One Term Donnie

[LA RAM FAN]

I don’t know if Trump will get re-elected. But the killing of Soleimani certainly won’t hurt. The guy is responsible for the death of hundreds of Americans, and Americans like when the President is tough against terrorists.

The only caveat to that is if tensions escalate dramatically. Iran will retaliate. If we get into a full-blown shooting war, then Trump could be in trouble because the nation doesn’t want it. But I doubt that will happen.

Totally stupid and uninformed, but typical of the dumb American who gets all his information from the government and billionaires.

Please read and refute any of this.
The US Government Lies Constantly, And The Burden Of Proof Is On The Accuser
The US Government Lies Constantly, And The Burden Of Proof Is On The Accuser

In reality there’s no evidence for any of the reasons we’ve been offered for why Iran needed to be provoked into an almost inevitable retaliation that Trump is currently tweeting will result in all-out war:

• The claim that Soleimani posed an “imminent threat” is completely without evidence, rumored to be “razor thin“, and entirely debunked in this excellent essay by Craig Murray.
• Mike Pence’s claim that Soleimani assisted 9/11 terrorists is so ridiculous that even the war-loving Washington Post dismissed it.
• There’s no proof that Soleimani directed the strike that allegedly killed a US contractor, or that that contractor even existed.
• There’s no proof that Soleimani was involved in any “attack” on any US embassy, leaving aside the obvious fact that a little graffiti on the walls wouldn’t justify his assassination if he did.
• The “hundreds of American deaths” line you hear regurgitated by everyone from Trump to Elizabeth Warren actually refers to Iraqis defending themselves from an illegal US invasion with some training from Iran. The claim that Iran was behind Iraqi bombs is withoutevidence and wouldn’t matter if it were true; claiming the inhabitants of an invaded nation don’t have the right to defend themselves is absurd, regardless of where they got their weaponry.
• The claim that Soleimani was “a terrorist” is only made because the branch of the Iranian military he commanded was arbitrarily designated a terrorist organization by the US government last year, a designation that any foreign government could just as easily make for any branch of the US military. He was actually a fearsome enemy of ISIS and al-Qaeda and played a massive role in halting the spread of ISIS.

you’re going to post the ramblings of some unknown & more importantly uncredentialed blogger...got it

Refute them, rather than be an ignoramus.

He cant,same as all tramp worshippers,he can only insult knowing you took him to school and checkmated him.LOL

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Let’s hope Americans vote out this warmonger in November. He has lost his mind.

Don't count on it, like I said earlier George W. actually started a completely unnecessary war using fabricated justifications and easily cruised to re-election in 2004.

Also consider that Donny probably isn't the real warmonger in this case, the REAL warmongers aren't elected they're appointed "advisers", career bureaucrats, private "contractors" and creatures living in "think tanks". Thus the problem isn't the douche bag we choose to put in the oval office it's the SYSTEM that surrounds the oval office that is the real source of our propensity for war.

The Donald is now yet another American president ensnared in the kind of tit-for-tat trap that is the modus operandi of Empire First.

Stockman certainly hit the nail on the head; "Empire First" should be the the new national motto it's certainly far more apropos than "In God We Trust" , after all if we trusted in God we wouldn't need to go gallivanting around the globe murdering foreigners just to please the cabal of warmongering psychopaths that inhabit the Federal Government.

NightFox you are making too much sense for the tramp worshippers to comprehend overloading their brains with pesky facts they cant refute being so brainwashed by our corrupt school system,they are on the verge of going into meltdown mode with the way fried their brains with these pesky facts. so much so they are having trouble avoiding a heart attack after you overloaded them with too many documented facts.LOL

 

[westwall]

Let’s hope Americans vote out this warmonger in November. He has lost his mind.

Don't count on it, like I said earlier George W. actually started a completely unnecessary war using fabricated justifications and easily cruised to re-election in 2004.

Also consider that Donny probably isn't the real warmonger in this case, the REAL warmongers aren't elected they're appointed "advisers", career bureaucrats, private "contractors" and creatures living in "think tanks". Thus the problem isn't the douche bag we choose to put in the oval office it's the SYSTEM that surrounds the oval office that is the real source of our propensity for war.

The Donald is now yet another American president ensnared in the kind of tit-for-tat trap that is the modus operandi of Empire First.

