Dante
"The Libido for the Ugly"
FOX News themselves do!Who says FOX news is not a credible source you? Each reader decides valid NOT just one. Source is fine, roll with it.
Fox News 'CIA Expert' Not A CIA Guy, Not An Expert - Wonkette
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FOX News themselves do!Who says FOX news is not a credible source you? Each reader decides valid NOT just one. Source is fine, roll with it.
Forbes at 4 and a 1/2 years AFTER it was passed and STILL failing. Its been nothing but on train wreck after another.
Who says we have to replace it? Nothing in law says that. If anything it goes against the law."One Third of ObamaCare Co-Ops Have Failed"
It's remarkable how most don't get it – willful ignorance, perhaps.
The issue isn't the ACA or whether it's 'successful' or not.
The issue is that there are far too many on the right who want to 'repeal' or 'defund' the ACA and replace it with nothing.
If you think the ACA is a failure, fine – but you need to also offer what you'd replace it with to achieve the goals the Act sought to realize, where 'doing nothing' isn't an option.
Who says we have to replace it? Nothing in law says that. If anything it goes against the law.
Quid Pro Quo... Show me a LINK to the LAW that SAYS either the United States is OBLIGATED/REQUIRED to provide YOU with healthcare OR quote me from the Bill of Rights where you have THAT right.Who says we have to replace it? Nothing in law says that. If anything it goes against the law.
You were going to give us some of those "many more examples," weren't you?
Quid Pro Quo... Show me a LINK to the LAW that SAYS either the United States is OBLIGATED/REQUIRED to provide YOU with healthcare OR quote me from the Bill of Rights where you have THAT right.
Sally Pipes a year and a half ago?Forbes at 4 and a 1/2 years AFTER it was passed and STILL failing. Its been nothing but on train wreck after another.
Four Years of Obamacare Failures Is Long Enough
Republicans say they would replace it. Get with it genius boiWho says we have to replace it? Nothing in law says that. If anything it goes against the law."One Third of ObamaCare Co-Ops Have Failed"
It's remarkable how most don't get it – willful ignorance, perhaps.
The issue isn't the ACA or whether it's 'successful' or not.
The issue is that there are far too many on the right who want to 'repeal' or 'defund' the ACA and replace it with nothing.
If you think the ACA is a failure, fine – but you need to also offer what you'd replace it with to achieve the goals the Act sought to realize, where 'doing nothing' isn't an option.
WTF? Are you talking to yourself? You appear to be because you keep going off topic as if you are having a one-sided conversation somewhereQuid Pro Quo... Show me a LINK to the LAW that SAYS either the United States is OBLIGATED/REQUIRED to provide YOU with healthcare OR quote me from the Bill of Rights where you have THAT right.Who says we have to replace it? Nothing in law says that. If anything it goes against the law.
You were going to give us some of those "many more examples," weren't you?
Take your time, now go fetch.
Quid Pro Quo... Show me a LINK to the LAW that SAYS either the United States is OBLIGATED/REQUIRED to provide YOU with healthcare OR quote me from the Bill of Rights where you have THAT right.
That wasn't my post. Why do you imagine I'm responsible for defending someone else's position?
Or are you just stalling because you don't even have one example, much less "many"?
I have posted one source from BEFORE it started and one 41/2 years in BOTH calling failure. What RIGHT or LAW says it has to be replaced? Simple question.Quid Pro Quo... Show me a LINK to the LAW that SAYS either the United States is OBLIGATED/REQUIRED to provide YOU with healthcare OR quote me from the Bill of Rights where you have THAT right.
That wasn't my post. Why do you imagine I'm responsible for defending someone else's position?
Or are you just stalling because you don't even have one example, much less "many"?
Right of Law? Who speaks like that in this day and age?I have posted one source from BEFORE it started and one 41/2 years in BOTH calling failure. What RIGHT or LAW says it has to be replaced? Simple question.
I have posted one source from BEFORE it started...
Former screen name is in my avatar. No Confederate though.Right of Law? Who speaks like that in this day and age?I have posted one source from BEFORE it started and one 41/2 years in BOTH calling failure. What RIGHT or LAW says it has to be replaced? Simple question.
You're that weird Confederacy gut come back under a different name, aren't ya?
Thought you reminded me of somebody
you should have met this guyFormer screen name is in my avatar. No Confederate though.Right of Law? Who speaks like that in this day and age?I have posted one source from BEFORE it started and one 41/2 years in BOTH calling failure. What RIGHT or LAW says it has to be replaced? Simple question.
You're that weird Confederacy gut come back under a different name, aren't ya?
Thought you reminded me of somebody
Just me just "FIRES".
A design is often reviewed and judged BEFORE its rolled out.I have posted one source from BEFORE it started...
How can something be a failure before it happens?![]()