Official Coronavirus Thread - Up to the minute Coronavirus map and count.

Definitely. You're seeing things that aren't there again.

What are your death numbers now?

I check here.


I mean your projected numbers based on your model. If you go by Dr. Fauci, then he had 100K to 200K as his latest numbers. Before that, he was saying something like 1.7 M deaths.

I don't know. I have not looked at them.

If you look at Dr. Fauci's numbers, then he had 1.7 M deaths early on. The latest is 100,00 - 200,000. Even that might be too high.

I estimated 15,000 - 20,000 deaths by Easter based on the number of deaths last week. Fauci had to estimate the entire number of deaths, so had a more difficult job but he had his model.

Now, his 100K - 200K could be overstated, too.

'(CNN)An influential model tracking the coronavirus pandemic in the United States now predicts that fewer people will die and fewer hospital beds will be needed compared to its estimates from last week.

As of Monday, the model predicted the virus will kill 81,766 people in the United States over the next four months, with just under 141,000 hospital beds being needed. That's about 12,000 fewer deaths -- and 121,000 fewer hospital beds -- than the model estimated on Thursday.

A "massive infusion of new data" led to the adjustments, according to the model's maker, Dr. Christopher Murray, who serves as director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington School of Medicine.'


It's no wonder people don't believe this COVID-19 to be as serious since we do not know about total confirmed numbers because of faulty testing. It could be higher if the second wave theory is correct.

Maybe Sweden isn't as wacky as other countries thought they were. I dunno.

The 1.7 million was probably assuming that nothing was done.
yeah, no. that's merely convenient. it was wrong, and it compromised our country. no excuse for that. none.

It was a worst-case scenario. Maybe you should have read that part.
and no other scenario was presented. that was the point.

That's not true. Have your specialist read this link to you.

I thought you just posted that was worst case scenario. see, you are confused.
 
100k to 240k deaths IF WE ALL OBEY OUR MASTERS. That number is BEST CASE SCENARIO

They were wildly wrong. We all know it.

first minute:



"They said 100k to 240k by Monday and that would be BEST CASE even if we do everything the tards demand."

Didn't say by Monday.

Didn't say best-case scenario.
 
The overreaction is unraveling as predicted numbers continue to plunge.
There is No Doubt, documented via recent written statements right here, that original projection of the itotal infected and total dead has plummeted from 1.7-2.2 million deceased to 60-80,000. That means that what got us shut down and what is keeping us shut down has an accuracy score of 3-4% on a scale of 100
Folks this has been a huge mistake and overreaction. If the government won’t deal with truth and reality than the citizens must. Heck the main doctor said last night that practically Anyone who is dying now gets it attributed to Corona. Get drunk and run your car into a tree but became infected with Corona 3 days earlier then it’s a Corona death and Still the numbers are Way Low. There were some charts 3 days ago that showed number of Corona only deaths and it was like 5% with 95% preexisting condition combo; those charts have been scrubbed.
This suspension of reality that we have been laboring under for 4 years must end now.
 
Last edited:
Definitely. You're seeing things that aren't there again.

What are your death numbers now?

I check here.


I mean your projected numbers based on your model. If you go by Dr. Fauci, then he had 100K to 200K as his latest numbers. Before that, he was saying something like 1.7 M deaths.

I don't know. I have not looked at them.

If you look at Dr. Fauci's numbers, then he had 1.7 M deaths early on. The latest is 100,00 - 200,000. Even that might be too high.

I estimated 15,000 - 20,000 deaths by Easter based on the number of deaths last week. Fauci had to estimate the entire number of deaths, so had a more difficult job but he had his model.

Now, his 100K - 200K could be overstated, too.

'(CNN)An influential model tracking the coronavirus pandemic in the United States now predicts that fewer people will die and fewer hospital beds will be needed compared to its estimates from last week.

As of Monday, the model predicted the virus will kill 81,766 people in the United States over the next four months, with just under 141,000 hospital beds being needed. That's about 12,000 fewer deaths -- and 121,000 fewer hospital beds -- than the model estimated on Thursday.

A "massive infusion of new data" led to the adjustments, according to the model's maker, Dr. Christopher Murray, who serves as director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington School of Medicine.'


