Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The OT is theology, myth, and legend. The legends may arise from historical events but they are still legends. If you require your scripture to be historically or scientifically accurate you are wildly missing the point.
So the belief that the universe began is scientifically incorrect?The OT is theology, myth, and legend. The legends may arise from historical events but they are still legends. If you require your scripture to be historically or scientifically accurate you are wildly missing the point.
If this world was created by God, why do believers try to tell God how he works when they can see how He works for themselves. If God created man by evolution and not by some supernatural method, who are they to tell him he did it wrong?
I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.So the belief that the universe began is scientifically incorrect?The OT is theology, myth, and legend. The legends may arise from historical events but they are still legends. If you require your scripture to be historically or scientifically accurate you are wildly missing the point.
If this world was created by God, why do believers try to tell God how he works when they can see how He works for themselves. If God created man by evolution and not by some supernatural method, who are they to tell him he did it wrong?
More than 6,000 years ago ancient man believed the universe began. And they passed this belief down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years before it was recorded in writing.I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.So the belief that the universe began is scientifically incorrect?The OT is theology, myth, and legend. The legends may arise from historical events but they are still legends. If you require your scripture to be historically or scientifically accurate you are wildly missing the point.
If this world was created by God, why do believers try to tell God how he works when they can see how He works for themselves. If God created man by evolution and not by some supernatural method, who are they to tell him he did it wrong?
Was the universe created or does is just change shape like an ocean wave, eternally flipping inside out? I don't know and I don't think you do either, and I'm sure those Bronze Age nomads didn't know. If the Bible said both God and the universe were eternal would you still believe it was created?More than 6,000 years ago ancient man believed the universe began. And they passed this belief down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years before it was recorded in writing.I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.
It has been my experience that when people include the word honestly in their sentences they usually aren't.
The question wasn't who created existence. The question is did the OT get the universe beginning correct. I say it did.
Created. Yes. I do know. The SLoT precludes an infinite acting universe without thermal equilibrium. You should ask yourself why that makes you so uncomfortable.Was the universe created or does is just change shape like an ocean wave, eternally flipping inside out? I don't know and I don't think you do either, and I'm sure those Bronze Age nomads didn't know. If the Bible said both God and the universe were eternal would you still believe it was created?More than 6,000 years ago ancient man believed the universe began. And they passed this belief down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years before it was recorded in writing.I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.
It has been my experience that when people include the word honestly in their sentences they usually aren't.
The question wasn't who created existence. The question is did the OT get the universe beginning correct. I say it did.
"...Our universe is made of four kinds of so-called elementary particles: neutrons, protons, electrons, and photons, which are particles of radiation. (I disregard neutrinos, since they do not interact with other matter; also the host of other particles that appear transiently in the course of high‑energy nuclear interactions.) The only important qualification one need make to such a simple statement is that the first three particles exist also as antiparticles, the particles constituting matter, the anti-particles anti-matter. When matter comes into contact with anti-matter they mutually annihilate each other, and their masses are instantly turned into radiation according to Einstein’s famous equation, E = mc2, in which E is the energy of the radiation, m is the annihilated mass, and c is the speed of light.Was the universe created or does is just change shape like an ocean wave, eternally flipping inside out? I don't know and I don't think you do either, and I'm sure those Bronze Age nomads didn't know. If the Bible said both God and the universe were eternal would you still believe it was created?More than 6,000 years ago ancient man believed the universe began. And they passed this belief down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years before it was recorded in writing.I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.
It has been my experience that when people include the word honestly in their sentences they usually aren't.
The question wasn't who created existence. The question is did the OT get the universe beginning correct. I say it did.
Additionally, if the universe were not created then what was responsible for the cosmic background radiation?Was the universe created or does is just change shape like an ocean wave, eternally flipping inside out? I don't know and I don't think you do either, and I'm sure those Bronze Age nomads didn't know. If the Bible said both God and the universe were eternal would you still believe it was created?More than 6,000 years ago ancient man believed the universe began. And they passed this belief down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years before it was recorded in writing.I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.
It has been my experience that when people include the word honestly in their sentences they usually aren't.
The question wasn't who created existence. The question is did the OT get the universe beginning correct. I say it did.
I don't use Google.
Sure there is evidence. God said he created the universe. In other words, the universe had a beginning. Science has since come to the same conclusion regarding the Big Bang.I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.So the belief that the universe began is scientifically incorrect?The OT is theology, myth, and legend. The legends may arise from historical events but they are still legends. If you require your scripture to be historically or scientifically accurate you are wildly missing the point.
If this world was created by God, why do believers try to tell God how he works when they can see how He works for themselves. If God created man by evolution and not by some supernatural method, who are they to tell him he did it wrong?
