Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Actually…two things should be addressed: religious rights and security needs. This looks like a win win resolution, right?Good. That’s what they should be addressing. Not just the hijab.
Removing a turban of a Sikh or a yarmulka of a Jewish person is obviously improper (unless there’s good reason to believe that the turban is likely concealing a gun).Actually…two things should be addressed: religious rights and security needs. This looks like a win win resolution, right?
True…but it can still come up against religious rights and a hijab that does not cover the face itself is a reasonable religious compromise. The same compromise is made with driver’s license photos.Removing a turban of a Sikh or a yarmulka of a Jewish person is obviously improper (unless there’s good reason to believe that the turban is likely concealing a gun).
But as for mug shots: there is only one major need for the police. That is to display the full face of the subject for possible future reference.
If you need the final word, go for it.True…but it can still come up against religious rights and a hijab that does not cover the face itself is a reasonable religious compromise. The same compromise is made with driver’s license photos.
I do believe we agree and that is exactly what your article stated.If you need the final word, go for it.
In the meanwhile, I reiterate that the police don’t need to remove any head covering for a mug shot unless (and to the extent that) the head covering conceals any part of the face of the subject.