Official Thread for Denial of GreenHouse Effect and Radiative Physics.


Wrong ... cosmic rays originate outside the solar system ... by definition ... even though the actual particles are indistinguishable from the crap the Sun spews out ... almost entirely bare nekked protons ...

I know .. photons are smarter than you ... they know where to go ...

California / profit on the burning shores ...
 
Wrong ... cosmic rays originate outside the solar system ... by definition ... even though the actual particles are indistinguishable from the crap the Sun spews out ... almost entirely bare nekked protons ...

I know .. photons are smarter than you ... they know where to go ...

California / profit on the burning shores ...
Sun!!! Go pull any news outlet, Sun!!!!
 
I didn’t say it wasn’t

What are you saying then? ... from you're post # 2214:

dude, if it emits the same energy as it absorbs and it absorbed the radiation from the surface, how does it make it warmer than it was?

BTW, the light from the flashlight is hotter than the wall.

Emission and absorption are two types of "work" ... and work takes time ... (100 watts is 100 joules per second, and after zero seconds we get zero joules) ... during this time, the energy exists as kinetic energy in the molecule, vibrations and electron momentum ... and that's temperature by definition ...

Yes ... shine a flashlight at the Sun and the Sun's temperature will increase ... theoretically ... we can't measure that small ... just like man's contribution to global warming ... too small to measure ...

Maxwell's equations aren't consensus ... they're rigid mathematical proof of what Michael Faraday demonstrated ... the field nature of force ... photons can and do travel from cooler objects towards hotter objects ... in exactly the same way as heavier object are attracted to lighter objects ...
 
Emission and absorption are two types of "work" ... and work takes time ... (100 watts is 100 joules per second, and after zero seconds we get zero joules) ... during this time, the energy exists as kinetic energy in the molecule, vibrations and electron momentum ... and that's temperature by definition ...
And over half of what is absorbed, goes out to space, so the entirety of the absorption is not re-emitted to the surface. In no way in hell can it make the surface warmer with less than half of the emissions.
 
And over half of what is absorbed, goes out to space, so the entirety of the absorption is not re-emitted to the surface. In no way in hell can it make the surface warmer with less than half of the emissions.

The entirety of the energy absorbed is radiated back out into space ... 110 terawatts in ... 110 terawatts out ...

Conservation of Energy ... now you're violating the 1st Law of Thermodynamics ... care to try for the trifecta? ...
 
The entirety of the energy absorbed is radiated back out into space ... 110 terawatts in ... 110 terawatts out ...

Conservation of Energy ... now you're violating the 1st Law of Thermodynamics ... care to try for the trifecta? ...
no I'm not, all molecules radiate in 360 degrees. It sounds like you are violator.
 
no I'm not, all molecules radiate in 360 degrees. It sounds like you are violator.

It's a surface layer of molecules ... or just atomic nuclei if the surface is in a plasma state-of-matter ... do you know what a blackbody surface is? ...

"entirety of the absorption is not re-emitted to the surface"

Yeah, just clueless aren't you ... come back when you've learned a little solid geometry ...
 
It's a surface layer of molecules ... or just atomic nuclei if the surface is in a plasma state-of-matter ... do you know what a blackbody surface is? ...

"entirety of the absorption is not re-emitted to the surface"

Yeah, just clueless aren't you ... come back when you've learned a little solid geometry ...

As CO2 soaks up this infrared energy, it vibrates and re-emits the infrared energy back in all directions. About half of that energy goes out into space, and about half of it returns to Earth as heat,
 

This is too astounding, even for the Global Warming Cult.
Marxism of the highest order, intended to make everyone destitute.

Cuba is the only country in the world designated as "sustainable."
Let's all live in hovels, eating nothing but rice and beans, eh?

Your future thanks to self-righteous, preening "environmentalists."






These 14 American cities plan to ban meat, dairy and private vehicles by 2030 – is yours on the list?
08/22/2023 // Ethan Huff // Views

Tags: 2030, absurd, Agenda 2030, Austin, C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, cars, chaos, Climate, climate alarmism, climate change, collpase, dairy, economic collapse, freedom, global warming, great texan, green, green tyranny, insanity, left cult, Liberty, Libtards, meat, Suppressed, Tyranny
Meat-Counter-Supermarket-Butcher.jpg

By the year 2030, the following 14 cities in the United States are planning to completely outlaw all meat and dairy consumption, as well as all private vehicle ownership and use, in order to conform to the "green" climate standards of the so-called C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group:
• Austin, Texas
• Boston, Massachusetts
• Chicago, Illinois
• Houston, Texas
• Los Angeles, California
• Miami, Florida
• New Orleans, Louisiana
• New York City, New York
• Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
• Phoenix, Arizona
• Portland, Oregon
• San Francisco, California
• Washington, D.C.
• Seattle, Washington
All 14 of these cities are part of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, which has an "ambitious target" of achieving "0 kg [of] meat consumption," "0 kg [of] dairy consumption," only "3 new clothing items per person per year," "0 private vehicles" owned, and only "1 short-haul return flight (less than 1500 km) every 3 years per person."
This is all outlined in "The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5°C World" report, which was originally published in 2019 and "reemphasized" in 2023, the year of what appears to be a major financial collapse and possible transition into a new world order.
(Related: A lot of meat is becoming unsafe to consume anyway due to cattle being injected with mRNA "vaccines.")