Stockman certainly hit the nail on the head; "Empire First" should be the the new national motto it's certainly far more apropos than "In God We Trust" , after all if we trusted in God we wouldn't need to go gallivanting around the globe murdering foreigners just to please the cabal of warmongering psychopaths that inhabit the Federal Government.

NightFox you are making too much sense for the tramp worshippers to comprehend overloading their brains with pesky facts they cant refute being so brainwashed by our corrupt school system,they are on the verge of going into meltdown mode with the way fried their brains with these pesky facts. so much so they are having trouble avoiding a heart attack after you overloaded them with too many documented facts.LOL

You sound like a bunch of sock puppets engaged in a giant circle jerk.

 

[jc456]

That’s right. He won’t be re-elected. His cowardly and enormously stupid cold blooded killing of the general has needlessly inflamed the region, and now Americans will die.

He campaigned on nonintervention, just as his two lying predecessors did, but now we know he too is a liar.

Donnie just made Sniify Joe look like a foreign policy expert. God help us.

Good job on questioning the official story regarding the killing of Soleimani, the war hawk establishment in Washington never bats an eye about telling the BIG LIE in order to get their way, it isn't the guy in the Oval Office you have to worry about, it's the military industrial complex and all its warmongering sycophants that inhabit Washington that are the real problem. Personally I don't buy the story coming out of Washington and being parroted by the media, too many things don't make sense about this.

However I think you're probably mistaken regarding the effect this will have on Donny's re-election chances; Georgey Boy campaigned on non-interventionism and no nation building yet started a war on blatantly false premises and cruised to re-election without a hitch, O'Nimrod wasn't much better, he talked a good game but when it came time to shed blood overseas he kowtowed to War Inc. like the good little politician he is and was easily re-elected.

All in all this probably helps Donny get re-elected since the American people just love it when a President goes all John Wayne and starts killing evil foreigners with smart bombs.

"We like war! We're a war-like people! We like war because we're good at it! You know why we're good at it? Cause we get a lot of practice. This country's only 200 years old and already, we've had 10 major wars. We average a major war every 20 years in this country so we're good at it! And it's a good thing we are; we're not very good at anything else anymore! Huh? Can't build a decent car, can't make a TV set or a VCR worth a fuck, got no steel industry left, can't educate our young people, can't get health care to our old people, but we can bomb the shit out of your country all right! Huh? Especially if your country is full of brown people; oh we like that don't we? That's our hobby! That's our new job in the world: bombing brown people. Iraq, Panama, Grenada, Libya, you got some brown people in your country, tell them to watch the fuck out or we'll goddamn bomb them!" -- George Carlin

He might get reelected, but whether valid or not, I would not underestimate how strongly the Democrats believe he is an absolute danger to our democratic Republic, to our Nation!!!

The electoral college might still elect him, but the people, will surely not.

The people are becoming more and more ignorant, particularly in populous, urban areas, which is exactly what the Democrats want. Heck, if they could just get illegals to vote they would have it made and they know that as well.

ignorant like you telling LIES you can refute any of what he said when you FAILED with shit on your face with

That’s right. He won’t be re-elected. His cowardly and enormously stupid cold blooded killing of the general has needlessly inflamed the region, and now Americans will die.

He campaigned on nonintervention, just as his two lying predecessors did, but now we know he too is a liar.

Donnie just made Sniify Joe look like a foreign policy expert. God help us.

Good job on questioning the official story regarding the killing of Soleimani, the war hawk establishment in Washington never bats an eye about telling the BIG LIE in order to get their way, it isn't the guy in the Oval Office you have to worry about, it's the military industrial complex and all its warmongering sycophants that inhabit Washington that are the real problem. Personally I don't buy the story coming out of Washington and being parroted by the media, too many things don't make sense about this.

However I think you're probably mistaken regarding the effect this will have on Donny's re-election chances; Georgey Boy campaigned on non-interventionism and no nation building yet started a war on blatantly false premises and cruised to re-election without a hitch, O'Nimrod wasn't much better, he talked a good game but when it came time to shed blood overseas he kowtowed to War Inc. like the good little politician he is and was easily re-elected.

All in all this probably helps Donny get re-elected since the American people just love it when a President goes all John Wayne and starts killing evil foreigners with smart bombs.

