Now Jack Smith demands gag order on trump too!!

[Missouri_Mike]

Donald Trump vows to lock up political enemies if he ...​

View attachment 951886
The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com › us-news › aug › trump-...
Aug 31, 2023 — Former president tells Glenn Beck he would have 'no choice' but to lock up opponents 'because they're doing it to us'

So you don’t want democrats to live under the same rules they created?

 

[john doe 101]

I think the DNC would like to kill both trump AND BIDEN, since joey is such a weak candidate.

I would highly encourage trump to continue eating fried chicken, big macs, and large soda's.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

There are not 60,000,000 illegals in the US. Get some psychological help, traitor.

Oh yes there are. It's something like 60 million. And they all lead lives of crime and welfare and are destroying america. All part of the democrat plan.

 

[john doe 101]

Oh yes there are. It's something like 60 million. And they all lead lives of crime and welfare and are destroying america. All part of the democrat plan.

You've lost your mind. Show us where you got the 60 million number. You can't because it doesnt exist except in your mind. And lol at them ALL being criminals. You live in a fantasy world. Either A. You really dont believe this dumb shit but just say it in an attempt to get stupid people to side with your losing cause or B. You really do believe it and you need mental help.

 

[Smokin' OP]

So you don’t want democrats to live under the same rules they created?

Link?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Oh yes there are. It's something like 60 million. And they all lead lives of crime and welfare and are destroying america. All part of the democrat plan.

Such an idiotic statement ^^^ that.

There are maybe 15 million illegals. Fact.

They commit less crime person than citizens. Fact.

I bet three MAGAts commit three times the amount of crime compared to one illegal.

 

[Foxfyre]

It just keeps getting crazier. We found out a few days ago that the FBI was authorized to shoot trump at the Mar-a-Lago raid and now the govt says trump can't talk about that!!

Jack Smith Seeks Order Barring Trump From Criticizing Law Enforcement Over Deadly Force Authorization for Mar-a-Lago Raid | The Gateway Pundit | by Kristinn Taylor

Special Counsel Jack Smith filed a motion Friday night demanding President Trump’s condition of release in the classified documents case be modified to include barring him from criticizing law enforcement for authorizing deadly force in the August 8, 2022 raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in Palm...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Given the behavior of a weaponized DOJ/government who has pull out all the stops to get Trump off the campaign trail and have used the most dishonest and unethical means to do that, and given how unequal the treatment is of those on the right compared to how those on the left are treated. . .

. . .he was perfectly within his rights to point out the FBI had authority to shoot him had he challenged them in the Mar-a-lago raid and he isn't being unreasonable that they very well might have done that or that was the plan. Certainly he is within his constitutional rights to say what he thinks of dishonorable actions by the U.S. government.

"From the earliest days of our Nation, criticizing government officials without retribution has been a hallmark of the freedoms our Founders determined as essential to our democracy." . . .

Supreme Court: Our Right to Criticize and Petition the Government Remains Fundamental - Marks Gray

From the earliest days of our Nation, criticizing government officials without retribution has been a hallmark of the freedoms our Founders determined as essential to our democracy. At the same time, those who serve in public office deserve respect and must be able to conduct the public’s...

marksgray.com

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump has the right to his opinion, to which statements there are consequences.

 

[BackAgain]

I don’t believe there is a single legitimate legal basis to gag Trump from discussing the news about the “use of deadly force” provision of the absurd search warrant.

In any event, Jerk Smith can’t censor the rest of us.

 

[Marener]

I don’t believe there is a single legitimate legal basis to gag Trump from discussing the news about the “use of deadly force” provision of the absurd search warrant.

It wasn’t so much news as it was an outright lie.

 

[BackAgain]

It wasn’t so much news as it was an outright lie.

Actually, as usual, you just lied.

Now, if you wanted to be honest (as if that would ever happen) you could say that the lingo authorizing the possible use of deadly force is boilerplate. I would actually agree with that. I think it is.

But it should have been very clearly removed in this instance where the warrant involved a former President and a probable future candidate.

 

[BluesLegend]

Oh look, yet another imbecile who doesn't understand there are restrictions to the First Amendment's freedom of speech clause.

Come here dummy, we are not talking about those restrictions now are we. ^^^ Dem clown alert!

 

[Lastamender]

Criminals lose some of their rights.

Smith has lost his rights? Let's hope so.

 

[Marener]

But it should have been very clearly removed in this instance where the warrant involved a former President and a probable future candidate.

Why? Because he’s a snowflake?

 

[BackAgain]

Why? Because he’s a snowflake?

You’re thinking disabled.

No. Because he was a President, a candidate pending candidate for a second term and posed no threat to the agents.

 

[Marener]

You’re thinking disabled.

No. Because he was a President, a candidate pending candidate for a second term and posed no threat to the agents.

Then the statement of the policy is irrelevant since they can only use force against those who post threats.

Doesn’t explain why it should be taken out and why Trump and his brainless cadre called it an assassination plot.

 

[BackAgain]

Then the statement of the policy is irrelevant since they can only use force against those who post threats.

Wrong. The use of force was authorized for the execution of the warrant. It had nothing to do with posting threats.

Doesn’t explain why it should be taken out and why Trump and his brainless cadre called it an assassination plot.

In short, you disagree with no ability to explain why.

Your usual worthless posting style

 

[Faun]

If it's SOP why did the FBI explicitly state it's ok to shoot trump and his associates.?

Damn, you don't even lie good.

 

[Faun]

Oh yes there are. It's something like 60 million. And they all lead lives of crime and welfare and are destroying america. All part of the democrat plan.

Well there were about 10 million here when Trump became president and about 7 million have arrived under Biden. That means 43 million came here while Trump was president.

 

[Faun]

Come here dummy, we are not talking about those restrictions now are we. ^^^ Dem clown alert!

We are talking about 1A restrictions. They exist. They include court ordered, SCOTUS affirmed, gag orders. Too bad if you don't like that, fuck your feelings.