Now Missouri

[jc456]

Good for you

Still wrong

Nope link says otherwise

 

[Lesh]

Nope link says otherwise

If it’s the link I quoted it does NOT. It says the opposite

 

[jc456]

If it’s the link I quoted it does NOT. It says the opposite

Nope. Quote me the part that says shall = must

 

[Lesh]

Nope. Quote me the part that says shall = must

My phone will only quote links. I did that and it doesn’t say what you claim

 

[jc456]

My phone will only quote links. I did that and it doesn’t say what you claim

Sorry it doesn’t

 

[Magnus]

 

[kyzr]

A court ruling is not 'anyone'.

If the court was a jury the result was 4-3.

The USSC needs to make the call, otherwise we're talking thru our hats.

 

[kyzr]

That is not a requirement. For instance, Confederate members were not charged or convicted with insurrection but could not hold US office.

An act of congress may be the requirement. We'll see soon.

 

[Batcat]

So you'd like to see the Jan 6th case in DC expedited and concluded before we go to the polls? Because he was arrested and is charged with attempting to overturn the free and fair 2020 election with fraudulent and forged documents. His VP has said that he was demanding that as President of the Senate, he should toss out the votes of several states and substitute the forged ones.

Trump’s defense is far from weak and I would like to see any case against him play out in the regular way most cases do. The wheels of justice turn slowly but grind exceedingly small. The Jan 6th case against Trump is hardly a slam dunk for the prosecution.

Trump grouses that his indictments took years. Here’s why that is.​

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/10/31/trump-grouses-that-his-indictments-took-years-heres-why-that-is/

Why Jack Smith didn't charge Trump with inciting an insurrection

We've curated insights from experts on why an insurrection charge was absent from the third indictment against Trump.

news.yahoo.com

 

[Batcat]

What judge has so ruled?

Why should it be a judge?

Tit for tat? Ron DeSantis floats striking Joe Biden from Florida ballot

The Governor suggests that the President's border policy could be a cause for action.

floridapolitics.com

snip


Friday was the first time DeSantis specifically said Florida could strike Biden, though he mentioned the concept more abstractly during a Thursday interview on Fox.

“The idea that one bureaucrat in an executive position can simply unilaterally disqualify someone from office, that turns on its head every notion of constitutional due process that this country has always abided by for over 200 years,” he said on “The Ingraham Angle.”

“It opens up Pandora’s box. Can you have a Republican Secretary of State disqualify Biden from the ballot because he’s let in 8 million people illegally in a massive invasion, including from enemies of our country? Places like Iran, China and the Middle East have poured in with his knowledge and assent basically. So it really opens up Pandora’s box.”

 

[postman]

Again, nothing I stated at all. I said the VP had the power to stop it,by not convening the session or opening of the envelopes. He could state there is a challenge and send them back. Nothing is absolute!!! fools.

The law say:

(1)In general.—The President of the Senate shall—
(A)open the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the votes of electors appointed pursuant to a certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors issued pursuant to section 5, in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the letter A; and

When a law says "shall" there is no wiggle room.

And if the VP tried to stall or halt the count. 2/3rds of the senators could on motion of failure to perform his duty, expel the VP from the Senate, and the President of the Senate position would then go to the president-pro-temper of the senate. And the count would continue.

 

[the other mike]

This is getting ridiculous.

Let the people decide. SCOTUS needs to address this

Missouri official threatens to remove Biden from 2024 presidential ballot if 'new legal standard' boots Trump

Missouri official threatens to remove Biden from 2024 presidential ballot if 'new legal standard' boots Trump

Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft says he'll remove President Biden from the presidential ballot if Trump is disqualified to appear in other states.

www.foxnews.com

Removing Biden won't do anything.
He won't be running and most people know it.

 

[the other mike]

The only way Biden will still be president a year from now is if the election is cancelled by a cyber attack or something.

 

[postman]

Removing Biden won't do anything.
He won't be running and most people know it.

Did any illegals enter while Trump was president?
We all know the answer is YES.
Which means if they want to remove Biden for letting illegals into the country, they could do the same for Trump.
They both failed to secure the border.

 

[jc456]

The law say:

(1)In general.—The President of the Senate shall—
(A)open the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the votes of electors appointed pursuant to a certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors issued pursuant to section 5, in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the letter A; and

When a law says "shall" there is no wiggle room.

And if the VP tried to stall or halt the count. 2/3rds of the senators could on motion of failure to perform his duty, expel the VP from the Senate, and the President of the Senate position would then go to the president-pro-temper of the senate. And the count would continue.

The biggest word in your post here is.......(1)In general. Hilarious. Oh and shall is not must.

 

[postman]

The biggest word in your post here is.......(1)In general. Hilarious. Oh and shall is not must.

That goes toward if the VP fails to do his duty, the senate could expel him and the president pro-temper of the senate would take over the count.

In General.

 

[jc456]

Did any illegals enter while Trump was president?
We all know the answer is YES.
Which means if they want to remove Biden for letting illegals into the country, they could do the same for Trump.
They both failed to secure the border.

yep, and as a measure to curtail the entry, he worked out with the Mexican President to hold any asylum seekers in Mexico while the courts readied to discuss their fate. Built some wall where access would be curtailed.

 

[jc456]

That goes toward if the VP fails to do his duty, the senate could expel him and the president pro-temper of the senate would take over the count.

In General.

keep trying, maybe you'll get there.

 

[postman]

yep, and as a measure to curtail the entry, he worked out with the Mexican President to hold any asylum seekers in Mexico while the courts readied to discuss their fate. Built some wall where access would be curtailed.

Bottom line, both failed to secure the border.
Remove one for that reason, and you have to remove both.

touche'

 

[mamooth]

You people are hypocrites with double standards who would be losing it if it were happening to your boy the pedophile who can't stand up on his own you're voting for, magot

Every conservative accusation is a confession. That rule holds with 100% accuracy.

Thus, this post is terrifying.