"We like war! We're a war-like people! We like war because we're good at it! You know why we're good at it? Cause we get a lot of practice. This country's only 200 years old and already, we've had 10 major wars. We average a major war every 20 years in this country so we're good at it! And it's a good thing we are; we're not very good at anything else anymore! Huh? Can't build a decent car, can't make a TV set or a VCR worth a fuck, got no steel industry left, can't educate our young people, can't get health care to our old people, but we can bomb the shit out of your country all right! Huh? Especially if your country is full of brown people; oh we like that don't we? That's our hobby! That's our new job in the world: bombing brown people. Iraq, Panama, Grenada, Libya, you got some brown people in your country, tell them to watch the fuck out or we'll goddamn bomb them!" -- George Carlin

yeah the establishment is way too happy with the donald for trying to start a war with Iran so they will reard him as they do all our corrupt presidents that are puppets willing to do thei bidding of their puppetmasters as donnie doing,he will be rewarded a second term for doing so as they always are just like warmongers Bush and Obama were.same thing will happen again.

excellent stuff you posted,i am afraid the trump worshippers wont read it though,they only see what they WANT to soo and are biased and totally not objective same as the Obozo worshippers were over their here as well.two birds of a feather these two groups are. neither side objective or nob biased as you and the OP are.

When did trump try to start a war?

 

[jc456]

I don’t know if Trump will get re-elected. But the killing of Soleimani certainly won’t hurt. The guy is responsible for the death of hundreds of Americans, and Americans like when the President is tough against terrorists.

The only caveat to that is if tensions escalate dramatically. Iran will retaliate. If we get into a full-blown shooting war, then Trump could be in trouble because the nation doesn’t want it. But I doubt that will happen.

Totally stupid and uninformed, but typical of the dumb American who gets all his information from the government and billionaires.

Please read and refute any of this.
The US Government Lies Constantly, And The Burden Of Proof Is On The Accuser
The US Government Lies Constantly, And The Burden Of Proof Is On The Accuser

In reality there’s no evidence for any of the reasons we’ve been offered for why Iran needed to be provoked into an almost inevitable retaliation that Trump is currently tweeting will result in all-out war:

• The claim that Soleimani posed an “imminent threat” is completely without evidence, rumored to be “razor thin“, and entirely debunked in this excellent essay by Craig Murray.
• Mike Pence’s claim that Soleimani assisted 9/11 terrorists is so ridiculous that even the war-loving Washington Post dismissed it.
• There’s no proof that Soleimani directed the strike that allegedly killed a US contractor, or that that contractor even existed.
• There’s no proof that Soleimani was involved in any “attack” on any US embassy, leaving aside the obvious fact that a little graffiti on the walls wouldn’t justify his assassination if he did.
• The “hundreds of American deaths” line you hear regurgitated by everyone from Trump to Elizabeth Warren actually refers to Iraqis defending themselves from an illegal US invasion with some training from Iran. The claim that Iran was behind Iraqi bombs is withoutevidence and wouldn’t matter if it were true; claiming the inhabitants of an invaded nation don’t have the right to defend themselves is absurd, regardless of where they got their weaponry.
• The claim that Soleimani was “a terrorist” is only made because the branch of the Iranian military he commanded was arbitrarily designated a terrorist organization by the US government last year, a designation that any foreign government could just as easily make for any branch of the US military. He was actually a fearsome enemy of ISIS and al-Qaeda and played a massive role in halting the spread of ISIS.

you’re going to post the ramblings of some unknown & more importantly uncredentialed blogger...got it

love how you try and dismis evidence you cant refute as ramblings. YOU are going to fall for the corporate controlled medias lies on this even though they have made lies this going back DECADES now? comedy gold,what a hypocrite.lol

Evidence? You wouldn’t know evidence if it hit you in the head.

 

[jc456]

I don’t know if Trump will get re-elected. But the killing of Soleimani certainly won’t hurt. The guy is responsible for the death of hundreds of Americans, and Americans like when the President is tough against terrorists.

The only caveat to that is if tensions escalate dramatically. Iran will retaliate. If we get into a full-blown shooting war, then Trump could be in trouble because the nation doesn’t want it. But I doubt that will happen.

Totally stupid and uninformed, but typical of the dumb American who gets all his information from the government and billionaires.

