Now Jack Smith demands gag order on trump too!!

[Faun]

You’re thinking disabled.

No. Because he was a President, a candidate pending candidate for a second term and posed no threat to the agents.

You understand that part of the warrant was related to anyone who threatened law enforcement with imminent danger, right, Liability?

 

[Marener]

Wrong. The use of force was authorized for the execution of the warrant. It had nothing to do with posting threats.

Are you sure? Did you actually read the document?

In short, you disagree with no ability to explain why.

Your usual worthless posting style

Ill try to explain it again slower for you. The search warrant stated the standard FBI police for use of force that could be used only if someone posed in imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury on the agent or another person. There is no way this could be construed as anything like an assassination plot.

 

[Faun]

Wrong. The use of force was authorized for the execution of the warrant. It had nothing to do with posting threats.

You're completely deranged.

 

[Clipper]

It just keeps getting crazier. We found out a few days ago that the FBI was authorized to shoot trump at the Mar-a-Lago raid and now the govt says trump can't talk about that!!

Jack Smith Seeks Order Barring Trump From Criticizing Law Enforcement Over Deadly Force Authorization for Mar-a-Lago Raid | The Gateway Pundit | by Kristinn Taylor

Special Counsel Jack Smith filed a motion Friday night demanding President Trump's condition of release in the classified documents case be modified to include barring him from criticizing law enforcement for authorizing deadly force in the August 8, 2022 raid on Trump's Mar-a-Lago home in Palm...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

How was the FBI going to whack gangster Trump when they were at MAL & he was in N.Y? Space laser?

We should be so lucky.

 

[BackAgain]

Are you sure? Did you actually read the document?

Ill try to explain it again slower for you. The search warrant stated the standard FBI police for use of force that could be used only if someone posed in imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury on the agent or another person. There is no way this could be construed as anything like an assassination plot.

Yes. Unlike you, I understood it.

Read those words as slowly as you need to.

We all know you’re slow.

 

[Clipper]

A government that has to silence people instead of explaining their actions is illegitimate.

Trump needs a gag a maggot order before he gets someone killed with his big mouth.

 

[Marener]

Yes. Unlike you, I understood it.

Read those words as slowly as you need to.

We all know you’re slow.

You claimed it had nothing to do with threats, but that's specifically when deadly force is authorized by the document. Here's the language. Since Trump was no threat, the policy is not and could not be any danger to him.

 

[BackAgain]

You claimed it had nothing to do with threats, but that's specifically when deadly force is authorized by the document. Here's the language. Since Trump was no threat, the policy is not and could not be any danger to him.

View attachment 951991

No no, you flipper and flopper.

The lingo (boilerplate) in the search warrant authorizing the use of any force at all was bullshit from jump street.

They weren’t afraid of threats.

There was zero threat posed by President Trump. The point remains that there was no basis in the real world of any kind to justify the use of deadly force lingo.

Spin all you want. But it’s clear that you’re full of the contents of Potato’s depends.

 

[Marener]

No no, you flipper and flopper.

The lingo (boilerplate) in the search warrant authorizing the use of any force at all was bullshit from jump street.

They weren’t afraid of threats.

There was zero threat posed by President Trump. The point remains that there was no basis in the real world of any kind to justify the use of deadly force lingo.

Spin all you want. But it’s clear that you’re full of the contents of Potato’s depends.

It's not an "authorization". It's a statement about when deadly force can be used, per standard policy of the FBI.

Since there's zero threat posed by President Trump then the policy of no threat to him.

 

[forkup]

No no, you flipper and flopper.

The lingo (boilerplate) in the search warrant authorizing the use of any force at all was bullshit from jump street.

They weren’t afraid of threats.

There was zero threat posed by President Trump. The point remains that there was no basis in the real world of any kind to justify the use of deadly force lingo.

Spin all you want. But it’s clear that you’re full of the contents of Potato’s depends.

How do you determine when someone, or some group is a threat? What is it about running for high office that eliminates the danger to federal agents, not just from him but everybody associated with him? Tiger Joe was running for president. What's his threat level?

If you recognize the language of the ROE of the search warrant is "boiler plate" what warrants the deviation?

 

[BackAgain]

It's not an "authorization". It's a statement about when deadly force can be used, per standard policy of the FBI.

Since there's zero threat posed by President Trump then the policy of no threat to him.

Wrong. But I’m growing bored word your constant lies.

You’re a very bad troll.

 

[Blaster]

It's not an "authorization". It's a statement about when deadly force can be used, per standard policy of the FBI.

Since there's zero threat posed by President Trump then the policy of no threat to him.

Quit stealing my avi.

 

[Marener]

Wrong

Great argument. You're really demonstrating your quick wit and insight.

 

[BackAgain]

Great argument. You're really demonstrating your quick wit and insight.

All that’s needed.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Liberals want to murder President Trump. It's the only way they can get rid of him. They tried everything else and nothing worked.

 

[konradv]

All the time? Give us some examples.

That other Don’s trial. You know, Teflon, as opposed to Diaper.

 

[Faun]

No no, you flipper and flopper.

The lingo (boilerplate) in the search warrant authorizing the use of any force at all was bullshit from jump street.

They weren’t afraid of threats.

There was zero threat posed by President Trump. The point remains that there was no basis in the real world of any kind to justify the use of deadly force lingo.

Spin all you want. But it’s clear that you’re full of the contents of Potato’s depends.

You're seriously demented, Liability.

The document clearly states, “Law enforcement officers of the Department of Justice may use deadly force only when necessary, that is, when the officer has a reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to another person.”

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Trump needs a gag a maggot order before he gets someone killed with his big mouth.

LoL

 

[konradv]

Criminals lose some of their rights

Well, they do!

 

[StatesRightsForever]

You've lost your mind. Show us where you got the 60 million number.

They're illegals!!! No one knows how many of them there are. But the "official" number of 11 million is an obvious lie because the gover-media has used that same number for 40 years!!

My opinion is there are 60 million of these criminal invaders. One is too many.