I don't know, I wasn't there, but I'll gladly admit you and your Bible have 50-50 chance of being correct.Additionally, if the universe were not created then what was responsible for the cosmic background radiation?Was the universe created or does is just change shape like an ocean wave, eternally flipping inside out? I don't know and I don't think you do either, and I'm sure those Bronze Age nomads didn't know. If the Bible said both God and the universe were eternal would you still believe it was created?More than 6,000 years ago ancient man believed the universe began. And they passed this belief down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years before it was recorded in writing.I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.
It has been my experience that when people include the word honestly in their sentences they usually aren't.
The question wasn't who created existence. The question is did the OT get the universe beginning correct. I say it did.
You see... the only way we can get that kind of radiation is when particles and anti-particles annihilate themselves like what happened when the universe was created from nothing.
OK, God called that coin toss correctly, maybe, but lots of what He said (e.g., the sequence and time period of creation) does not mesh with science. You cherry-pick one instance and ignore the others.Sure there is evidence. God said he created the universe. In other words, the universe had a beginning. Science has since come to the same conclusion regarding the Big Bang.I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.So the belief that the universe began is scientifically incorrect?The OT is theology, myth, and legend. The legends may arise from historical events but they are still legends. If you require your scripture to be historically or scientifically accurate you are wildly missing the point.
If this world was created by God, why do believers try to tell God how he works when they can see how He works for themselves. If God created man by evolution and not by some supernatural method, who are they to tell him he did it wrong?
Before this, which was not that long ago in the 1950's, scientists used to think that the universe was eternal.
You are some kind of scientifically enlightened male.I don't know, I wasn't there, but I'll gladly admit you and your Bible have 50-50 chance of being correct.Additionally, if the universe were not created then what was responsible for the cosmic background radiation?Was the universe created or does is just change shape like an ocean wave, eternally flipping inside out? I don't know and I don't think you do either, and I'm sure those Bronze Age nomads didn't know. If the Bible said both God and the universe were eternal would you still believe it was created?More than 6,000 years ago ancient man believed the universe began. And they passed this belief down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years before it was recorded in writing.I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.
It has been my experience that when people include the word honestly in their sentences they usually aren't.
The question wasn't who created existence. The question is did the OT get the universe beginning correct. I say it did.
You see... the only way we can get that kind of radiation is when particles and anti-particles annihilate themselves like what happened when the universe was created from nothing.
Coin toss, huh?OK, God called that coin toss correctly, maybe, but lots of what He said (e.g., the sequence and time period of creation) does not mesh with science. You cherry-pick one instance and ignore the others.Sure there is evidence. God said he created the universe. In other words, the universe had a beginning. Science has since come to the same conclusion regarding the Big Bang.I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.So the belief that the universe began is scientifically incorrect?The OT is theology, myth, and legend. The legends may arise from historical events but they are still legends. If you require your scripture to be historically or scientifically accurate you are wildly missing the point.
If this world was created by God, why do believers try to tell God how he works when they can see how He works for themselves. If God created man by evolution and not by some supernatural method, who are they to tell him he did it wrong?
Before this, which was not that long ago in the 1950's, scientists used to think that the universe was eternal.
Our universe obviously began at some point, what I don't know is what existed before that?Coin toss, huh?OK, God called that coin toss correctly, maybe, but lots of what He said (e.g., the sequence and time period of creation) does not mesh with science. You cherry-pick one instance and ignore the others.Sure there is evidence. God said he created the universe. In other words, the universe had a beginning. Science has since come to the same conclusion regarding the Big Bang.I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.So the belief that the universe began is scientifically incorrect?The OT is theology, myth, and legend. The legends may arise from historical events but they are still legends. If you require your scripture to be historically or scientifically accurate you are wildly missing the point.
If this world was created by God, why do believers try to tell God how he works when they can see how He works for themselves. If God created man by evolution and not by some supernatural method, who are they to tell him he did it wrong?
Before this, which was not that long ago in the 1950's, scientists used to think that the universe was eternal.
They also correctly predicted that what they saw was the result of a process over time and that man arose from that creation.
That's pretty good considering that 6,000 years later you still deny the universe began.
Mind existed before it.Our universe obviously began at some point, what I don't know is what existed before that?Coin toss, huh?OK, God called that coin toss correctly, maybe, but lots of what He said (e.g., the sequence and time period of creation) does not mesh with science. You cherry-pick one instance and ignore the others.Sure there is evidence. God said he created the universe. In other words, the universe had a beginning. Science has since come to the same conclusion regarding the Big Bang.I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.So the belief that the universe began is scientifically incorrect?The OT is theology, myth, and legend. The legends may arise from historical events but they are still legends. If you require your scripture to be historically or scientifically accurate you are wildly missing the point.