While you starve to death in poverty, billionaires like Michael Bloomberg will be living high on the hog as usual​

Democrat billionaire Michael Bloomberg, who ran for president with almost zero support, is the primary funder of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. In addition to the aforementioned 14 U.S. cities that are involved, at least 86 other cities around the world are also on the list for no more meat and dairy, very few clothing purchases allowed, no more private vehicle ownership, and almost no more flying on airplanes come 2030.
Bloomberg, of course, will continue to gorge on expensive meals filled with fancy meat, as well as unlimited private plane ownership and use. The peons underneath him, though, will be reduced to mere cattle in his envisioned new world order.
If the C40 Cities goals are new to you, it is probably because very few media outlets are reporting on it. In fact, there is an aggressive "fact checking" war being waged on all news about C40 Cities and what the plan entails that aims to "debunk" it is a "conspiracy theory."
The AFP Fact Check service went after conservative commentator Glenn Beck for this very thing recently, claiming that his mention of the C40 Cities plan to ban meat, dairy, cars, and clothing consumption are "not policy recommendations."
"This report does not advocate for the wholesale adoption of these more ambitious targets in C40 cities; rather, they are included to provide a set of reference points that cities, and other actors, can reflect on when considering different emission-reduction alternatives and long-term urban visions," the AFP Fact Check claims.

The C40 Cities report's use of the term "target," though, implies that this is a "desired goal" of the initiative, which means that eventually it will be codified into policy and law and forced on the masses as the final solution to climate change.
"IF these were not their goals, they would not have labeled them 'ambitious targets,'" writes Evita Duffy-Alfonso for The Federalist.

"Right now, hedge funds and private billionaires are buying up residential homes and farmland all over the world. At the same time, unrealistic zero-emissions policies are impoverishing Westerners and annihilating the middle class, which is fueling reliance on centralized government."
If you live in one of the above cities and plan to be around in 2030, then perhaps you may wish to consider moving somewhere freer?
The "green" life is one marked by tyranny, poverty, forced veganism, and utter misery. Learn more at GreenTyranny.news.
 

This is too astounding, even for the Global Warming Cult.
Marxism of the highest order, intended to make everyone destitute.

Cuba is the only country in the world designated as "sustainable."
Let's all live in hovels, eating nothing but rice and beans, eh?

Your future thanks to self-righteous, preening "environmentalists."







These 14 American cities plan to ban meat, dairy and private vehicles by 2030 – is yours on the list?
08/22/2023 // Ethan Huff // Views

Tags: 2030, absurd, Agenda 2030, Austin, C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, cars, chaos, Climate, climate alarmism, climate change, collpase, dairy, economic collapse, freedom, global warming, great texan, green, green tyranny, insanity, left cult, Liberty, Libtards, meat, Suppressed, Tyranny
Meat-Counter-Supermarket-Butcher.jpg

By the year 2030, the following 14 cities in the United States are planning to completely outlaw all meat and dairy consumption, as well as all private vehicle ownership and use, in order to conform to the "green" climate standards of the so-called C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group:
• Austin, Texas
• Boston, Massachusetts
• Chicago, Illinois
• Houston, Texas
• Los Angeles, California
• Miami, Florida
• New Orleans, Louisiana
• New York City, New York
• Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
• Phoenix, Arizona
• Portland, Oregon
• San Francisco, California
• Washington, D.C.
• Seattle, Washington
All 14 of these cities are part of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, which has an "ambitious target" of achieving "0 kg [of] meat consumption," "0 kg [of] dairy consumption," only "3 new clothing items per person per year," "0 private vehicles" owned, and only "1 short-haul return flight (less than 1500 km) every 3 years per person."
This is all outlined in "The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5°C World" report, which was originally published in 2019 and "reemphasized" in 2023, the year of what appears to be a major financial collapse and possible transition into a new world order.
(Related: A lot of meat is becoming unsafe to consume anyway due to cattle being injected with mRNA "vaccines.")

While you starve to death in poverty, billionaires like Michael Bloomberg will be living high on the hog as usual​

Democrat billionaire Michael Bloomberg, who ran for president with almost zero support, is the primary funder of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. In addition to the aforementioned 14 U.S. cities that are involved, at least 86 other cities around the world are also on the list for no more meat and dairy, very few clothing purchases allowed, no more private vehicle ownership, and almost no more flying on airplanes come 2030.
Bloomberg, of course, will continue to gorge on expensive meals filled with fancy meat, as well as unlimited private plane ownership and use. The peons underneath him, though, will be reduced to mere cattle in his envisioned new world order.
If the C40 Cities goals are new to you, it is probably because very few media outlets are reporting on it. In fact, there is an aggressive "fact checking" war being waged on all news about C40 Cities and what the plan entails that aims to "debunk" it is a "conspiracy theory."
The AFP Fact Check service went after conservative commentator Glenn Beck for this very thing recently, claiming that his mention of the C40 Cities plan to ban meat, dairy, cars, and clothing consumption are "not policy recommendations."
"This report does not advocate for the wholesale adoption of these more ambitious targets in C40 cities; rather, they are included to provide a set of reference points that cities, and other actors, can reflect on when considering different emission-reduction alternatives and long-term urban visions," the AFP Fact Check claims.

