What the Right Wing Disinformation Machine Got Wrong About Brown U Shooting: Everything

[HikerGuy83]

Rittenhouse is not guilty of murder you moron THAt is what the evidence PROVES

We all know that.

Fart-face (gas bag) Crepitus is just trolling you.

He knows that Kyle was well within his rights to defend himself against two attackers.

But Fart-face calls it murder. Not even a credible claim.

 

[HikerGuy83]

View attachment 1196522



If you believed any of it, or thought it might be legitimate, you'd be a fool.

Were there any links to the claims that were made or were they just made?

So I read your references like the first one: Which was linked to a post where it was stated that "It was reported that the shooter....blah blah blah blahl." And a link was provided that had that in there.

So you are basically saying he stated something untrue when he was, in fact, just quoting a report and he stated he was doing it.

You think you are sooooooooo clever.

No response.

And yet he continues to yammer about people being "lost".

What an incredible irony.

 

[Crepitus]

We all know that.

Fart-face (gas bag) Crepitus is just trolling you.

He knows that Kyle was well within his rights to defend himself against two attackers.

But Fart-face calls it murder. Not even a credible claim.

No, he's a murderer.

 

[80zephyr]

Nope, and they don't need to.

Do a real background check, and hold gun sellers liable when they sell a gun to a crazy person, and poof, you will be AMAZED how quickly this shit gets cleaned up.

How does a seller know if a person is crazy? The government already does a background check.

 

[JoeB131]

How does a seller know if a person is crazy? The government already does a background check.

The government does a half-ass background check because the NRA limited what they could look into.

I'm all for privatizing background checks. Let the Gun Industry run them.

And if they get it wrong, 10 figure settlements.

I promise you, they'd do real background checks like the banks or employers do.

 

[citygator]

View attachment 1196522



If you believed any of it, or thought it might be legitimate, you'd be a fool.

Were there any links to the claims that were made or were they just made?

So I read your references like the first one: Which was linked to a post where it was stated that "It was reported that the shooter....blah blah blah blahl." And a link was provided that had that in there.

So you are basically saying he stated something untrue when he was, in fact, just quoting a report and he stated he was doing it.

You think you are sooooooooo clever.

You’re kidding right? The thread is about the right wing disinformation machine. Says in the title. It’s bigger than one poster copying and pasting a tweet. It’s everything that led to it as well.


By the way. Trump is a homosexual gay boy lover. You see, it was in a tweet and according to you that’s just a report I am quoting.

 

[HikerGuy83]

You’re kidding right? The thread is about the right wing disinformation machine. Says in the title. It’s bigger than one poster copying and pasting a tweet. It’s everything that led to it as well.

As I pointed out in my original post, your first "example" is garbage. The people you ascribe it to are very clear that they are passing along some thing that was "reported" and they had a link to show it.

But you accuse them of disinformation. Total bald-faced BS

 

[citygator]

As I pointed out in my original post, your first "example" is garbage. The people you ascribe it to are very clear that they are passing along some thing that was "reported" and they had a link to show it.

But you accuse them of disinformation. Total bald-faced BS

That is exactly what disinformation is genius. Someone posts a bogus story and it is passed around and repeated. What are you arguing? That posting a bogus story isnt spreading disinformation? Good luck with that argument.

 

[HikerGuy83]

That is exactly what disinformation is genius.

Just like this post......moron.

You stated that the claim was started by.....a poster. It wasn't. He was passing information along. His starting it was your support argument for you jackass thread title accusing the right wing of disinformation.

NOBODY needs to convince me that that web should just be called a bag of lies. For over two decades, when someone says we live in the "information age", I counter that we live in the "disinformation age".

It's your claim that is the disinformation here. He DID NOT START THAT CLAIM. He reported it.

Someone posts a bogus story and it is passed around and repeated.

That's not what you said....you said "started by....." I thought O.K. I'll bite. Took about 30 seconds to realize, once again, you are one sorry liar.

What are you arguing?

Guess?

That posting a bogus story isnt spreading disinformation?

You have proof that he knew it was a so-called "bogus story" when he posted it? If so, let's see it. Otherwise, you are using conclusion to prove the argument. In other words, you are twisting things to fit the narrative you crap out all over the place. GFY twice.

Good luck with that argument.

Wasn't hard at all. Generally isn't with you.

 

[HikerGuy83]

The thread is about the right wing disinformation machine.

When you posted your OP, you basically called those posters "the machine" in this case.

At least in the first case, you don't present anything that says he knew it was bogus when it was passed along. And he didn't even report it as fact. He said "it has been reported". I know how to read those words.

Do you need someone to explain them to you.

 

[HikerGuy83]

You’re kidding right?

 

[HikerGuy83]

The killer did not shout "Allahu Akbar!" - started by @Sayaras

His post posed the question.

He made the statement.....

Several media outlets quoted students.....

This was from Newsweek.

This was posted next to a screengrab of an article by local government news outlet The Center Square, which reported how, “several media outlets quoted students and other witnesses saying that the shooter yelled "Allahu Akbar" before opening fire in the building.”

Did Brown shooter yell "allahu akbar" before firing? What we know

A search continues for a gunman who killed two students.

www.newsweek.com

Newsweeks article heading.....the same Sayaras' OP.

Asking a question.

So you are wrong twice.

And your whole OP is bullshit.

You've just proved that yourself.

It's in several news reports....again stated as allegedly.

BTW: Just what proof do you have that the shooter didn't yell that?

From a web source......

