Not finding evidence is now a reason to get fired?

[Concerned American]

Eric Seibert, the acting U.S. Attorney for the state of Virginia and a "Republican", was fired because he failed to find evidence that incriminates AG for New York, Letitia James.



It seems that now, the requirement to be at Trump's side is to fulfill his wishes and find evidence (though there may be none and are innocent) of those that he considers enemies.

Are we now losing our Justice system, to be replaced with a king that decides all of our fates, depending on whether we support him or not?

Is proof of guilt not important now?

Maybe he should have kept Biden's NY contingency--they convicted a ham sandwich.

 

[Luckyone]

No, thats not correct either. The right lies too.

So then, if that is the norm, what do you suggest be done, given that BOTH parties are doing it, and there are no other choices available

 

[Concerned American]

Prove that that were kangaroo courts,

Wait for the SCOTUS case. You'll get all the proof you want, missy.

 

[Luckyone]

So you believe trump then? Interesting.

When the truth makes him look like a big strong man, yes

 

[Rawley]

Explain that statement in detail as to how what she supplied is not an answer to what she was accused if

An opinion by her lawyers to the press is not evidence

 

[Marener]

Comey was.

LOL

God you’re useless.

 

[Rawley]

God you’re useless.

Backatcha

 

[Luckyone]

An opinion by her lawyers to the press is not evidence

Show me what you mean in detail

 

[Rawley]

Show me what you mean in detail

Post #27

 

[Luckyone]

Post #27

Post #27 proves MY point. You do know that “intent to deceive” is the most important thing to prove in a fraud case, don’t you?

You want the government to spend tax dollars to take James to court when there is only a 1%chance to win?

That is plain stupid and simply vengeful

 

[ThisIsMe]

When the truth makes him look like a big strong man, yes

And you decide when hes telling the truth?

 

[Luckyone]

And you decide when hes telling the truth?

common sense does that

 

[ThisIsMe]

common sense does that

So, your common sense can tell whether or not he resigned or if trump fired him first? I mean, if your common sense makes you privy to private conversations, I applaud you my good sir!

 

[Luckyone]

So, your common sense can tell whether or not he resigned or if trump fired him first? I mean, if your common sense makes you privy to private conversations, I applaud you my good sir!

What then is YOUR take on all of the FACT that Seibert resigned but Trump stated the he FIRED him. Tell me!

 

[ThisIsMe]

What then is YOUR take on all of the FACT that Seibert resigned but Trump stated the he FIRED him. Tell me!

Im just going off the words of the guy himself who apparently said he resigned, then later trump said he fired him.

Its a he said she said.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Eric Seibert, the acting U.S. Attorney for the state of Virginia and a "Republican", was fired because he failed to find evidence that incriminates AG for New York, Letitia James.



It seems that now, the requirement to be at Trump's side is to fulfill his wishes and find evidence (though there may be none and are innocent) of those that he considers enemies.

Are we now losing our Justice system, to be replaced with a king that decides all of our fates, depending on whether we support him or not?

Is proof of guilt not important now?

He was fired because he wouldn't bring a case when there was ample evidence of a crime. Sorry, Lucky but the days when Democrats could break the law and have compliant DA's not bring charges against them are over. James will have her day in court to prove that she isn't guilty of the very crime that she attempted to break Donald Trump with.

 

[Rawley]

Post #27 proves MY point.

Your "point" was that they presented new "evidence" As your post 27 laid out, very clearly, they didn't present any new evidence. Her attorney gave the press his opinion on the existing evidence.

 

[Luckyone]

He was fired because he wouldn't bring a case when there was ample evidence of a crime. Sorry, Lucky but the days when Democrats could break the law and have compliant DA's not bring charges against them are over. James will have her day in court to prove that she isn't guilty of the very crime that she attempted to break Donald Trump with.

Again, to have a case to take to court, an Attorney General needs to have without-a-shadow-of-a-doubt evidence. This is especially true in a fraud case because "intent to defraud" has to be proven.

As I showed in post #27, there is plenty of evidence showing that there is huge doubt about the "intent to defraud".

If you know ANYTHING about the law, as Attorney General/Prosecutor, you should not (cannot) take a case to court when the chances of winning are "slim to none" as it would be an un-supported act of useless spending of tax-payer dollars.

Then again, I totally understand you. Revenge, hate, bias, and a desire to win (no matter what the odds are) rules your thinking, meaning that common sense is nowhere to be found in your brain.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Again, to have a case to take to court, an Attorney General needs to have without-a-shadow-of-a-doubt evidence. This is especially true in a fraud case because "intent to defraud" has to be proven.

As I showed in post #27, there is plenty of evidence showing that there is huge doubt about the "intent to defraud".

If you know ANYTHING about the law, as Attorney General/Prosecutor, you should not (cannot) take a case to court when the chances of winning are "slim to none" as it would be an un-supported act of useless spending of tax-payer dollars.

Then again, I totally understand you. Revenge, hate, bias, and a desire to win (no matter what the odds are) rules your thinking, meaning that common sense is nowhere to be found in your brain.

You're kidding, right Lucky?
Letitia James charged Trump with "fraud" even though there was no victim!
At the same time she was committing fraud multiple times. ACTUAL FRAUD! Not made up crap but REAL fraud! She lied on her mortgage applications repeatedly to get better rates and she KNEW exactly what she was doing!

 

[Luckyone]

You're kidding, right Lucky?
Letitia James charged Trump with "fraud" even though there was no victim!
At the same time she was committing fraud multiple times. ACTUAL FRAUD! Not made up crap but REAL fraud! She lied on her mortgage applications repeatedly to get better rates and she KNEW exactly what she was doing!

Your post is full of blah, blah, blah accusations but you have offered no links to data and facts that prove your words.

In addition, you say that James fraudulently charged Trump with fraud? She won her case!

Attorney General James Wins Landmark Victory in Case ...​

Trump did win his appeals case but only as far as what he had to pay. The Fraud itself was upheld!

The appeals court decision

• Date of ruling: On August 21, 2025, a five-judge panel in New York's mid-level appeals court issued a split decision on Trump's appeal.
• Monetary penalty voided: The court threw out the massive financial penalty, with a majority calling it "excessive" and a violation of the Eighth Amendment.
• Fraud finding upheld: The panel largely upheld the underlying finding that Trump and his company had committed fraud.