Please read and refute any of this.
The US Government Lies Constantly, And The Burden Of Proof Is On The Accuser
The US Government Lies Constantly, And The Burden Of Proof Is On The Accuser

In reality there’s no evidence for any of the reasons we’ve been offered for why Iran needed to be provoked into an almost inevitable retaliation that Trump is currently tweeting will result in all-out war:

• The claim that Soleimani posed an “imminent threat” is completely without evidence, rumored to be “razor thin“, and entirely debunked in this excellent essay by Craig Murray.
• Mike Pence’s claim that Soleimani assisted 9/11 terrorists is so ridiculous that even the war-loving Washington Post dismissed it.
• There’s no proof that Soleimani directed the strike that allegedly killed a US contractor, or that that contractor even existed.
• There’s no proof that Soleimani was involved in any “attack” on any US embassy, leaving aside the obvious fact that a little graffiti on the walls wouldn’t justify his assassination if he did.
• The “hundreds of American deaths” line you hear regurgitated by everyone from Trump to Elizabeth Warren actually refers to Iraqis defending themselves from an illegal US invasion with some training from Iran. The claim that Iran was behind Iraqi bombs is withoutevidence and wouldn’t matter if it were true; claiming the inhabitants of an invaded nation don’t have the right to defend themselves is absurd, regardless of where they got their weaponry.
• The claim that Soleimani was “a terrorist” is only made because the branch of the Iranian military he commanded was arbitrarily designated a terrorist organization by the US government last year, a designation that any foreign government could just as easily make for any branch of the US military. He was actually a fearsome enemy of ISIS and al-Qaeda and played a massive role in halting the spread of ISIS.

you’re going to post the ramblings of some unknown & more importantly uncredentialed blogger...got it

Refute them, rather than be an ignoramus.

He cant,same as all tramp worshippers,he can only insult knowing you took him to school and checkmated him.LOL

Nope, neverland is a movie location

 

[gipper]

I don’t know if Trump will get re-elected. But the killing of Soleimani certainly won’t hurt. The guy is responsible for the death of hundreds of Americans, and Americans like when the President is tough against terrorists.

The only caveat to that is if tensions escalate dramatically. Iran will retaliate. If we get into a full-blown shooting war, then Trump could be in trouble because the nation doesn’t want it. But I doubt that will happen.

Totally stupid and uninformed, but typical of the dumb American who gets all his information from the government and billionaires.

Please read and refute any of this.
The US Government Lies Constantly, And The Burden Of Proof Is On The Accuser
The US Government Lies Constantly, And The Burden Of Proof Is On The Accuser

In reality there’s no evidence for any of the reasons we’ve been offered for why Iran needed to be provoked into an almost inevitable retaliation that Trump is currently tweeting will result in all-out war:

• The claim that Soleimani posed an “imminent threat” is completely without evidence, rumored to be “razor thin“, and entirely debunked in this excellent essay by Craig Murray.
• Mike Pence’s claim that Soleimani assisted 9/11 terrorists is so ridiculous that even the war-loving Washington Post dismissed it.
• There’s no proof that Soleimani directed the strike that allegedly killed a US contractor, or that that contractor even existed.
• There’s no proof that Soleimani was involved in any “attack” on any US embassy, leaving aside the obvious fact that a little graffiti on the walls wouldn’t justify his assassination if he did.
• The “hundreds of American deaths” line you hear regurgitated by everyone from Trump to Elizabeth Warren actually refers to Iraqis defending themselves from an illegal US invasion with some training from Iran. The claim that Iran was behind Iraqi bombs is withoutevidence and wouldn’t matter if it were true; claiming the inhabitants of an invaded nation don’t have the right to defend themselves is absurd, regardless of where they got their weaponry.
• The claim that Soleimani was “a terrorist” is only made because the branch of the Iranian military he commanded was arbitrarily designated a terrorist organization by the US government last year, a designation that any foreign government could just as easily make for any branch of the US military. He was actually a fearsome enemy of ISIS and al-Qaeda and played a massive role in halting the spread of ISIS.

you’re going to post the ramblings of some unknown & more importantly uncredentialed blogger...got it

Refute them, rather than be an ignoramus.

He cant,same as all tramp worshippers,he can only insult knowing you took him to school and checkmated him.LOL

Nope, neverland is a movie location

One term Donnie. We all must do our part to make it so.

 

[easyt65]

Do we REALLY need to summarize what the Democrats are running on in 2020?

