- Banned
- #101
The EC gives small states a HUGE advantage. It's essentially a tyranny of the minority, especially when you throw in the fact that states with 450,000 people have 2 Senators and states with 25 million have 2 Senators. Throw in a healthy hunk of gerrymandering and Republicans have one party rule while having millions fewer votersOnly in America can the candidate who wins fewer votes can get elected.This is not an amendment.
It is illegal legislation designed to steal EC votes and throw them to a candidate that did not win that state!
Calm down Skippy.
The constitution was written to be amended from time to time.
Doesn't that seem like a bad way to run a democratic republic?
How so? The EC gives smaller states a seat at the table. Popular vote would eliminate any input they have in our presidential election. Or think of it this way: New York city has over 8 million people. That's more people in one city than the nine less populated states in our country. How would it be fair that only one city has more power of a presidential election than nine states?
If the intent of our founders was a Democrat system, they would have created one. Instead, they created a representative Republic.
Oh really? How long have Republicans had this one-party rule?
Would you like me to show you how the lowest 12 populated states still have less electoral votes than the top populated state? So if 12 states have less electoral votes than one state, how is that having more power?
Oh, FFS; cry US a fucking river, already .........