Now Missouri

Didn't you say he could just not open the the certified votes of a state and send it back to the states. Neither the Constitution nor the statute gives him that authority.
Actually the amended version makes it absolutely clear, the VP has to open up certificates, even if they are obviously phony. He has to present them to congress, and congress decides what to do with them.

In fact it now says:
(2)Powers explicitly denied.—
The President of the Senate shall have no power to solely determine, accept, reject, or otherwise adjudicate or resolve disputes over the proper certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors, the validity of electors, or the votes of electors.
 
What you left out

(2)Action on certificate.—
(A)In general.—
Upon the reading of each certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any.

Meaning, any judgement on the validity of the certificates is done by congress, not by the VP.
Again, nothing I stated at all. I said the VP had the power to stop it, by not convening the session or opening of the envelopes. He could state there is a challenge and send them back. Nothing is absolute!!! fools.
 
Actually the amended version makes it absolutely clear, the VP has to open up certificates, even if they are obviously phony. He has to present them to congress, and congress decides what to do with them.
post it.
 
It's clear you haven't read the constitution. Or at least not in its entirety (BTW it's not that long)


You will find no use of "innocent", "guilty", or "presumed", (or different length versions) anywhere in the Constitution. Posted for your perusal.

M'kay, lying racist vermin. And yes, presumed innocent is in fact in the Constitution. Pretend you're looking for it to defend Biden, and suddenly you'll see it, MAGAt
 
He doesn't have to gavel the session into order, which would mean he wouldn't be opening the material.
That's an exceptional reach you have there. He would be replaced as master of ceremony, I mean President of the Senate.
 
This is getting ridiculous.

Let the people decide. SCOTUS needs to address this

Missouri official threatens to remove Biden from 2024 presidential ballot if 'new legal standard' boots Trump

It’s time for a Republican states to remove Joe Biden from the ballot because of his failure to insure our border laws are enforced.

Unfortunately, I doubt if the Republicans have the cojones to do it. Republicans are wimpy, wimpy, wimpy. Conservatives want to elect people who will fight for them. Trump is not really a true wimpy Republican but he is a fighter. That’s why so many conservatives like him.

 
2. No one was charged with or convicted of insurrection, period. So that point is moot.
That is not a requirement. For instance, Confederate members were not charged or convicted with insurrection but could not hold US office.
 
That is not a requirement. For instance, Confederate members were not charged or convicted with insurrection but could not hold US office.
Nope. Amnesty Act in 1872 shut that down. Stop with disinformation
 
It’s time for a Republican states to remove Joe Biden from the ballot because of his failure to insure our border laws are enforced.

Unfortunately, I doubt if the Republicans have the cojones to do it. Republicans are wimpy, wimpy, wimpy. Conservatives want to elect people who will fight for them. Trump is not really a true wimpy Republican but he is a fighter. That’s why so many conservatives like him.

What laws? Asylum laws? What has Congress done to change those laws?
 
Nope, I sent you the link for an actual representation. Shall only means is owed, meaning, it needs to happen, doesn’t mean it can’t be delayed
In legislation “shall” means MUST
 
What laws? Asylum laws? What has Congress done to change those laws?
Dems are trying to keep Trump off the ballot because they claim he started an insurrection. He has never been charged with doing that or convinced. He should be considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law in our nation.

The media and the Democratic Party can’t just claim someone is guilty and have that be the accepted verdict. This is not a nation with rules like the old USSR.

Biden, as President, was supposed to insure our immigration laws are enforced. He has failed.
 
Dems are trying to keep Trump off the ballot because they claim he started an insurrection. He has never been charged with doing that or convinced. He should be considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law in our nation.

The media and the Democratic Party can’t just claim someone is guilty and have that be the accepted verdict. This is not a nation with rules like the old USSR.

Biden, as President, was supposed to insure our immigration laws are enforced. He has failed.
So you'd like to see the Jan 6th case in DC expedited and concluded before we go to the polls? Because he was arrested and is charged with attempting to overturn the free and fair 2020 election with fraudulent and forged documents. His VP has said that he was demanding that as President of the Senate, he should toss out the votes of several states and substitute the forged ones.
 

Forum List

Back
Top