Reversing all the economic success

Taxing Americans back into economic slavery

The Green new deal outlawing fossil fuel and the internal combustion engine - immediately causing millions of Americans to lose their jobs, winning the war on Cow darts, and admittedly bankrupting America

Tax-payer funded 'free' medical care, housing, education, food, & jobs for illegals...

Private Health Insurance outlawed

Impeachment for Presidents you don't like...GOP ONLY

Stripping GOP Presidents of the power to defend the US and Americans but the return of being able to kill Americans abroad with drones

An end to / reversal of the great new trade deals acquired and a return to kissing the collective asses of Russia, Iran, & China


...there's more, but why bother?! That's enough to get Trump re-elected.

 

[playtime]

first off link?

rand paul & mike lee.

Why Obama, Bush, and Bibi All Passed on Killing Soleimani

LOL - you didn't even bother to watch, did ya? you asked a specific question: a link.

i gave them to you. now you give me a non sequitur, but that's ok - it doesn't change the fact that at least 2 (R)s will be voting with the (D)s to curb donny's impulsive destructive behavior.

BTW, you said the president backed off. I didn't see that link.

Here's the unclassified copy of Trump's memo to the Senate informing it of the Soleimani strike, which shows a huge loophole in his justification

Pompeo declines to present evidence of ‘imminent’ threat that led to strike against Iranian general

Pompeo sidesteps questions on ‘imminent’ threat from Iran's Soleimani

Pompeo again declines to present evidence of 'imminent' threat that led to strike against Iranian general - CNNPolitics

so where is the link that trump backed off his imminent threat?

"Trump's memo to the Senate, however, cited "an escalating series of attacks in recent months" by Iran and its regional armed allies "

So you think because it doesn't say imminent in it he backed off of it? too fking funny. I'm still waiting.

BTW, in the old days, cowboys and indians, who was the main indian target when the chief was riding in an attack?[/QUOTE]

lol... no 'imminent' threat. there wasn't any such claim in that letter. there wasn't any such claim in the briefing. if there was - shirley it would have been shouted from the white house roof with all kindsa bells & whistles. you haven't learned anything from 'iraq has WMD'? silly little flying monkey - you'll say & do anything for trump.

 

[playtime]

it does when it's not followed - just like how donny skated around it.

nice try, doesn't fly.

Killing a terrorist doesn't violate the Constitution.

well repeating something over & over doesn't make it fact. you & donny need to learn that.

repeating something over & over again is also straight outa goebel's book of propaganda - donny sucks at it & so do you.

well repeating something over & over doesn't make it fact.

Feel free to post your proof that it violated the Constitution.

The Constitution of the United States divides the war powers of the federal government between the Executive and Legislative branches: the President is the Commander in Chief of the armed forces (Article II, section 2), while Congress has the power to make declarations of war, and to raise and support the armed forces (Article I, section 8). Over time, questions arose as to the extent of the President's authority to deploy U.S. armed forces into hostile situations abroad without a declaration of war or some other form of Congressional approval. Congress passed the War Powers Resolution in the aftermath of the Vietnam War to address these concerns and provide a set of procedures for both the President and Congress to follow in situations where the introduction of U.S. forces abroad could lead to their involvement in armed conflict.

Conceptually, the War Powers Resolution can be broken down into several distinct parts. The first part states the policy behind the law, namely to "insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities," and that the President's powers as Commander in Chief are exercised only pursuant to a declaration of war, specific statutory authorization from Congress, or a national emergency created by an attack upon the United States (50 USC Sec. 1541).

The second part requires the President to consult with Congress before introducing U.S. armed forces into hostilities or situations where hostilities are imminent, and to continue such consultations as long as U.S. armed forces remain in such situations (50 USC Sec. 1542). The third part sets forth reporting requirements that the President must comply with any time he introduces U.S. armed forces into existing or imminent hostilities (50 USC Sec. 1543); section 1543(a)(1) is particularly significant because it can trigger a 60 day time limit on the use of U.S. forces under section 1544(b).
War Powers | Law Library of Congress

donny was REQUIRED to notify congress with in 48 hrs of that strike

he did not

donny was required to give a specific reason with verifiable evidence

he did not

only that it was an 'imminent threat'

it was determined that it was not & he et al have since backed off that 'reason'

going so far as to tell those congress critters that they should not question the order.

