Not finding evidence is now a reason to get fired?

[Meister]

BS, Seiberr did NOT find enough reasons to take it to court!

Really? Could there be an underlying reason why he didn't?

Could have, but you don't know, nor do I, so it should be settled
in a court of law.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Eric Seibert, the acting U.S. Attorney for the state of Virginia and a "Republican", was fired because he failed to find evidence that incriminates AG for New York, Letitia James.



It seems that now, the requirement to be at Trump's side is to fulfill his wishes and find evidence (though there may be none and are innocent) of those that he considers enemies.

Are we now losing our Justice system, to be replaced with a king that decides all of our fates, depending on whether we support him or not?

Is proof of guilt not important now?

He says he resigned. Who you going to believe, him, or trump?

 

[Luckyone]

He says he resigned. Who you going to believe, him, or trump?

He resigned by pressure from Trump, but Trump said that he actually fired him.

Officially he resigned but reality is that he was fired.

 

[Luckyone]

Lol, they were trying to come up with all types of lies on trump when O and biden were in. Please.

Hold on a second, 5 times Trump has been found GUILTY in a court of law for something he did do and several more cases that were up for trial have been postponed because he won the election, this means that A LOT of things said about him have been true.

How many times was Obama or Biden taken to court and they lost?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Hold on a second, 5 times Trump has been found GUILTY in a court of law for something he did do and several more cases that were up for trial have been postponed because he won the election, this means that A LOT of things said about him have been true.

How many times was Obama or Biden taken to court and they lost?

No, not playing that game. All of these prosecutors and juries were all radical leftists.

 

[Meister]

Hold on a second, 5 times Trump has been found GUILTY in a court of law for something he did do and several more cases that were up for trial have been postponed because he won the election, this means that A LOT of things said about him have been true.

How many times was Obama or Biden taken to court and they lost?

(Kangaroo Court)

 

[Luckyone]

No, not playing that game. All of these prosecutors and juries were all radical leftists.

I see now. The left lies but the Right doesn't, correct?

In addition, there is no corruption or criminals on the Right, they are all on the left, Right?

I guess this was all more of the same during the previous 28 years, correct?

 

[Luckyone]

(Kangaroo Court)

Oh yeah, the left has Kangaroo Courts but the Right are all real ones, correct?

Is that why Trump got rid of Barr and now he placed Bondi in that role?

AI Overview

To understand the differences between Pam Bondi and William Barr regarding their experience and qualifications for the role of U.S. Attorney General, a review of their career histories is necessary. Both served as Attorney General, but they brought different legal backgrounds and career paths to the position.

Pam Bondi

Confirmed: February 2025

• Legal Experience: Served as a prosecutor in the Florida State Attorney's Office for 18 years, where she handled a wide range of cases, from domestic violence to homicide.
• Government Experience: Served two terms as the Attorney General of Florida (2011–2019), becoming the first woman to hold that office.
• Notable Florida Actions: Fought opioid abuse and human trafficking, and defended Florida's ban on same-sex marriage (prior to the Supreme Court ruling).
• Private and Post-AG Work: After leaving the Florida AG post, she worked as a lobbyist for firms like Ballard Partners, representing corporate and foreign interests. She also served on Donald Trump's legal defense team during his first impeachment trial in 2020.
• Relationship with Trump: Has a long and very close relationship with Donald Trump, openly supporting his claims of voter fraud in 2020 and acting as a vocal defender. Her loyalty to Trump has been a significant point of discussion and criticism.

William Barr

Confirmed: Twice, serving under President George H.W. Bush (1991–1993) and President Donald Trump (2019–2020).

• Legal Experience: Had an extensive career in government and corporate law. He served in the CIA, worked in the Reagan White House, and held senior positions at the Department of Justice, including Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel and Deputy Attorney General. Barr has never been a prosecutor in a courtroom setting.
• Corporate Experience: Spent 14 years working as general counsel and executive vice president for the telecommunications companies GTE and Verizon.
• Notable Actions as AG: As AG under George H.W. Bush, he oversaw the response to the Pan Am 103 bombing. In his second term under Trump, he received extensive criticism for his handling of the Mueller report and for intervening in cases involving Trump's associates.
• Relationship with Trump: Initially seen as a loyalist, Barr ultimately clashed with Trump. He resigned after contradicting Trump's claims of widespread fraud in the 2020 election, stating the Justice Department found no evidence to support them.

 

[struth]

Eric Seibert, the acting U.S. Attorney for the state of Virginia and a "Republican", was fired because he failed to find evidence that incriminates AG for New York, Letitia James.



It seems that now, the requirement to be at Trump's side is to fulfill his wishes and find evidence (though there may be none and are innocent) of those that he considers enemies.

Are we now losing our Justice system, to be replaced with a king that decides all of our fates, depending on whether we support him or not?

Is proof of guilt not important now?

