Little-Acorn
Gold Member
Hater dupe claptrap. O-Care's now bringing much better mental health care. Actual progress- thanks to Dems OF COURSE.
Umm, O-Care has not started yet.
O-Care starts on Jan. 1st, 2014.
Please don't feed the trolls.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hater dupe claptrap. O-Care's now bringing much better mental health care. Actual progress- thanks to Dems OF COURSE.
Umm, O-Care has not started yet.
O-Care starts on Jan. 1st, 2014.
Correct.Like all shootings there is no winner.
Correct.Like all shootings there is no winner.
But when there's a good guy with a gun on the scene, there are far fewer losers.
Liberals pushing "gun control" laws, prevent this whenever possible.
And in a place where it's obvious that there are probably good guys on the scene with guns, the insane whacko doesn't attack at all. He wants to rack up huge body counts to make headlines for weeks after he's dead, and he knows that a good guy with a gun will likely prevent that. So he goes elsewhere and doesn't attack in the first place. And there are even fewer losers.
Unless liberals create a "gun-free zone" for him to do his work in.
I do not recall any libs on this board saying that a "trained" armed policeman in a school is a bad thing. Armed teachers, with one weekend of training, not so much.
Over in 80 seconds. Only one dead - the radical left-wing shooter. And all because someone other than the criminal was on site and armed.
Colorado's school shooting -- over in 80 seconds - CNN.com
Once again, real-world incidents prove that gun-free zones are simply victim zones and more guns means more security.
Over in 80 seconds. Only one dead - the radical left-wing shooter. And all because someone other than the criminal was on site and armed.
Colorado's school shooting -- over in 80 seconds - CNN.com
Once again, real-world incidents prove that gun-free zones are simply victim zones and more guns means more security.
Only the right-wing would consider it a victory that somebody died for nothing that day.
The victory will not be when we have more arms in schools; it will happen when it is virtually impossible for people like this shooter to get guns as easily as they do, proving yet again the failure of gun owners to secure and lock away their weapons.
Correct.Like all shootings there is no winner.
But when there's a good guy with a gun on the scene, there are far fewer losers.
Liberals pushing "gun control" laws, prevent this whenever possible.
And in a place where it's obvious that there are probably good guys on the scene with guns, the insane whacko doesn't attack at all. He wants to rack up huge body counts to make headlines for weeks after he's dead, and he knows that a good guy with a gun will likely prevent that. So he goes elsewhere and doesn't attack in the first place. And there are even fewer losers.
Unless liberals create a "gun-free zone" for him to do his work in.
If more guns was the answer we would be pretty safe wouldn't we? Yet there are lots and lots of shootings. hmmmm
The article in the OP states the shooter took his own life. The sheriff at the school had nothing to do with stopping him.
What am I supposed to be seeing here?
And you think he took his own life before killing anyone because he felt God in his heart? Really? (Psst - he killed himself because an armed individual had arrived to stop him).
It's amazing how you guys play dumb when the facts leave you without an argument...
So your saying the guy who shot himself was scared to be shot by the security guy? Really?
Glad you claim victory when some poor girl was shot. You gun nuts are sick. Like all shootings there is no winner.
And you think he took his own life before killing anyone because he felt God in his heart? Really? (Psst - he killed himself because an armed individual had arrived to stop him).
It's amazing how you guys play dumb when the facts leave you without an argument...
So your saying the guy who shot himself was scared to be shot by the security guy? Really?
Glad you claim victory when some poor girl was shot. You gun nuts are sick. Like all shootings there is no winner.
I'm not a gun nut. I'm glad an armed Deputy was able to respond. As long as we have a system that allows nuts to purchase arms at a moments notice I think it's a good thing to have armed police. The winners are those who this wackjob could have killed but didn't get a chance to.
Over in 80 seconds. Only one dead - the radical left-wing shooter. And all because someone other than the criminal was on site and armed.
Colorado's school shooting -- over in 80 seconds - CNN.com
Once again, real-world incidents prove that gun-free zones are simply victim zones and more guns means more security.
Over in 80 seconds. Only one dead - the radical left-wing shooter. And all because someone other than the criminal was on site and armed.
Colorado's school shooting -- over in 80 seconds - CNN.com
Once again, real-world incidents prove that gun-free zones are simply victim zones and more guns means more security.
Over in 80 seconds. Only one dead - the radical left-wing shooter. And all because someone other than the criminal was on site and armed.
Colorado's school shooting -- over in 80 seconds - CNN.com
Once again, real-world incidents prove that gun-free zones are simply victim zones and more guns means more security.
How did the criminal get a gun?
Over in 80 seconds. Only one dead - the radical left-wing shooter. And all because someone other than the criminal was on site and armed.
Colorado's school shooting -- over in 80 seconds - CNN.com
Once again, real-world incidents prove that gun-free zones are simply victim zones and more guns means more security.
How did the criminal get a gun?
Bought it legally. From what I've read he was not a criminal until the moment he entered school property with it.
How did the criminal get a gun?
Bought it legally. From what I've read he was not a criminal until the moment he entered school property with it.
Yeah, ain't that always a problem, not being a criminal until commiting a crime.
Over in 80 seconds. Only one dead - the radical left-wing shooter. And all because someone other than the criminal was on site and armed.
Colorado's school shooting -- over in 80 seconds - CNN.com
Once again, real-world incidents prove that gun-free zones are simply victim zones and more guns means more security.
What part of the 2nd Amendment don't YOU understand velveetacheese?Over in 80 seconds. Only one dead - the radical left-wing shooter. And all because someone other than the criminal was on site and armed.
Colorado's school shooting -- over in 80 seconds - CNN.com
Once again, real-world incidents prove that gun-free zones are simply victim zones and more guns means more security.
He only had a shotgun. Were he armed like Adam Lanza, the story would have been different.
For the millionth time, liberals support gun control . What part of that do you two digit IQ gomers get lost in?