Not finding evidence is now a reason to get fired?

She’s definitely not an experienced prosecutor and I don’t think anyone sees her as unbiased. I mean, it’s pretty clear that getting the nomination to the position is contingent on her willingness to take the case no matter what.

Of course, you don’t seem to have a problem with this, but it’s pretty sad this is what Trump is doing to this country.
I should just go with your expertise on this matter, huh?
oh brother. :rolleyes-41:
Have a good day.
 
I should just go with your expertise on this matter, huh?
oh brother. :rolleyes-41:
Have a good day.
Garbagesayinghesright1.webp
 
You think?
LOL, Did you forget your partisan lawfare of the past four years? Prosecutors who ran on "get Trump"? Liberal outlets bragging that "a good prosecutor could indict a ham sandwich"? Please keep up and don't whine when democrat tactics are turned on them.
 
I should just go with your expertise on this matter, huh?
oh brother. :rolleyes-41:
Have a good day.

It’s just common sense.

Do you guys have an excuse prepared if he doesn’t get convicted?
 
LOL, Did you forget your partisan lawfare of the past four years? Prosecutors who ran on "get Trump"? Liberal outlets bragging that "a good prosecutor could indict a ham sandwich"? Please keep up and don't whine when democrat tactics are turned on them.
Good prosecutors get convictions at court.

The indictment of Comey doesn't seem to really care about convictions.
 
It’s just common sense.

Do you guys have an excuse prepared if he doesn’t get convicted?
Darling, all I have wanted is it go through the courts, as it should.
I'll go along with any verdict. You are not capable of doing that.
You're blinded by your bias.
 
Good prosecutors get convictions at court.

The indictment of Comey doesn't seem to really care about convictions.
Getting a conviction is not what this is about. For Trump supporters, if Trump says they are guilty, it is a done deal!
 
Darling, all I have wanted is it go through the courts, as it should.
I'll go along with any verdict. You are not capable of doing that.
You're blinded by your bias.

You guys whine about verdicts all the time.

Why do you want it to go through the courts?
 
LOL, seems you want to short circuit the process and keep it out of court. I say let the courts decide.

If the case has no real chance at securing a conviction, why should the courts decide? It’s a waste of time and resources.
 
15th post
So prosecutors should charge anything they can get past a grand jury?

I don’t know about that. That seems pretty ******* stupid.
Educate yourself on why prosecutors take cases to grand juries in the first place. You're ignorant.
 
Anyone who engages in lawfare should be fired OP, are you for lawlessness?
 
Hundreds of thousands of people have been fired from their jobs, in spite of the fact that they were highly respected for doing their jobs well. Explain that!
No longer needed, replaced by a machine, supported Kirks murder, state raised min wage,
 
Back
Top Bottom