It's no wonder people don't believe this COVID-19 to be as serious since we do not know about total confirmed numbers because of faulty testing. It could be higher if the second wave theory is correct.

Maybe Sweden isn't as wacky as other countries thought they were. I dunno.

The 1.7 million was probably assuming that nothing was done.
yeah, no. that's merely convenient. it was wrong, and it compromised our country. no excuse for that. none.

It was a worst-case scenario. Maybe you should have read that part.
and no other scenario was presented. that was the point.

That's not true. Have your specialist read this link to you.

I thought you just posted that was worst case scenario. see, you are confused.

There are multiple scenarios listed in that link. Have your specialist read it to you.
 
100k to 240k deaths IF WE ALL OBEY OUR MASTERS. That number is BEST CASE SCENARIO

They were wildly wrong. We all know it.

first minute:



"They said 100k to 240k by Monday and that would be BEST CASE even if we do everything the tards demand."

Didn't say by Monday.

Didn't say best-case scenario.

In other videos I posted they said "A WEEK." That was last monday.

I'm not gonna keep going round and round with you as you conveniently "forget" your doom and gloom prophecies from one day to the next.
 
100k to 240k deaths IF WE ALL OBEY OUR MASTERS. That number is BEST CASE SCENARIO

They were wildly wrong. We all know it.

first minute:



"They said 100k to 240k by Monday and that would be BEST CASE even if we do everything the tards demand."

Didn't say by Monday.

Didn't say best-case scenario.

In other videos I posted they said "A WEEK" That was last monday.

I'm not gonna keep going round and round with you as you conveniently "forget" everything you promise from one day to the next.


If you don't have a link to post, then just say that.

The one you posted doesn't support your statement.
 
100k to 240k deaths IF WE ALL OBEY OUR MASTERS. That number is BEST CASE SCENARIO

They were wildly wrong. We all know it.

first minute:



"They said 100k to 240k by Monday and that would be BEST CASE even if we do everything the tards demand."

Didn't say by Monday.

Didn't say best-case scenario.

.48 - 1.00. It's only 12 seconds
Please learn to listen
 
there was never a reason to shut the country down. there were no numbers,

There were those millions of deaths numbers. All we had to go by were the Chinese in China locking people in their own homes and stuff. I dislike getting the newer flus because the symptoms comes in waves. We had serious symptoms with this one. If you feel like an elephant is sitting on your lungs or your lungs are filled with glass when you breathe and have to sit down and rest just trying to breathe, then you know it's a serious virus.
I will agree they used those million death figures. No doubt in my mind. but that shooting from the hip philosophy is known as bad. We have historical data that could have been used. they could have weighed out different scenarios. they could have monitored the data and made adjustments in hot spots if they prevailed. To simply shut down an economy on absolutely no data is irresponsible and it's deadly.
For couple weeks as you and I repeatedly asked for stats, the only number they could put out was deaths. That right there showed they did not want a background for comparative stats.
 
100k to 240k deaths IF WE ALL OBEY OUR MASTERS. That number is BEST CASE SCENARIO

They were wildly wrong. We all know it.

first minute:



"They said 100k to 240k by Monday and that would be BEST CASE even if we do everything the tards demand."

Didn't say by Monday.

Didn't say best-case scenario.

In other videos I posted they said "A WEEK" That was last monday.

I'm not gonna keep going round and round with you as you conveniently "forget" everything you promise from one day to the next.


If you don't have a link to post, then just say that.

The one you posted doesn't support your statement.


Try to keep up

 
100k to 240k deaths IF WE ALL OBEY OUR MASTERS. That number is BEST CASE SCENARIO

They were wildly wrong. We all know it.

first minute:



"They said 100k to 240k by Monday and that would be BEST CASE even if we do everything the tards demand."

Didn't say by Monday.

Didn't say best-case scenario.

.48 - 1.00. It's only 12 seconds
Please learn to listen


I did. He doesn't say "Monday" and he doesn't say "best case".
 
100k to 240k deaths IF WE ALL OBEY OUR MASTERS. That number is BEST CASE SCENARIO

They were wildly wrong. We all know it.

first minute:



"They said 100k to 240k by Monday and that would be BEST CASE even if we do everything the tards demand."

