One Of Trump's Unconstitutional EOs Is Being Raked Over the Coals By SCOTUS Tomorrow

[g5000]

Trump has put on a lot of theater for the rubes.

A lot.

One of those performances is EO 14160.

To satisfy the large crowd of bigots in the MAGA ranks, Trump signed an Executive Order on the proverbial Day One of his administration which unconstitutionally violated the 14th Amendment. Having never read the Constitution due to its big words, Trump thought he could get away with it.

So far, every court up the chain of command has slapped Trump's, Nazi Stephen Miller's, and third stringer traitor John Eastman's pointy heads down, and tomorrow the Supreme Court will do the same.

Enter your predictions here for what the score will be when the EO is struck down.

I predict 9-0 against the illegal, unconstitutional, bigoted, hateful EO.

You can listen to the sure-to-be-hilarious arguments tomorrow here:

LISTEN: Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump’s challenge to birthright citizenship

The Supreme Court is weighing whether to allow President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship to temporarily take effect in most of the country, even if they might ultimately be found unconstitutional.

www.pbs.org

 

[pknopp]

I'd have to hear their questions and replies to make a prediction.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Trump has put on a lot of theater for the rubes.

A lot.

One of those performances is EO 14160.

To satisfy the large crowd of bigots in the MAGA ranks, Trump signed an Executive Order on the proverbial Day One of his administration which unconstitutionally violated the 14th Amendment. Having never read the Constitution due to its big words, Trump thought he could get away with it.

So far, every court up the chain of command has slapped Trump's, Nazi Stephen Miller's, and third stringer traitor John Eastman's pointy heads down, and tomorrow the Supreme Court will do the same.

Enter your predictions here for what the score will be when the EO is struck down.

I predict 9-0 against the illegal, unconstitutional, bigoted, hateful EO.

You can listen to the sure-to-be-hilarious arguments tomorrow here:

LISTEN: Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump’s challenge to birthright citizenship

The Supreme Court is weighing whether to allow President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship to temporarily take effect in most of the country, even if they might ultimately be found unconstitutional.

www.pbs.org

I predict you will be butthurt.

 

[Crepitus]

Trump has put on a lot of theater for the rubes.

A lot.

One of those performances is EO 14160.

To satisfy the large crowd of bigots in the MAGA ranks, Trump signed an Executive Order on the proverbial Day One of his administration which unconstitutionally violated the 14th Amendment. Having never read the Constitution due to its big words, Trump thought he could get away with it.

So far, every court up the chain of command has slapped Trump's, Nazi Stephen Miller's, and third stringer traitor John Eastman's pointy heads down, and tomorrow the Supreme Court will do the same.

Enter your predictions here for what the score will be when the EO is struck down.

I predict 9-0 against the illegal, unconstitutional, bigoted, hateful EO.

You can listen to the sure-to-be-hilarious arguments tomorrow here:

LISTEN: Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump’s challenge to birthright citizenship

The Supreme Court is weighing whether to allow President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship to temporarily take effect in most of the country, even if they might ultimately be found unconstitutional.

www.pbs.org

I'm not willing to bet the Roberts court will uphold the Constitution.

I hope they will, but I fear they won't.

 

[SweetTea]

They are hearing several cases tomorrow. Hopefully they will slap down these activists judges who think they have the power to make executive decisions. They don't.

 

[g5000]

I'm not willing to bet the Roberts court will uphold the Constitution.

I hope they will, but I fear they won't.

Nah. It will be 9-0 and a boot up Trump's ass.

 

[g5000]

They are hearing several cases tomorrow. Hopefully they will slap down these activists judges who think they have the power to make executive decisions. They don't.

They have the power to strike down unconstitutional laws and EOs.

For centuries now.

Do try to catch up and stop listening to your lying, uneducated propagandists. You look stupid.

Oh, by the way. Were the Supremes "activist judges" when they repealed Roe V. Wade?

You really don't think this shit through, do you, moron.

 

[Wapasha]

They are hearing several cases tomorrow. Hopefully they will slap down these activists judges who think they have the power to make executive decisions. They don't.

If you are referring to these universal injunctions, there is no legal authority that allows them.

People just shop for a federal judge who agrees with their agenda. Then they bring a lawsuit to that particular judge's court. Then the judge rules in favor of the plaintiff and applies their ruling to cover the entire nation, or to force the president to conduct his authority the way the judge agrees with.

Over half of all injunctions since 1963 have been made against Trump. That's all we need to see in order to realize how political these injunctions have become.

We the people were willing to trust that our federal judges were be fair, impartial and only following the law. But it's clear that judges are abusing our trust and faith, and we need to put an end to the use of these injunctions.

 

[SweetTea]

If you are referring to these universal injunctions, there is no legal authority that allows them.

People just shop for a federal judge who agrees with their agenda. Then they bring a lawsuit to that particular judge's court. Then the judge rules in favor of the plaintiff and applies their ruling to cover the entire nation, or to force the president to conduct his authority the way the judge agrees with.

Over half of all injunctions since 1963 have been made against Trump. That's all we need to see in order to realize how political these injunctions have become.

We the people were willing to trust that our federal judges were be fair, impartial and only following the law. But it's clear that judges are abusing our trust and faith, and we need to put an end to the use of these injunctions.

Yes, hopefully the SC will smack them down tomorrow.