& hopefully there will be a joint resolution limiting donny's impulsive destructive behavior.

while Congress has the power to make declarations of war,

Ok. No one has declared war....(beyond the AUMF)

The first part states the policy behind the law, namely to "insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities,"

Our Armed Forces were introduced into hostilities, in 2001.

The second part requires the President to consult with Congress before introducing U.S. armed forces into hostilities or situations where hostilities are imminent

Again, since 2001.

The third part sets forth reporting requirements that the President must comply with any time he introduces U.S. armed forces into existing or imminent hostilities

Already introduced, since 2001.

donny was REQUIRED to notify congress with in 48 hrs of that strike

AUMF.

donny was required to give a specific reason with verifiable evidence

AUMF

Thanks. Nice try.​

& yet bi partisan resolutions are being passed limiting the 'prez's ' war powers.

again. tutt tutt - yer dear leader ain't the autocrat that he wants to be & apparently you do too.

 

[playtime]

nyet. seems you lack reading comprehension skills, you little poorly educated deplorable you..........

but she woulda never been so stuuuuuupid to go about it the way capt bone spur did, nor would ignorantly spew & brag about committing a war crime.

Right here.....you whiney little twat.

WOULDA NEVER means what?

NOR means what?

go back to school. fool.

She would have never committed a war crime nor bragged about it.

Does that sum up your claims?

i can't say she would or not - but certainly knows what a war crime is. donny is stuuuuuuuuuuuuupid & didn't know that hitting civilian cultural targets is a bozo nono according the the hague.

i can't say she would or not - but certainly knows what a war crime is.

Bombing Libya, overthrowing Khadifi, etc......without following most (any?) of the procedures in your post #507.

And then bragging about his death...….

BUT BUT HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hillary wasn't the prez, was she? why wasn't that brought up by the (R)s who hated obama & HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ?

did we bomb cultural sites over there as described by the UN/hague?

Libya and War Powers

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

but she woulda never been so stuuuuuupid to go about it the way capt bone spur did, nor would ignorantly spew & brag about committing a war crime.

Right here.....you whiney little twat.

WOULDA NEVER means what?

NOR means what?

go back to school. fool.

She would have never committed a war crime nor bragged about it.

Does that sum up your claims?

i can't say she would or not - but certainly knows what a war crime is. donny is stuuuuuuuuuuuuupid & didn't know that hitting civilian cultural targets is a bozo nono according the the hague.

i can't say she would or not - but certainly knows what a war crime is.

Bombing Libya, overthrowing Khadifi, etc......without following most (any?) of the procedures in your post #507.

And then bragging about his death...….

BUT BUT HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hillary wasn't the prez, was she? why wasn't that brought up by the (R)s who hated obama & HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ?

did we bomb cultural sites over there as described by the UN/hague?

Libya and War Powers

Then why were you lying about her war crimes and bragging?

Leave the poor old drunk alone.

 

[jc456]

Totally stupid and uninformed, but typical of the dumb American who gets all his information from the government and billionaires.

Please read and refute any of this.
The US Government Lies Constantly, And The Burden Of Proof Is On The Accuser
The US Government Lies Constantly, And The Burden Of Proof Is On The Accuser

In reality there’s no evidence for any of the reasons we’ve been offered for why Iran needed to be provoked into an almost inevitable retaliation that Trump is currently tweeting will result in all-out war:

• The claim that Soleimani posed an “imminent threat” is completely without evidence, rumored to be “razor thin“, and entirely debunked in this excellent essay by Craig Murray.
• Mike Pence’s claim that Soleimani assisted 9/11 terrorists is so ridiculous that even the war-loving Washington Post dismissed it.
• There’s no proof that Soleimani directed the strike that allegedly killed a US contractor, or that that contractor even existed.
• There’s no proof that Soleimani was involved in any “attack” on any US embassy, leaving aside the obvious fact that a little graffiti on the walls wouldn’t justify his assassination if he did.
• The “hundreds of American deaths” line you hear regurgitated by everyone from Trump to Elizabeth Warren actually refers to Iraqis defending themselves from an illegal US invasion with some training from Iran. The claim that Iran was behind Iraqi bombs is withoutevidence and wouldn’t matter if it were true; claiming the inhabitants of an invaded nation don’t have the right to defend themselves is absurd, regardless of where they got their weaponry.
• The claim that Soleimani was “a terrorist” is only made because the branch of the Iranian military he commanded was arbitrarily designated a terrorist organization by the US government last year, a designation that any foreign government could just as easily make for any branch of the US military. He was actually a fearsome enemy of ISIS and al-Qaeda and played a massive role in halting the spread of ISIS.

you’re going to post the ramblings of some unknown & more importantly uncredentialed blogger...got it

Refute them, rather than be an ignoramus.