Didn't say by Monday.

Didn't say best-case scenario.

In other videos I posted they said "A WEEK" That was last monday.

I'm not gonna keep going round and round with you as you conveniently "forget" everything you promise from one day to the next.


If you don't have a link to post, then just say that.

The one you posted doesn't support your statement.


Try to keep up



Doesn't say by Monday. And I don't even know who that organization is.
 
Definitely. You're seeing things that aren't there again.

What are your death numbers now?

I check here.


I mean your projected numbers based on your model. If you go by Dr. Fauci, then he had 100K to 200K as his latest numbers. Before that, he was saying something like 1.7 M deaths.

I don't know. I have not looked at them.

If you look at Dr. Fauci's numbers, then he had 1.7 M deaths early on. The latest is 100,00 - 200,000. Even that might be too high.

I estimated 15,000 - 20,000 deaths by Easter based on the number of deaths last week. Fauci had to estimate the entire number of deaths, so had a more difficult job but he had his model.

Now, his 100K - 200K could be overstated, too.

'(CNN)An influential model tracking the coronavirus pandemic in the United States now predicts that fewer people will die and fewer hospital beds will be needed compared to its estimates from last week.

As of Monday, the model predicted the virus will kill 81,766 people in the United States over the next four months, with just under 141,000 hospital beds being needed. That's about 12,000 fewer deaths -- and 121,000 fewer hospital beds -- than the model estimated on Thursday.

A "massive infusion of new data" led to the adjustments, according to the model's maker, Dr. Christopher Murray, who serves as director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington School of Medicine.'


It's no wonder people don't believe this COVID-19 to be as serious since we do not know about total confirmed numbers because of faulty testing. It could be higher if the second wave theory is correct.

Maybe Sweden isn't as wacky as other countries thought they were. I dunno.

The 1.7 million was probably assuming that nothing was done.
yeah, no. that's merely convenient. it was wrong, and it compromised our country. no excuse for that. none.

It was a worst-case scenario. Maybe you should have read that part.
and no other scenario was presented. that was the point.

That's not true. Have your specialist read this link to you.

so again, worst case scenario.
 
Definitely. You're seeing things that aren't there again.

What are your death numbers now?

I check here.


I mean your projected numbers based on your model. If you go by Dr. Fauci, then he had 100K to 200K as his latest numbers. Before that, he was saying something like 1.7 M deaths.

I don't know. I have not looked at them.

If you look at Dr. Fauci's numbers, then he had 1.7 M deaths early on. The latest is 100,00 - 200,000. Even that might be too high.

I estimated 15,000 - 20,000 deaths by Easter based on the number of deaths last week. Fauci had to estimate the entire number of deaths, so had a more difficult job but he had his model.

Now, his 100K - 200K could be overstated, too.

'(CNN)An influential model tracking the coronavirus pandemic in the United States now predicts that fewer people will die and fewer hospital beds will be needed compared to its estimates from last week.

As of Monday, the model predicted the virus will kill 81,766 people in the United States over the next four months, with just under 141,000 hospital beds being needed. That's about 12,000 fewer deaths -- and 121,000 fewer hospital beds -- than the model estimated on Thursday.

A "massive infusion of new data" led to the adjustments, according to the model's maker, Dr. Christopher Murray, who serves as director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington School of Medicine.'


It's no wonder people don't believe this COVID-19 to be as serious since we do not know about total confirmed numbers because of faulty testing. It could be higher if the second wave theory is correct.

Maybe Sweden isn't as wacky as other countries thought they were. I dunno.

The 1.7 million was probably assuming that nothing was done.
yeah, no. that's merely convenient. it was wrong, and it compromised our country. no excuse for that. none.

It was a worst-case scenario. Maybe you should have read that part.
and no other scenario was presented. that was the point.

That's not true. Have your specialist read this link to you.

so again, worst case scenario.

Multiple scenarios are presented in that link. I'm not going to read it to you.
 