1) he wasn’t the acting US attorney for state of VA, but the acting US attorney for the eastern district of the commonwealth of VA
2) yes he resigned, and his replacement was able to find evidence and present the case to a grand jury who said there was without question evidence of a crime

 

[ThisIsMe]

He resigned by pressure from Trump, but Trump said that he actually fired him.

Officially he resigned but reality is that he was fired.

So you believe trump then? Interesting.

 

[whitehall]

The weaponized Biden DOJ didn't stop at firing disloyal employees, old Joe and his auto-signed minions indicted them ln frivolous charges and ruined their lives.

 

[konradv]

His peers gave him up....
He was dragging his feet ...
That's his right

He should have said openly....I don't want this case.

We will hear more about this

Why wouldn’t his “peers” appear with the new prosecutor? That says what they really think about her and the case.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

View attachment 1167751

I see now. The left lies but the Right doesn't, correct?

In addition, there is no corruption or criminals on the Right, they are all on the left, Right?

I guess this was all more of the same during the previous 28 years, correct?

View attachment 1167755


View attachment 1167760

No, thats not correct either. The right lies too.

 

[Meister]

Oh yeah, the left has Kangaroo Courts but the Right are all real ones, correct?

Is that why Trump got rid of Barr and now he placed Bondi in that role?

AI Overview

To understand the differences between Pam Bondi and William Barr regarding their experience and qualifications for the role of U.S. Attorney General, a review of their career histories is necessary. Both served as Attorney General, but they brought different legal backgrounds and career paths to the position.

Pam Bondi

Confirmed: February 2025

• Legal Experience: Served as a prosecutor in the Florida State Attorney's Office for 18 years, where she handled a wide range of cases, from domestic violence to homicide.
• Government Experience: Served two terms as the Attorney General of Florida (2011–2019), becoming the first woman to hold that office.
• Notable Florida Actions: Fought opioid abuse and human trafficking, and defended Florida's ban on same-sex marriage (prior to the Supreme Court ruling).
• Private and Post-AG Work: After leaving the Florida AG post, she worked as a lobbyist for firms like Ballard Partners, representing corporate and foreign interests. She also served on Donald Trump's legal defense team during his first impeachment trial in 2020.
• Relationship with Trump: Has a long and very close relationship with Donald Trump, openly supporting his claims of voter fraud in 2020 and acting as a vocal defender. Her loyalty to Trump has been a significant point of discussion and criticism.

William Barr

Confirmed: Twice, serving under President George H.W. Bush (1991–1993) and President Donald Trump (2019–2020).

• Legal Experience: Had an extensive career in government and corporate law. He served in the CIA, worked in the Reagan White House, and held senior positions at the Department of Justice, including Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel and Deputy Attorney General. Barr has never been a prosecutor in a courtroom setting.
• Corporate Experience: Spent 14 years working as general counsel and executive vice president for the telecommunications companies GTE and Verizon.
• Notable Actions as AG: As AG under George H.W. Bush, he oversaw the response to the Pan Am 103 bombing. In his second term under Trump, he received extensive criticism for his handling of the Mueller report and for intervening in cases involving Trump's associates.
• Relationship with Trump: Initially seen as a loyalist, Barr ultimately clashed with Trump. He resigned after contradicting Trump's claims of widespread fraud in the 2020 election, stating the Justice Department found no evidence to support them.

Not sure what the hell this is? AI?
Oh....yeah Kangaroo Court, that's what I was talking about.
It was real with the left, and their shenanigans, son.

 

[Rawley]

And you’ve seen all the documents?

The Grand Jury did. Enough to indict him.

 

[Rawley]

Excuse is YOUR word. Legally, what she supplied is evidence that the accusations were incorrect. Has that evidence (excuse in your words) been proven to be false?

Are you a judge (legally appointed), where you can make such determinations?

She didn't supply any evidence.

 

[Marener]

The Grand Jury did. Enough to indict him.

Letitia James has not been indicted.

Fun fact, there is no requirement to show the grand jury exculpatory evidence. DoJ policy is to present clearly exculpatory evidence but this administration doesn’t really give a shit about rules so it’s anyone’s guess as to whether they would do such a thing.

 

[Rawley]

Letitia James has not been indicted.

Comey was.

Fun fact, there is no requirement to show the grand jury exculpatory evidence. DoJ policy is to present clearly exculpatory evidence but this administration doesn’t really give a shit about rules so it’s anyone’s guess as to whether they would do such a thing.

LOL

 

[Luckyone]

She didn't supply any evidence.

Explain that statement in detail as to how what she supplied is not an answer to what she was accused if

 

[Luckyone]

Not sure what the hell this is? AI?
Oh....yeah Kangaroo Court, that's what I was talking about.
It was real with the left, and their shenanigans, son.

Prove that that were kangaroo courts, and if you can prove it, then show how the courts of the Right are not the same kind!