Once again conservative policy vindicated and liberal policy PROVEN incompetent

Over in 80 seconds. Only one dead - the radical left-wing shooter. And all because someone other than the criminal was on site and armed.

Colorado's school shooting -- over in 80 seconds - CNN.com

Once again, real-world incidents prove that gun-free zones are simply victim zones and more guns means more security.

Yes, out of all mass shootings in the past, this one example of another person conveniently carrying a gun at the same time is justification for you gun nuts to do whatever you want.

Why do you add things that are not true?
Gun owners do not do whatever they want. They follow the laws.

You know regardless what one thinks of gun laws, this OP is not at all an argument against them. It sure as hell isn't proof of anything. Come on, guys. Get real.
 
Last edited:
Yes, out of all mass shootings in the past, this one example of another person conveniently carrying a gun at the same time is justification for you gun nuts to do whatever you want.

You left out the dozens of examples where mass shootings started, and there was NO good guy with a gun there to do anything about it. And so the killings went on and on.

And do you know what? The killers planned it that way. There's a reason why the killers, no matter how insane, virtually never shoot up a police station or gun show or rifle range. They know the nationwide fear, horror, and huge body count they want, is a lot harder to achieve when there's someone who can shoot back.

Don't worry. Conservatives take ALL the shootings into account, not just the rare one where the shooter goofs and attacks a place where there's a good guy with a gun nearby.

And the results look very bad for the mewling liberals who want to disarm law-abiding people. Virtually every time.

Tell me: IN all the MANY instances where a nutcase attacks a place where some mewling liberal has made a rule disarming the law-abiding (schools, post offices, govt buildings, shopping centers with "gun-free zone" signs etc.)....

....has the mewling liberal EVER been held partially accountable for the dead and injured he prevented from defending themselves?

Has anyone ever pointed out that, while a dozen people were getting mowed down by some crazy, it is partly the mewling liberal's fault, that nobody in the school or shopping center or post office was able to resist?

Has anybody asked the mewling liberal why he set up a zone where the crazy could be very confident that he could go on killing and killing without interruption, and so enabled the crazy's spree of mass murder?
 
Hater dupe claptrap. O-Care's now bringing much better mental health care. Actual progress- thanks to Dems OF COURSE.

Dickweed post. You didn't even respond to the article.

You are, by far, one of the three most ignorant individuals to post on this board.
 
Yes, out of all mass shootings in the past, this one example of another person conveniently carrying a gun at the same time is justification for you gun nuts to do whatever you want.

Why do you add things that are not true?
Gun owners do not do whatever they want. They follow the laws.

You know regardless what one thinks of gun laws, this OP is not at all an argument against them. It sure as hell isn't proof of anything. Come on, guys. Get real.

In the face of indisputable evidence (armed individual on site caused the incident to end after only 80 seconds and with the death of only ONE person - the homicidal maniac) you have no intelligent response and are sniveling with "come on, guys" like a child :lol:

"Come on, guys" - gee, what an intelligent response. Why can't you just be a big boy and admit what you can't even attempt to deny? eusa_doh:
 
Over in 80 seconds. Only one dead - the radical left-wing shooter. And all because someone other than the criminal was on site and armed.

Colorado's school shooting -- over in 80 seconds - CNN.com

Once again, real-world incidents prove that gun-free zones are simply victim zones and more guns means more security.

He was really ready to give it all he had. Thank heavens for that Deputy. The kid had not only the shotgun, but a machete and molotov cocktails.

So the Deputy was there in 80 seconds? 80 seconds? You sure?

Something is seriously wrong with you.
 
Over in 80 seconds. Only one dead - the radical left-wing shooter. And all because someone other than the criminal was on site and armed.

Colorado's school shooting -- over in 80 seconds - CNN.com

Once again, real-world incidents prove that gun-free zones are simply victim zones and more guns means more security.

He was really ready to give it all he had. Thank heavens for that Deputy. The kid had not only the shotgun, but a machete and molotov cocktails.

So the Deputy was there in 80 seconds? 80 seconds? You sure?

Something is seriously wrong with you.

Yes 80 seconds, you demdupe.
 
Over in 80 seconds. Only one dead - the radical left-wing shooter. And all because someone other than the criminal was on site and armed.

Colorado's school shooting -- over in 80 seconds - CNN.com

Once again, real-world incidents prove that gun-free zones are simply victim zones and more guns means more security.

He was really ready to give it all he had. Thank heavens for that Deputy. The kid had not only the shotgun, but a machete and molotov cocktails.

So the Deputy was there in 80 seconds? 80 seconds? You sure?

Something is seriously wrong with you.

He didn't "get there" in 80 seconds - it was OVER in 80 seconds because he was on site to begin with. This is what happens when you make sure guns are in the hands of good guys - tragedies are avoided.

But hey, keep creating victim zones like Sandy Hook! The blood is all over your hands thanks to the typical profoundly ignorant Dumbocrats policies.
 
Over in 80 seconds. Only one dead - the radical left-wing shooter. And all because someone other than the criminal was on site and armed.

Colorado's school shooting -- over in 80 seconds - CNN.com

Once again, real-world incidents prove that gun-free zones are simply victim zones and more guns means more security.
I'm curious, do you ever post anything except trash? You have the makings of a full time TROLL.