He cant,same as all tramp worshippers,he can only insult knowing you took him to school and checkmated him.LOL

Nope, neverland is a movie location

One term Donnie. We all must do our part to make it so.

open borders, destroy jobs and stop tax cuts? yeah, run on that.

What was the stock market at today? 29,000 highest ever? yeah!!!!

 

[playtime]

WOULDA NEVER means what?

NOR means what?

go back to school. fool.

She would have never committed a war crime nor bragged about it.

Does that sum up your claims?

i can't say she would or not - but certainly knows what a war crime is. donny is stuuuuuuuuuuuuupid & didn't know that hitting civilian cultural targets is a bozo nono according the the hague.

i can't say she would or not - but certainly knows what a war crime is.

Bombing Libya, overthrowing Khadifi, etc......without following most (any?) of the procedures in your post #507.

And then bragging about his death...….

BUT BUT HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hillary wasn't the prez, was she? why wasn't that brought up by the (R)s who hated obama & HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ?

did we bomb cultural sites over there as described by the UN/hague?

Libya and War Powers

Then why were you lying about her war crimes and bragging?

Leave the poor old drunk alone.

i didn't. make more crap up cause you have no argument other than being loyal to a conman cause it feels good & is easier to accept than the fact you were duped.

 

[gipper]

you’re going to post the ramblings of some unknown & more importantly uncredentialed blogger...got it

Refute them, rather than be an ignoramus.

He cant,same as all tramp worshippers,he can only insult knowing you took him to school and checkmated him.LOL

Nope, neverland is a movie location

One term Donnie. We all must do our part to make it so.

open borders, destroy jobs and stop tax cuts? yeah, run on that.

What was the stock market at today? 29,000 highest ever? yeah!!!!

Go Bernie go!!! Terminate the con’s favorite welfare constituency...the Military Industrial Complex.

 

[jc456]

Refute them, rather than be an ignoramus.

He cant,same as all tramp worshippers,he can only insult knowing you took him to school and checkmated him.LOL

Nope, neverland is a movie location

One term Donnie. We all must do our part to make it so.

open borders, destroy jobs and stop tax cuts? yeah, run on that.

What was the stock market at today? 29,000 highest ever? yeah!!!!

Go Bernie go!!! Terminate the con’s favorite welfare constituency...the Military Industrial Complex.

simply amazing. wow

 

[basquebromance]

"I know how to fight and I know how to win. So help me fight and help me win." - Trump at Ohio rally

 

[ABikerSailor]

you’re going to post the ramblings of some unknown & more importantly uncredentialed blogger...got it

Refute them, rather than be an ignoramus.

He cant,same as all tramp worshippers,he can only insult knowing you took him to school and checkmated him.LOL

Nope, neverland is a movie location

One term Donnie. We all must do our part to make it so.

open borders, destroy jobs and stop tax cuts? yeah, run on that.

What was the stock market at today? 29,000 highest ever? yeah!!!!

Sorry, but your information is kinda incorrect. Granted, today the stock market saw 29,000 today, but it didn't close at that. Matter of fact, it closed at -133.33 down, with the final number being 28,823.57.

Stock Market News Live: Stocks end lower as Dow pulls back from 29,000 level after payrolls data

Stocks reversed midday and ended lower Friday, after hitting new record highs intraday. Geopolitical turmoil in the Middle East injected uncertainty into markets all week— which investors shrugged off as the Dow briefly set a new record above 29,000.

Nevertheless, the major indices ended the week positive. The S&P 500 rose 0.94%, while the Dow was 0.66% higher and the Nasdaq jumped 1.75% to close out a tumultuous week.

Here’s how the markets settled at the end of regular trading Friday:

• S&P 500 (^GSPC): -0.29% or -9.37 points to 3,265.33
  
• Dow (^DJI): -0.46% or -133.33 points to 28,823.57
  
• Nasdaq (^IXIC): -0.27% or -24.57 points to 9,178.86
  

 

[ABikerSailor]

Totally stupid and uninformed, but typical of the dumb American who gets all his information from the government and billionaires.

