Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 123,308
- 132,948
- 3,645
Indeed they were, per Judge Cannon.I thought they were illegal prosecutions.
One might suspect she invented a new rule to just to save her fat orange rapist Daddy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indeed they were, per Judge Cannon.I thought they were illegal prosecutions.
Definitely one of the dumbest MAGAt talking points.Funny. But, it was Hillary who was appointed in 2016 and Harris was appointed without even a primary in 2024.
Like I said, why then, did your boy need a coverall pardon if he was illegally prosecuted ?Indeed they were, per Judge Cannon.
One might suspect she invented a new rule to just to save her fat orange rapist Daddy.
Because the other judge rejected Cannon's new rule and mocked her.Like I said, why then, did your boy need a coverall pardon if he was illegally prosecuted ?
Cannon showed Weiss was a US attorney where Smith was an outsider....and not qualified.Because the other judge rejected Cannon's new rule and mocked her.
You don't read much, do ya?
LOL. So, you deny Kamala Harris was appointed to be the nominee without a primary process?Definitely one of the dumbest MAGAt talking points.
No, I didnt get your fantasy memo. Quick, Google for some more irrelevant things you don't understand.Cannon showed Weiss was a US attorney where Smith was an outsider....and not qualified.
Didn't get the memo?
. It's a stupid talking point that lands with nobody except for stupid people.LOL. So, you deny Kamala Harris was appointed to be the nominee without a primary process?
Why was Hunter's defense denied their motion for dismissal based on Cannon's ruling on Smith?No, I didnt get your fantasy memo. Quick, Google for some more irrelevant things you don't understand.
So, you deny Kamala Harris was appointed to be the nominee without a primary process?. It's a stupid talking point that lands with nobody except for stupid people.
Trump goes off on Josh Hawley over insider trading bill
President Trump on Wednesday went off on one his closest allies in Congress, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), for his vote on a bill that would ban stock trading by lawmakers, presidents and vice presidents, arguing Hawley teamed up with Democrats to advance the measure.
The bill would ban congressional lawmakers and their spouses from trading stocks, and would impose the same rules on presidents and vice presidents, though the latter would only apply to future administrations.
Still, Trump, in a social media post, went off on Hawley, claiming he was being used by Democrats to target him. He also questioned Hawley being the lone Republican on the panel to vote with Democrats 8-7 to advance the bill out of committee.