In other words [MENTION=35790]ron4342[/MENTION], you have no intelligent response for a situation which proves your irrational gun policies are ignorant and failed? Exactly.
 
The article in the OP states the shooter took his own life. The sheriff at the school had nothing to do with stopping him.

What am I supposed to be seeing here?

You're seeing why USMB conservatives can't be taken seriously.

Of all the thread's on USMB where Dumbocrats fail miserably, this thread is by far the liberals worst nightmare. In more than 24 hours now you moron's have not been able to add even one comment of value or even make a desperate argument. You've literally waved the white flag while pitching a hissy-fit doing so. Lets recap the sad Dumbocrats comments posted out of desperation at the realization that the facts show their irrational policies have caused mass-murder:

"Pub-hater dupe" (nothing of value there)
"Trash" (nothing of value there)
"Troll" (nothing of value there)
"What am I supposed to see here?" (Oh, I don't know - how about reality for once in your ignorant life as useful idiot to your Dumbocrat masters?)
"You're seeing why conservatives can't be taken seriously" (you shouldn't take people seriously who post links to current events which indisputably occurred? Now there is some Dumbocrat "logic" for you :cuckoo:)

Wow - that is one remarkable list of failed responses. If that's the best you Dumbocrats can do, why even waste your time posting (not that time is an issue for you parasite welfare-queens who mooch off of society)? Is it just out of anger from the realization that everything you believed about guns is wrong?
 
Hater dupe claptrap. O-Care's now bringing much better mental health care. Actual progress- thanks to Dems OF COURSE.

Hey [MENTION=32338]francoHFW[/MENTION] - if Obamacare is "bringing much better mental health care" and creating "actual progress- thanks to Dems", why did this psycopath walk into a school armed with multiple weapons and intent on mass murder? :eusa_eh:

If what you said were even remotely true - this psycopath would have been a well-adjusted individual who walked into school armed with love intent on bringing mass joy. The fact is, a tragedy was averted because of guns - not because of Obamacare.

Watching your inner turmoil play out on USMB over what you were brainwashed to believe since birth vs. the reality you are finding harder and harder to deny is absolutely priceless. You're an unhinged lunatic that nobody takes seriously (one of your fellow Dumbocrats actually told me in a private message that all of them literally cringe every time you post because you make them look so stupid :lol:).
 
Hater dupe claptrap. O-Care's now bringing much better mental health care. Actual progress- thanks to Dems OF COURSE.

Umm, O-Care has not started yet.
O-Care starts on Jan. 1st, 2014.

Kind of illustrates just how desperate and stupid franco is - doesn't it? He has no idea what's actually going on in America. He just knows he's been conditioned to support all things Dumbocrat at all costs.
 
Why do you add things that are not true?
Gun owners do not do whatever they want. They follow the laws.

You know regardless what one thinks of gun laws, this OP is not at all an argument against them. It sure as hell isn't proof of anything. Come on, guys. Get real.

In the face of indisputable evidence (armed individual on site caused the incident to end after only 80 seconds and with the death of only ONE person - the homicidal maniac) you have no intelligent response and are sniveling with "come on, guys" like a child :lol:

"Come on, guys" - gee, what an intelligent response. Why can't you just be a big boy and admit what you can't even attempt to deny? eusa_doh:

I'm not really sure if you understand what indisputable evidence even is.
 
Yes, out of all mass shootings in the past, this one example of another person conveniently carrying a gun at the same time is justification for you gun nuts to do whatever you want.

You left out the dozens of examples where mass shootings started, and there was NO good guy with a gun there to do anything about it. And so the killings went on and on.

And do you know what? The killers planned it that way. There's a reason why the killers, no matter how insane, virtually never shoot up a police station or gun show or rifle range. They know the nationwide fear, horror, and huge body count they want, is a lot harder to achieve when there's someone who can shoot back.

Don't worry. Conservatives take ALL the shootings into account, not just the rare one where the shooter goofs and attacks a place where there's a good guy with a gun nearby.

And the results look very bad for the mewling liberals who want to disarm law-abiding people. Virtually every time.

Tell me: IN all the MANY instances where a nutcase attacks a place where some mewling liberal has made a rule disarming the law-abiding (schools, post offices, govt buildings, shopping centers with "gun-free zone" signs etc.)....

....has the mewling liberal EVER been held partially accountable for the dead and injured he prevented from defending themselves?

Has anyone ever pointed out that, while a dozen people were getting mowed down by some crazy, it is partly the mewling liberal's fault, that nobody in the school or shopping center or post office was able to resist?

Has anybody asked the mewling liberal why he set up a zone where the crazy could be very confident that he could go on killing and killing without interruption, and so enabled the crazy's spree of mass murder?

So you're saying it is safer to have a lot more people being able to carry guns in public. Many of these mass shooters acquired their weapons legally. Are we to believe that more people carrying guns means more harmony? Get real.
 
The article in the OP states the shooter took his own life. The sheriff at the school had nothing to do with stopping him.

What am I supposed to be seeing here?

And you think he took his own life before killing anyone because he felt God in his heart? Really? (Psst - he killed himself because an armed individual had arrived to stop him).

It's amazing how you guys play dumb when the facts leave you without an argument...

So your saying the guy who shot himself was scared to be shot by the security guy? Really?

Glad you claim victory when some poor girl was shot. You gun nuts are sick. Like all shootings there is no winner.
 

Forum List

Back
Top