All the Enders of Mankind are backtracking now and saying they never said or were misunderstood and all that bullshit
If we consider that 3 weeks ago we were still 100% circulating amongst ourselves then the two week period for Corona to show up has come and gone. But, in the 13yh/14th day someone infected someone so that’s another 14 days max And we’ve been 95% non associating for over two weeks, almost three. After that the chances for more reinfection has dwindled returned to negligible
So it makes sense that weeks 2.5 to 4 should have the highest death numbers with decreasing new infection numbers.
 
Definitely. You're seeing things that aren't there again.

What are your death numbers now?

I check here.


I mean your projected numbers based on your model. If you go by Dr. Fauci, then he had 100K to 200K as his latest numbers. Before that, he was saying something like 1.7 M deaths.

I don't know. I have not looked at them.

If you look at Dr. Fauci's numbers, then he had 1.7 M deaths early on. The latest is 100,00 - 200,000. Even that might be too high.

I estimated 15,000 - 20,000 deaths by Easter based on the number of deaths last week. Fauci had to estimate the entire number of deaths, so had a more difficult job but he had his model.

Now, his 100K - 200K could be overstated, too.

'(CNN)An influential model tracking the coronavirus pandemic in the United States now predicts that fewer people will die and fewer hospital beds will be needed compared to its estimates from last week.

As of Monday, the model predicted the virus will kill 81,766 people in the United States over the next four months, with just under 141,000 hospital beds being needed. That's about 12,000 fewer deaths -- and 121,000 fewer hospital beds -- than the model estimated on Thursday.

A "massive infusion of new data" led to the adjustments, according to the model's maker, Dr. Christopher Murray, who serves as director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington School of Medicine.'


It's no wonder people don't believe this COVID-19 to be as serious since we do not know about total confirmed numbers because of faulty testing. It could be higher if the second wave theory is correct.

Maybe Sweden isn't as wacky as other countries thought they were. I dunno.

The 1.7 million was probably assuming that nothing was done.
yeah, no. that's merely convenient. it was wrong, and it compromised our country. no excuse for that. none.

It was a worst-case scenario. Maybe you should have read that part.
and no other scenario was presented. that was the point.

That's not true. Have your specialist read this link to you.

so again, worst case scenario.

Multiple scenarios are presented in that link. I'm not going to read it to you.
Good, don't. That troll is simply trying to waste your time and get attention.
 
100k to 240k deaths IF WE ALL OBEY OUR MASTERS. That number is BEST CASE SCENARIO

They were wildly wrong. We all know it.

first minute:



"They said 100k to 240k by Monday and that would be BEST CASE even if we do everything the tards demand."

Didn't say by Monday.

Didn't say best-case scenario.

.48 - 1.00. It's only 12 seconds
Please learn to listen


I did. He doesn't say "Monday" and he doesn't say "best case".

No. this video doesnt say "Monday." I said Monday because in other videos THAY SAID "The next week or two are gonna be hell for America". They then warned 100k to 240k deaths.

Damn you tards are such f-ing weasels!
 
100k to 240k deaths IF WE ALL OBEY OUR MASTERS. That number is BEST CASE SCENARIO

They were wildly wrong. We all know it.

first minute:



"They said 100k to 240k by Monday and that would be BEST CASE even if we do everything the tards demand."

Didn't say by Monday.

Didn't say best-case scenario.

In other videos I posted they said "A WEEK." That was last monday.

I'm not gonna keep going round and round with you as you conveniently "forget" your doom and gloom prophecies from one day to the next.

It's what he seems to like. go around in circles. worst case best case same number. isn't that special?
 
100k to 240k deaths IF WE ALL OBEY OUR MASTERS. That number is BEST CASE SCENARIO

They were wildly wrong. We all know it.

first minute:



"They said 100k to 240k by Monday and that would be BEST CASE even if we do everything the tards demand."

Didn't say by Monday.

Didn't say best-case scenario.

.48 - 1.00. It's only 12 seconds
Please learn to listen


I did. He doesn't say "Monday" and he doesn't say "best case".

No. this video doesnt say "Monday." I said Monday because in other videos THAY SAID "The next week or two are gonna be hell for America". They then warned 100k to 240k deaths.

Damn you tards are such f-ing weasels!

don't lose your cool with these fkwads, they'll think they're winning.
 

Forum List

Back
Top