On Monday, Providence Police Chief Oscar Perez Jr. repeatedly declined to confirm whether the shooter shouted anything before opening fire, even as reporters pressed him repeatedly about reports circulating outside the official briefings. During the press conference, a reporter asked point-blank whether the suspect “yelled something right before his shot came in.”

Perez shut that line of inquiry down immediately, responding, “That’s part of the investigation,” he said.

The reporter explained the relevance of the question, noting that in past cases, verbal clues helped identify suspects. “It’s possible a friend or family member might recognize if the person said something that was significant,” the reporter said.

So, while I don't trust the web, I don't see anything that says it wasn't potentially shouted.

And yet you claim it wasn't. Where you there? Hmmmmm

And the poster who started that thread didn't claim it was.

And who is the right wing machine in that case.

Let's hear it clucky.

 

[HikerGuy83]

The killer did not target Ella Cook. - started by @DonGlock26 and @Votto

What proof do you have that she was NOT TARGETED?

 

[HikerGuy83]

Their conspiracy theories were fabricated and were wrong from top to bottom.

How do you know all this when I can't find anything that backs up your claims?

What do you know that we don't?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes, he is.

No he is not
He acted in self defense and you can cite no evidence to the contrary

You are a proven liar like that chicken hawk Joe

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

So now that Ella Cook was just the 15,000th victim of gun violence this year and not the second or third victim of left wing violence or the 30th of right wing violence the right wing outrage machine no longer cares about her death. Her twitter mentions plummeted once the shooter and his motivations became known.

This brings us to account for what the right wing disinformation machine got wrong about the Brown Shooting: EVERYTHING

It's remarkable how badly the RW accounts that ginned up hysteria around the Brown shooting were wrong about everything both on social media and on here.

• The killer did not shout "Allahu Akbar!" - started by Sayaras
• The killer did not target Ella Cook. - started by DonGlock26 and Votto
• The killer did not shoot up that economics class because it was taught by a Jewish professor.
• The killer did not shoot up Brown because of its Israel policies - started by Robert Urbanek
• The killer was not a Palestinian student, or Muslim. Suggested by so many people its hard to @ them all.
• Brown University did not cover up evidence related to the killing in an attempt to protect a political hit or one of its students. Wild Bill Kelsoe
• Nuno Loureiro, the MIT professor, was not killed because he was Jewish or made pro-Israel statements. In fact, there's no evidence he was Jewish.
• Their conspiracy theories were fabricated and were wrong from top to bottom.

The people who are wrong about everything are gonna tell you.The truth

Lol

 

[Lesh]

His post posed the question.

He made the statement.....

Several media outlets quoted students.....

This was from Newsweek.

This was posted next to a screengrab of an article by local government news outlet The Center Square, which reported how, “several media outlets quoted students and other witnesses saying that the shooter yelled "Allahu Akbar" before opening fire in the building.”

Did Brown shooter yell "allahu akbar" before firing? What we know

A search continues for a gunman who killed two students.

www.newsweek.com

Newsweeks article heading.....the same Sayaras' OP.

Asking a question.

So you are wrong twice.

And your whole OP is bullshit.

You've just proved that yourself.

It's in several news reports....again stated as allegedly.

BTW: Just what proof do you have that the shooter didn't yell that?

From a web source......

On Monday, Providence Police Chief Oscar Perez Jr. repeatedly declined to confirm whether the shooter shouted anything before opening fire, even as reporters pressed him repeatedly about reports circulating outside the official briefings. During the press conference, a reporter asked point-blank whether the suspect “yelled something right before his shot came in.”

Perez shut that line of inquiry down immediately, responding, “That’s part of the investigation,” he said.

The reporter explained the relevance of the question, noting that in past cases, verbal clues helped identify suspects. “It’s possible a friend or family member might recognize if the person said something that was significant,” the reporter said.

So, while I don't trust the web, I don't see anything that says it wasn't potentially shouted.

And yet you claim it wasn't. Where you there? Hmmmmm

And the poster who started that thread didn't claim it was.

And who is the right wing machine in that case.

Let's hear it clucky.

Hey stupid, Newsweek noted that the CLAIM that Allah Akbar had been shouted came from an X post by “noted right winger Laura Loomer”

Loomer not Newsweek is the source

So be careful about believing shit from nut jobs like Loomer

 

[Crepitus]

No he is not
He acted in self defense and you can cite no evidence to the contrary

You are a proven liar like that chicken hawk Joe

He left his home town, acquired a rifle illegally, and went looking for someone to shoot.

That's evidence the court ignored for some reason.

 

[JoeB131]

He left his home town, acquired a rifle illegally, and went looking for someone to shoot.

That's evidence the court ignored for some reason.

All true. This judge, for some reason, took it upon himself to undermine the prosecutors at every turn.

Whether it be dropping the gun charges, or excluding taped evidence of Rittenhouse's racism and bad behavior, or telling the court they should applaud a defense witness. He didn't even allow the people Weepy McFlopsweat shot to be called "Victims"

He did everything short of giving Rittenhouse a hug.

 

[Crepitus]

All true. This judge, for some reason, took it upon himself to undermine the prosecutors at every turn.

Whether it be dropping the gun charges, or excluding taped evidence of Rittenhouse's racism and bad behavior, or telling the court they should applaud a defense witness. He didn't even allow the people Weepy McFlopsweat shot to be called "Victims"

He did everything short of giving Rittenhouse a hug.

Ayup. That whole trail was a sham designed specifically to give the RWNJs some kinda hearo and make the protests out to be evil.