‘A Moral, Ethical, Legal, Constitutional Travesty’

[berg80]

trump is the last prez in the world you want to have with the ability to violate the constitutional rights of citizens unless or until he is blocked by a class action suit or by his SC.

 

[justoffal]

On Thursday, the Supreme Court takes up a deceptively simple legal question that happens to be one of the most consequential of the second Trump era so far: Can district court judges block executive actions throughout the whole country?

The use of so-called nationwide injunctions has been controversial within legal circles for years, but President Donald Trump’s second term has brought the practice to the forefront of American politics. Many of the administration’s signature initiatives have been blocked or temporarily put on hold as a result of nationwide injunctions, and Trump officials have expressed outrage and indignation at the notion that lower court judges can stymie their work — despite the fact that Trump and White House officials like Stephen Miller often sought or championed such injunctions against the Biden administration.

The oral arguments were prompted by a series of injunctions blocking Trump’s move to end birthright citizenship, though it is unclear whether or to what extent the justices will address the underlying merits of the executive order, which have been roundly rejected by every court and virtually every independent analyst that has considered the matter.

Partisan politics aside, the legal question about injunctions is a legitimately tricky one — even among experts with similar political outlooks.

To hash out this debate, we’ve convened two experts — both liberals, and both ardent opponents of Trump’s political program — who sharply disagree about nationwide injunctions. (The term, as we discuss, is a slight misnomer; the key legal question is whether courts can grant “relief” that applies to parties who are not litigating before them.)

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/05/15/district-courts-nationwide-injunctions-supreme-court-trump-00342252

Trump and allies celebrated court orders against Biden they now claim are ‘tyrannical’​

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/politics/trump-biden-court-orders

So........the regime is being hypocritical. Imagine my surprise. I doubt conservatives had a problem with this ruling from a district court judge being enforced nationwide.

Federal judge in Texas suspends FDA approval of abortion pill​

Federal judge in Texas suspends FDA approval of abortion pill

The ruling from U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in Amarillo could potentially upend access to medication abortion nationwide.

www.texastribune.org

All that aside, there's quite a bit at stake here. If there are valid legal arguments to be made on both sides it seems like a fait accompli as to who will prevail with a SC packed with ultra conservatives.

Either straighten out the problem or get rid of the districts altogether. There is only one supreme Court.... I'm actually pretty shocked that the decision didn't come down nine-zip. You know Goddamn good and well the only reason it didn't was to serve politics.

 

[BackAgain]

When I see a jumble of charged terms in a thread title by a troll like our OP, bug.80, I automatically assume that the opener is bogus and that the thread will be another piece of bug shit.

But upon opening this thread, I was surprised to see it bordered on a legitimate question. The question which has just been addressed by the SCOTUS ruling truly is a pretty clear and significant one.

May a US district court judge issue a nationally binding injunction affecting all of America based on a case or controversy over which the judge has some alleged “equitable” jurisdiction?

SCOTUS has now clearly answered that question (and properly so) with a decisive “no.”

 

[BackAgain]

trump is the last prez in the world you want to have with the ability to violate the constitutional rights of citizens unless or until he is blocked by a class action suit or by his SC.

Is there any President who you, bug, believe could have any ability to violate the constitutional rights of citizens?

Hopefully your answer is “no,” Yet, given your focus only on Trump, I guess we can understand why you’re such a troll as to only object to things (allegedly) done by President Trump.

Plus, of course, when a hack like you talks about Trump doing “unconstitutional” things, you can’t back it up. Your hyperventilation doesn’t amount to support for your premise or your conclusion.

 

[Clipper]

No other countries on this PLANET let pregnant women enter their territory and grant citizenship to their babies.
NONE.
It is national SUICIDE to let this continue.
The Framers never envisioned such a thing possible, and there MUST BE AN ADJUSTMENT to our laws to FORBID such insanity.

You MAGA cult dopes didn't give a damn about birthright citizenship until that malignancy in the W.H. made an issue of it because he's a corrupt racist no good pile of shit. You ***** would sell your own daughters into a whore house if he told you to do it.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

You MAGA cult dopes didn't give a damn about birthright citizenship until that malignancy in the W.H. made an issue of it because he's a corrupt racist no good pile of shit. You ***** would sell your own daughters into a whore house if he told you to do it.

It’s been an issue for about 50 years now. This should have never applied to anyone outside of the slaves. Two illegals can’t produce a citizen based on the location of the birth. That’s ******* stupid.

 

[Clipper]

It’s been an issue for about 50 years now. This should have never applied to anyone outside of the slaves. Two illegals can’t produce a citizen based on the location of the birth. That’s ******* stupid.

The Constitution says they CAN.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

The Constitution says they CAN.

It doesn’t. Two illegals are not in the jurisdiction of the US.

 

[SeaMajor7]

It’s been an issue for about 50 years now. This should have never applied to anyone outside of the slaves. Two illegals can’t produce a citizen based on the location of the birth. That’s ******* stupid.

The subversion of Marxist retardation has run its course.
It's all over now, baby blue.