 

[sparky]

Enter your predictions

I'll wager the scotus will most likely opine towards the 14th as it has to the 2nd juxtaposed to modern times G5

~S~

 

[g5000]

Over half of all injunctions since 1963 have been made against Trump. That's all we need to see in order to realize how political these injunctions have become.

No, it shows just how much of a destructive lawbreaker Trump is. Trump is the worst, most criminally offensive, president in history.

I've seen your propagandists make that bullshit argument.

Try to think for yourself.

 

[Wapasha]

No, it shows just how much of a destructive lawbreaker Trump is. Trump is the worst, most criminally offensive, president in history.

I've seen your propagandists make that bullshit argument.

Try to think for yourself.

That's irony for you. Federal judges issuing injunctions that are not authorized by any federal statute, and it's Trump who you think violates the law?

 

[g5000]

That's irony for you. Federal judges issuing injunctions that are not authorized by any federal statute

Who is filling your head with this bullshit?

You really want to go down this road, fool? Once again, you aren't thinking these lies through.

, and it's Trump who you think violates the law?

Yes. Prodigiously. That's why the courts keep ***** slapping him, including judges HE appointed!

 

[Wapasha]

Who is filling your head with this bullshit?

You really want to go down this road, fool? Once again, you aren't thinking these lies through.


Yes. Prodigiously. That's why the courts keep ***** slapping him, including judges HE appointed!

Find the federal statute then, which allows one person to go judge shopping, file a complaint, and the judge can issue a national injunction to stop a president from executing his Constitutional powers. I'll wait. Pssst... there isn't one.

 

[g5000]

Find the federal statute then, which allows one person to go judge shopping, file a complaint, and the judge can issue a national injunction to stop a president from executing his Constitutional powers. I'll wait.

You mean like Trump judge shopping in Texas for his lawsuit against CBS which is headquartered in New York City?

Like that?

I told you to think your bullshit through, now didn't I.

 

[g5000]

Find the federal statute then, which allows one person to go judge shopping, file a complaint, and the judge can issue a national injunction to stop a president from executing his Constitutional powers. I'll wait. Pssst... there isn't one.

First, the Constitution. Read it.

Next this:

Rule 65. Injunctions and Restraining Orders

www.law.cornell.edu

There is no exemption for the president.

You're welcome. I hope you weren't holding your breath.

 

[MayorQuimby]

They have the power to strike down unconstitutional laws and EOs.

What's the point of having executive orders, if judges can just strike them down?

Who is filling your head with this bullshit?

You really want to go down this road, fool? Once again, you aren't thinking these lies through.

I think he brought up a valid point. You should try and address it in a manner that is consistent with an actual human being.

 

[MayorQuimby]

First, the Constitution. Read it.

Next this:

Rule 65. Injunctions and Restraining Orders

www.law.cornell.edu

There is no exemption for the president.

You're welcome. I hope you weren't holding your breath.

Why do you talk to him in such an antagonistic manner? He's just trying to have a discussion with you.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Trump has put on a lot of theater for the rubes.

A lot.

One of those performances is EO 14160.

To satisfy the large crowd of bigots in the MAGA ranks, Trump signed an Executive Order on the proverbial Day One of his administration which unconstitutionally violated the 14th Amendment. Having never read the Constitution due to its big words, Trump thought he could get away with it.

So far, every court up the chain of command has slapped Trump's, Nazi Stephen Miller's, and third stringer traitor John Eastman's pointy heads down, and tomorrow the Supreme Court will do the same.

Enter your predictions here for what the score will be when the EO is struck down.

I predict 9-0 against the illegal, unconstitutional, bigoted, hateful EO.

You can listen to the sure-to-be-hilarious arguments tomorrow here:

LISTEN: Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump’s challenge to birthright citizenship

The Supreme Court is weighing whether to allow President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship to temporarily take effect in most of the country, even if they might ultimately be found unconstitutional.

www.pbs.org

Ive no doubt it will be defeated 9-0, but truth be told, BRC was about slavery and not illegal immigration. The original intent of it has moved away from where it originally started. However, it's been how we've done things for so long, they will never change it.

 

[excalibur]

Trump has put on a lot of theater for the rubes.

A lot.

One of those performances is EO 14160.

To satisfy the large crowd of bigots in the MAGA ranks, Trump signed an Executive Order on the proverbial Day One of his administration which unconstitutionally violated the 14th Amendment. Having never read the Constitution due to its big words, Trump thought he could get away with it.

So far, every court up the chain of command has slapped Trump's, Nazi Stephen Miller's, and third stringer traitor John Eastman's pointy heads down, and tomorrow the Supreme Court will do the same.

Enter your predictions here for what the score will be when the EO is struck down.

I predict 9-0 against the illegal, unconstitutional, bigoted, hateful EO.

You can listen to the sure-to-be-hilarious arguments tomorrow here:

LISTEN: Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump’s challenge to birthright citizenship

The Supreme Court is weighing whether to allow President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship to temporarily take effect in most of the country, even if they might ultimately be found unconstitutional.

www.pbs.org

They're hearing an issue about nationwide injunctions only, there is no argument over birthright citizenship tomorrow (something the Court has never dealt with - Wong Kim Ark dealt only with a child of legal resident aliens).

​

Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should stay the district courts' nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration’s Jan. 20 executive order ending birthright citizenship except as to the individual plaintiffs and identified members of the organizational plaintiffs or states.​

Trump v. CASA, Inc.

www.scotusblog.com

Bye.