the Hebrew expression "eloah" - which exists also in the plural form elohim and has unfortunatelly not really to do with the Hawaiians, or has it? :lol:

 
An empire's success is spreading its power on other territories and controlling them. Military power is one among other elements of this success.

Is this not the same as to do murder and suicide on reason of fear? Where do you see "success" in this nonsense idea?




Know thyselve
- and the god within you!
Orcacle of Delphi
 
Last edited:
Which Aryans? The hypothese "Aryans" from linguists of the 19th cenhtury?
The Aryans are not hypothetical people, you idiot. They left behind many material traces, and written sources, languages and the like.

This is exactly the term "Indo-Europeans" fabulous, it does not mean anything definite.
 
Old English: geolwe - same word as the German word "gelb"

These are not Germanic languages, if we are not talking about Celts or Austro-Hungarians. If we assume that the Germanic ones were similar to the Slavic ones, then modern Germanic, English and French, with the opposite analytical grammar, came from the nothing. It is modern analytical languages such as English that are real Germanic, and "conservative Germanic" languages like Icelandic have nothing to do with Germans.
 
zaangalewa
All this confusion comes from the fact that the Germans began to call themselves Aryans. This was even before the Nazis, the anti-scientific term "Indo-Germans" was used there. In fact, the original Germans come from the Corded Ware culture and the Baltic cultures, they were never Aryans. Some modern Germans descend from the Aryans, but these are not historical Germans, but only Celts and Huns who came across the Danube.

It is from the pseudoscientific term "Indo-Germans" that the pseudoscientific term "Indo-Europeans" comes from. This is a ghost people who never existed, and all ancient Indo-European languages come only from Aryan.
This pseudoscientific picture was introduced by Gobineau. Or at least he is the most famous ideologue of "Indo-Germanism"

Once again: the historical Germans are not Aryans, and no one knows what "Indo-Germans" and "Indo-Europeans" are.
 
There were even countries with Aryan names. Arya to the east of Media, from which the name "Iran" comes and Aryavarta in India.
 
This country, between Media and Baktiana

5164825001_2e63a178d2_b.jpg


"Iran" is nothing more than a variant of the same Aryana
 
In addition, Media, Turan, the early Celts of the Danube cultures, Mittani, Bactria and Margiana are absolutely exactly identified as Aryan.
 
This forgery with "Germanic Aryans" arose due to the fact that romantics began to dig up the history of the origin of peoples, at the end of the 18-19th centuries. This was greatly facilitated by linguistics and religious studies. The Frankish elites were losing influence and in order to save the situation, they put forward racists like Gobino, who invented the tale that the Aryans were supposedly descended from the Germans. This "theory" was pure fake. But they still try to grab onto this straw, introducing vague terms like "IE"
 
The Bolsheviks tried to destroy the place where the Aryan culture appeared: the Andronovo region, near Chelyabinsk. They tried to flood these monuments.

And the Bolsheviks are almost the same people who created Germany, the "true Aryans" of the Bismarck empire.
 
It is generally widespread nowadays to assign other people's names and cultures. The Yakuts began to call themselves Sakas(Saha), the Evenki Mongols and Oirats, the Adigi were renamed Circassians, and so on. Nowadays, in general, there are few peoples who bear their historical names.
 
The Germans are trying to appropriate the history of the Sarmatians, and they tell tales about how they fought with Rome. In fact, the Rhine Germans were part of Rome, and the eastern ones lived in the forests of historical Prussia, obeyed their women, wore bast shoes and their nobility was engaged in trade.
The heroic sagas were written by the Old Norse peoples, in the Old Norse language, close to the Celtic ones, and the Germans have nothing to do with them.
 
The Aryans are not hypothetical people, you idiot.

All people of the past are hypothetical people. ONe problem in this context: They are as complex as we are on our own - wnd we do not even understand ourselve - except he os a god like you who believe in himselve and every opf thewhn absurde ideas as long as they seem to taste well.

They left behind many material traces, and written sources, languages and the like.

Do they? Give me a concrete source please and tell me why you call this people "Aryans" and why the Nazis spoke a totally idiroc nosnens inthsi context.

This is exactly the term "Indo-Europeans"

It's better to use the old expression "Indo-Germanic" instead of the modern expression Indo-European, because not all Europeans are speaking an Indo-Germanic language.

fabulous, it does not mean anything definite.

If Arans has not been only an idea then they had been ancestors of the Persians (Iranians). Don't trybot tell me now the absurde idiot Hitler had been a Persian.
 
Do they? Give me a concrete source please and tell me why you call this people "Aryans" and why the Nazis spoke a totally idiroc nosnens inthsi context.
Everyone knows that idiot. See the Mitannian, Vedic languages, the language of the early Avesta, from archeology you can study the Andronovo cultural community, Hallstatt, the cultures of northern India of the Vedic period, Tarim mummies and so on.
What the Nazis said were their problems. As I understand it, they, following Gobineau, wanted to appropriate the Aryan heritage, to write it down to the Prussians. The Prussians have nothing to do with the Aryans, as already mentioned above.
 

Forum List

Back
Top