If this world was created by God, why do believers try to tell God how he works when they can see how He works for themselves. If God created man by evolution and not by some supernatural method, who are they to tell him he did it wrong?
Before this, which was not that long ago in the 1950's, scientists used to think that the universe was eternal.
They also correctly predicted that what they saw was the result of a process over time and that man arose from that creation.
That's pretty good considering that 6,000 years later you still deny the universe began.
They didn't correctly predict that man arose from creation, man wrote it. You don't seem to think the fact that they got just about everything wrong about the how of creation is important.
Concerning 1 - 8, which of those can be independently verified by science? To assess the reliability of the OT we'd need to have another source that agrees with the OT, wouldn't we? Let's see that superior intelligence at work.Mind existed before it.Our universe obviously began at some point, what I don't know is what existed before that?Coin toss, huh?OK, God called that coin toss correctly, maybe, but lots of what He said (e.g., the sequence and time period of creation) does not mesh with science. You cherry-pick one instance and ignore the others.Sure there is evidence. God said he created the universe. In other words, the universe had a beginning. Science has since come to the same conclusion regarding the Big Bang.I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.So the belief that the universe began is scientifically incorrect?The OT is theology, myth, and legend. The legends may arise from historical events but they are still legends. If you require your scripture to be historically or scientifically accurate you are wildly missing the point.
If this world was created by God, why do believers try to tell God how he works when they can see how He works for themselves. If God created man by evolution and not by some supernatural method, who are they to tell him he did it wrong?
Before this, which was not that long ago in the 1950's, scientists used to think that the universe was eternal.
They also correctly predicted that what they saw was the result of a process over time and that man arose from that creation.
That's pretty good considering that 6,000 years later you still deny the universe began.
They didn't correctly predict that man arose from creation, man wrote it. You don't seem to think the fact that they got just about everything wrong about the how of creation is important.
Man was made from dust.
According to you they got everything wrong but you read it like a six year old would. Among other things Genesis tells us...
1. God created existence
2. Everything he created is good
3. What he created was done in steps
4. Man is a product of that creation
5. Man is unlike any other creature in creation
6. Man is made in God’s image in that he is a being which knows and creates
7. Man was told to go forth and be fruitful
8. Man was told to do as the original creator; to create for 6 days and then rest
9. Man knows right from wrong
10. Rather than abandoning the concept of right and wrong when man does wrong, he rationalizes he didn’t do wrong
11. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success
12. Failed behaviors naturally lead to failure
13. Pass it down to the next generation
But you are not intelligent enough to understand it.
All of them?Concerning 1 - 8, which of those can be independently verified by science? To assess the reliability of the OT we'd need to have another source that agrees with the OT, wouldn't we? Let's see that superior intelligence at work.Mind existed before it.Our universe obviously began at some point, what I don't know is what existed before that?Coin toss, huh?OK, God called that coin toss correctly, maybe, but lots of what He said (e.g., the sequence and time period of creation) does not mesh with science. You cherry-pick one instance and ignore the others.Sure there is evidence. God said he created the universe. In other words, the universe had a beginning. Science has since come to the same conclusion regarding the Big Bang.I honestly don't know. If it did begin, I see no evidence the OT God created it.So the belief that the universe began is scientifically incorrect?The OT is theology, myth, and legend. The legends may arise from historical events but they are still legends. If you require your scripture to be historically or scientifically accurate you are wildly missing the point.
If this world was created by God, why do believers try to tell God how he works when they can see how He works for themselves. If God created man by evolution and not by some supernatural method, who are they to tell him he did it wrong?
Before this, which was not that long ago in the 1950's, scientists used to think that the universe was eternal.
They also correctly predicted that what they saw was the result of a process over time and that man arose from that creation.
That's pretty good considering that 6,000 years later you still deny the universe began.
They didn't correctly predict that man arose from creation, man wrote it. You don't seem to think the fact that they got just about everything wrong about the how of creation is important.
Man was made from dust.
According to you they got everything wrong but you read it like a six year old would. Among other things Genesis tells us...
1. God created existence
2. Everything he created is good
3. What he created was done in steps
4. Man is a product of that creation
5. Man is unlike any other creature in creation
6. Man is made in God’s image in that he is a being which knows and creates
7. Man was told to go forth and be fruitful
8. Man was told to do as the original creator; to create for 6 days and then rest
9. Man knows right from wrong
10. Rather than abandoning the concept of right and wrong when man does wrong, he rationalizes he didn’t do wrong
11. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success
12. Failed behaviors naturally lead to failure
13. Pass it down to the next generation
But you are not intelligent enough to understand it.