The C40 Cities report's use of the term "target," though, implies that this is a "desired goal" of the initiative, which means that eventually it will be codified into policy and law and forced on the masses as the final solution to climate change.
"IF these were not their goals, they would not have labeled them 'ambitious targets,'" writes Evita Duffy-Alfonso for The Federalist.

"Right now, hedge funds and private billionaires are buying up residential homes and farmland all over the world. At the same time, unrealistic zero-emissions policies are impoverishing Westerners and annihilating the middle class, which is fueling reliance on centralized government."
If you live in one of the above cities and plan to be around in 2030, then perhaps you may wish to consider moving somewhere freer?
The "green" life is one marked by tyranny, poverty, forced veganism, and utter misery. Learn more at GreenTyranny.news.
All demofks should go the
 
This is too astounding, even for the Global Warming Cult.
Marxism of the highest order, intended to make everyone destitute.

Cuba is the only country in the world designated as "sustainable."
Let's all live in hovels, eating nothing but rice and beans, eh?

Your future thanks to self-righteous, preening "environmentalists."







These 14 American cities plan to ban meat, dairy and private vehicles by 2030 – is yours on the list?
08/22/2023 // Ethan Huff // Views

Tags: 2030, absurd, Agenda 2030, Austin, C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, cars, chaos, Climate, climate alarmism, climate change, collpase, dairy, economic collapse, freedom, global warming, great texan, green, green tyranny, insanity, left cult, Liberty, Libtards, meat, Suppressed, Tyranny
Meat-Counter-Supermarket-Butcher.jpg

By the year 2030, the following 14 cities in the United States are planning to completely outlaw all meat and dairy consumption, as well as all private vehicle ownership and use, in order to conform to the "green" climate standards of the so-called C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group:
• Austin, Texas
• Boston, Massachusetts
• Chicago, Illinois
• Houston, Texas
• Los Angeles, California
• Miami, Florida
• New Orleans, Louisiana
• New York City, New York
• Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
• Phoenix, Arizona
• Portland, Oregon
• San Francisco, California
• Washington, D.C.
• Seattle, Washington
All 14 of these cities are part of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, which has an "ambitious target" of achieving "0 kg [of] meat consumption," "0 kg [of] dairy consumption," only "3 new clothing items per person per year," "0 private vehicles" owned, and only "1 short-haul return flight (less than 1500 km) every 3 years per person."
This is all outlined in "The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5°C World" report, which was originally published in 2019 and "reemphasized" in 2023, the year of what appears to be a major financial collapse and possible transition into a new world order.
(Related: A lot of meat is becoming unsafe to consume anyway due to cattle being injected with mRNA "vaccines.")

While you starve to death in poverty, billionaires like Michael Bloomberg will be living high on the hog as usual​

Democrat billionaire Michael Bloomberg, who ran for president with almost zero support, is the primary funder of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. In addition to the aforementioned 14 U.S. cities that are involved, at least 86 other cities around the world are also on the list for no more meat and dairy, very few clothing purchases allowed, no more private vehicle ownership, and almost no more flying on airplanes come 2030.
Bloomberg, of course, will continue to gorge on expensive meals filled with fancy meat, as well as unlimited private plane ownership and use. The peons underneath him, though, will be reduced to mere cattle in his envisioned new world order.
If the C40 Cities goals are new to you, it is probably because very few media outlets are reporting on it. In fact, there is an aggressive "fact checking" war being waged on all news about C40 Cities and what the plan entails that aims to "debunk" it is a "conspiracy theory."
The AFP Fact Check service went after conservative commentator Glenn Beck for this very thing recently, claiming that his mention of the C40 Cities plan to ban meat, dairy, cars, and clothing consumption are "not policy recommendations."
"This report does not advocate for the wholesale adoption of these more ambitious targets in C40 cities; rather, they are included to provide a set of reference points that cities, and other actors, can reflect on when considering different emission-reduction alternatives and long-term urban visions," the AFP Fact Check claims.

The C40 Cities report's use of the term "target," though, implies that this is a "desired goal" of the initiative, which means that eventually it will be codified into policy and law and forced on the masses as the final solution to climate change.
"IF these were not their goals, they would not have labeled them 'ambitious targets,'" writes Evita Duffy-Alfonso for The Federalist.

"Right now, hedge funds and private billionaires are buying up residential homes and farmland all over the world. At the same time, unrealistic zero-emissions policies are impoverishing Westerners and annihilating the middle class, which is fueling reliance on centralized government."
If you live in one of the above cities and plan to be around in 2030, then perhaps you may wish to consider moving somewhere freer?
The "green" life is one marked by tyranny, poverty, forced veganism, and utter misery. Learn more at GreenTyranny.news.


It offends me that you call yourself an engineer when you lack sufficient intellect to discern how idiotic is this bullshit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top