On Truth Social trump demands to be reinstated...again

[monkrules]

So you don't think Biden is slimy?.... if you are that far gone I guess we have nothing else to discuss.... you have been lied to about Trump...

You obviously believe anyone who doesn't believe exactly as you do is wrong, and that they are, "that far gone."

It must be nice to believe you are always right, and everyone else is wrong. No wonder you worship trump.

There's nothing else for us to talk about.

Have a nice day.

 

[Lastamender]

But you claim it wasn't fairly covered by the MSM.

So who are the dissenters?

Are you claiming it was fairly covered. And the dissenters are the people who disagree with the fascists in power.

 

[Lastamender]

They did not investigate a damn thing. Do you know what the result of this was....The bipartisan commission voted along party lines to award all the contested ballots to Hayes—securing the presidency for him by a single electoral vote.

I do not care and it was an investigation. Liar.

 

[beagle9]

I wonder if Trump really want's a redo? After the past couple of years, if there actually WAS a redo election between Biden and Trump, I think Trump would lose again.

Figure the left completed the task without wrinkle eh ? So the thinking is that y'all finally got him this time, and he's just worn out eh ??

 

[beagle9]

Ill

Rabid speculation at this point

Trump asked if he should be reinstated or should there be a new election. In the next sentence, he made a declaration by saying that because of the (perceived by Trump supporters) fraud and the magnitude of it, that it was sufficient to allow the termination of all rules, even those contained in the Constitution. Nope, sorry, when it came to his comment about terminating the Constitution, that was a declaration, not a question.

You should read it again.

Probably meant to temporarily suspend some parts of it (remove it's chains in a special situation), in order to get to the bottom of how the left has actually revealed the constitution's weaknesses that it has since exploited, and to reveal how the left has circumvented it in order to get it's way in in the most challenging situation the constitution has ever had in it's short history or existence.

 

[Delldude]

And we had a free and fair election.

Have to consult the FBI and Intel community on that.

 

[beagle9]

Quit spinning, where did He say to terminate the COTUS?

They are interpreting that his stance suspends the constitution in order for him to work through their corruption.

They hate that, because they've circumvented the document in order to make it stand for something that it doesn't, and they've done so in a way that helps them to control us.

 

[beagle9]

Advocating destroying the Constitution is to make war on the Constitution and the rule of law.

On this forum, in this very thread, conservatives are desperately trying to defend Trump; not one rightist has denounced Trump’s calling for the Constitution to be destroyed.

The right’s war on the Constitution and the rule of law continues.

No one's calling for any founding document to be destroyed drama boy. That's on your side of the isle, and don't even talk about respecting the rule of law, because that's something you knuckleheads don't give a shite about unless you can retwist it to fit your bull crap.

 

[beagle9]

You keep saying you have proof of the fraud - yet you are always unable or unwilling to show us that "proof."

So how could any thinking person believe you?

You say he won't show it, but I 100% garantee that if he did show it to your leftist Ace, then you along with your gang of leftist minion's would deny it or swear that's it's not enough when it is in fact more than enough.

 

[beagle9]

You retard...

Evidentiary Hearings Determine If Criminal Cases Go to Trial | Shevin Law Group

Before a court in California authorizes a criminal case for trial, the prosecutor will prepare an evidentiary hearing. This hearing also goes by the name preliminary hearing.

www.shevinlaw.com

​

​

Before a court in California authorizes a criminal case for trial, the prosecutor will prepare an evidentiary hearing. This hearing also goes by the name preliminary hearing. A judge will evaluate the evidence presented by the prosecutor to determine if a crime occurred and if you appear to be responsible for it. The possibility exists that a judge will dismiss the case if the evidence seems too weak for the state to invest resources in a trial.​

Go to court with no evidence to support your claims, and the judge will dismiss the case due to lack of evidence or lack of merit.

Judges don't allow frivolous lawsuits to waste the court's time and expenses.

Yeah and he can also dismiss it if he's in the tank for the left, otherwise possibly compromised like the other's we might know...

 

[beagle9]

I thought about it.

You have still not shown a law which compelled Congress to hold a 10 day investigation.

You have still not shown where Congress can be sued because you don't like how they voted on a particular measure.

You have still not shown where the plaintiff has standing to sue on behalf of others.

You are still utterly clueless.

Nope you are clueless, because a preponderance of evidence is being gathered, and guess what ? A lot of that evidence has already proven to be a huge problem for the Democrat's that got into the whirlpool that is slowly dragging them down into hell.

 

[beagle9]

Trump and Biden are both worthless fucks.

Trump just happens to be disgusting, filthy, and treasonous on top of everything else.

America is in desperate need of better political candidates, from both parties.

Biden makes Trump look like a boy scout at a patriotic fund raiser when it comes to being an honorable patriotic American. Biden is a lying sack.

 

[beagle9]

Nope. The investigation was a witch hunt to find fraud that didn't exist. 384 voted to avoid that nonsense.

Aren't you glad they did ???

 

[beagle9]

There was no serious threat. Again, you're citing yourself as your source.

Every state counted and canvassed their elections. Some recounted. Some audited. ALL certified. Just like other elections. That's not a serious threat. That's just YOU claiming it's a serious threat.

Do you realize what time period we are living in ? Nothing is CORRECT or right anymore. So it's highly suspect that you are defending stuff that's so old, and by convenience of the document you are attempting to do so, but not in good faith are you doing so.

 

[Faun]

You say he won't show it, but I 100% garantee that if he did show it to your leftist Ace, then you along with your gang of leftist minion's would deny it or swear that's it's not enough when it is in fact more than enough.

It's been more than 2 years so far -- what's he waiting for?

 

[Faun]

Yeah and he can also dismiss it if he's in the tank for the left, otherwise possibly compromised like the other's we might know...

Why would Trump-appointed judges have been "in the tank" for Biden?

 

[Faun]

Nope you are clueless, because a preponderance of evidence is being gathered, and guess what ? A lot of that evidence has already proven to be a huge problem for the Democrat's that got into the whirlpool that is slowly dragging them down into hell.

What evidence?

 

[Faun]

Do you realize what time period we are living in ? Nothing is CORRECT or right anymore. So it's highly suspect that you are defending stuff that's so old, and by convenience of the document you are attempting to do so, but not in good faith are you doing so.

Then how come you can't post proof of what was illegal?

 

[Delldude]

Why would Trump-appointed judges have been "in the tank" for Biden?

Impartiality is how they do their jobs.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Impartiality is how they do their jobs.

Okay...................you said quite clearly that impartiality is how they do their jobs, so by your own admission, they CAN'T be in the tank for Biden.