Please read and refute any of this.
The US Government Lies Constantly, And The Burden Of Proof Is On The Accuser
The US Government Lies Constantly, And The Burden Of Proof Is On The Accuser

In reality there’s no evidence for any of the reasons we’ve been offered for why Iran needed to be provoked into an almost inevitable retaliation that Trump is currently tweeting will result in all-out war:

• The claim that Soleimani posed an “imminent threat” is completely without evidence, rumored to be “razor thin“, and entirely debunked in this excellent essay by Craig Murray.
• Mike Pence’s claim that Soleimani assisted 9/11 terrorists is so ridiculous that even the war-loving Washington Post dismissed it.
• There’s no proof that Soleimani directed the strike that allegedly killed a US contractor, or that that contractor even existed.
• There’s no proof that Soleimani was involved in any “attack” on any US embassy, leaving aside the obvious fact that a little graffiti on the walls wouldn’t justify his assassination if he did.
• The “hundreds of American deaths” line you hear regurgitated by everyone from Trump to Elizabeth Warren actually refers to Iraqis defending themselves from an illegal US invasion with some training from Iran. The claim that Iran was behind Iraqi bombs is withoutevidence and wouldn’t matter if it were true; claiming the inhabitants of an invaded nation don’t have the right to defend themselves is absurd, regardless of where they got their weaponry.
• The claim that Soleimani was “a terrorist” is only made because the branch of the Iranian military he commanded was arbitrarily designated a terrorist organization by the US government last year, a designation that any foreign government could just as easily make for any branch of the US military. He was actually a fearsome enemy of ISIS and al-Qaeda and played a massive role in halting the spread of ISIS.

you’re going to post the ramblings of some unknown & more importantly uncredentialed blogger...got it

Refute them, rather than be an ignoramus.

He cant,same as all tramp worshippers,he can only insult knowing you took him to school and checkmated him.LOL

Nope, neverland is a movie location

One term Donnie. We all must do our part to make it so.

Well, apparently Bloomberg is committed to making Trump a one term president. He said he's going to keep his campaign going through November, even if he's not the nominee.

Bloomberg to fund sizable campaign effort through November even if he loses

WASHINGTON — Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s massive campaign apparatus and an army of some 500 staffers will march on through the general election in November even if he loses the Democratic nomination, campaign officials tell NBC News, shifting their efforts toward working to elect whomever the party selects to face President Donald Trump.

Bloomberg’s vast tech operation will also be redirected to help the eventual nominee, as Democrats struggle to compete with the vaunted digital operation built by Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale. Hawkfish, a digital company started by Bloomberg that’s carrying out his $100 million online ad campaign, will be retained through Election Day to help defeat Trump, the officials said.

 

[jc456]

Refute them, rather than be an ignoramus.

He cant,same as all tramp worshippers,he can only insult knowing you took him to school and checkmated him.LOL

Nope, neverland is a movie location

One term Donnie. We all must do our part to make it so.

open borders, destroy jobs and stop tax cuts? yeah, run on that.

What was the stock market at today? 29,000 highest ever? yeah!!!!

Sorry, but your information is kinda incorrect. Granted, today the stock market saw 29,000 today, but it didn't close at that. Matter of fact, it closed at -133.33 down, with the final number being 28,823.57.

Stock Market News Live: Stocks end lower as Dow pulls back from 29,000 level after payrolls data

Stocks reversed midday and ended lower Friday, after hitting new record highs intraday. Geopolitical turmoil in the Middle East injected uncertainty into markets all week— which investors shrugged off as the Dow briefly set a new record above 29,000.

Nevertheless, the major indices ended the week positive. The S&P 500 rose 0.94%, while the Dow was 0.66% higher and the Nasdaq jumped 1.75% to close out a tumultuous week.

Here’s how the markets settled at the end of regular trading Friday:

• S&P 500 (^GSPC): -0.29% or -9.37 points to 3,265.33
• Dow (^DJI): -0.46% or -133.33 points to 28,823.57
• Nasdaq (^IXIC): -0.27% or -24.57 points to 9,178.86

Didn’t Biden say we don’t have money in our hands? What the fk does he think the stock market is only his? You all hear trump and your brains fall out