Zone1 Noah's Ark

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Because you are ignorant. Why wouldn't you want to know information? You don't have to agree. But, not to at least listen tells me you have crappy communication skills.

Every podcast contains information, dumbass.

Why should I click THAT one?

In case you are a bit slow on the uptake:

I am forcing you to make a point in your own words. But you can't. Youbl didnt listen to that podcast and don't have enough understanding of any of this to make any points in your own words, with evidence and argument.

And I am demonstrating this.

 

[Cougarbear]

Every podcast contains information, dumbass.

Why should I click THAT one?

In case you are a bit slow on the uptake:

I am forcing you to make a point in your own words. But you can't. Youbl didnt listen to that podcast and don't have enough understanding of any of this to make any points in your own words, with evidence and argument.

And I am demonstrating this.

Because you challenged me for proof. He's a geologist and therefore you should check it out. But, you won't because you are the dumbass. actually, as I've stated, you are the most ignorant one. Refusing to learn. Even some of the biggest atheists are willing to sit down with these people and listen and debate.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Because you challenged me for proof.

And you have none.

A link to a podcast doesn't qualify.

Summarize some argument and evidence of a global flood in your own words.

Like this:

"We know the global flood didnt happen simply because there is not enough water on earth to flood the earth."



And, go. See you in never.

 

[Cougarbear]

And you have none.

A link to a podcast doesn't qualify.

Summarize some argument and evidence of a global flood in your own words.

Like this:

"We know the global flood didnt happen simply because there is not enough water on earth to flood the earth."



And, go. See you in never.

It's a podcast giving geological evidence of the worldwide flood agreeing with Genesis. It therefore qualifies. You are just making a fool of yourself to everyone here. The ignorant one.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It's a podcast giving geological evidence of the worldwide flood agreeing with Genesis.

Like what evidence?

I'm not going to listen to a podcast you never listened to and search for the point you imagine you are making.

 

[Cougarbear]

Like what evidence?

I'm not going to listen to a podcast you never listened to and search for the point you imagine you are making.

You’ll have to listen. I did and have followed this for years. Ignorance is bliss.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You’ll have to listen. I did and have followed this for years. Ignorance is bliss.

No you didn't. You can't even summarize a single point from it. Not a single one.

With a simple question, the frauds are always exposed.

 

[Cougarbear]

No you didn't. You can't even summarize a single point from it. Not a single one.

With a simple question, the frauds are always exposed.

Why should I summarize anything when you have to listen and read it to learn. Atheists are so lazy. They won’t study anything and believe anything with only one side of a debate. Lazy!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why should I summarize anything

Because it shows you have an idea what you are talking about.

It shows you're not a pathetic troll that thinks he can link spam instead of make a point.

It shows you're not just wasting everyone's time.

And also because I know you didn't listen to the podcast, and I know you can't summarize a single point from it.

 

[Cougarbear]

Because it shows you have an idea what you are talking about.

It shows you're not a pathetic troll that thinks he can link spam instead of make a point.

It shows you're not just wasting everyone's time.

And also because I know you didn't listen to the podcast, and I know you can't summarize a single point from it.

Why should I write a 13 minute talk when you have ears to hear with? Until you listen to it I have won this debate.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why should I write a 13 minute talk when you have ears to hear with? Until you listen to it I have won this debate.

Nobody asked you to do that. This is not going to work for you.

You make an absurd and false claim that runs contrary to all the scientific evidenc3.

It is perfectly reasonable to expect you to summarize a bit of that evidence and argue why it is evidence.

But you won't. You will sit there and flail for 5 more pages and then leave the thread.

 

[Cougarbear]

Nobody asked you to do that. This is not going to work for you.

You make an absurd and false claim that runs contrary to all the scientific evidenc3.

It is perfectly reasonable to expect you to summarize a bit of that evidence and argue why it is evidence.

But you won't. You will sit there and flail for 5 more pages and then leave the thread.

Typical Democrat who doesn’t care about truth and facts. Just about dominance and when presented with losing refuses to acknowledge facts and truth. He becomes frightened of truth. Especially Godly truths.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Typical Democrat who doesn’t care about truth and facts. Just about dominance and when presented with losing refuses to acknowledge facts and truth. He becomes frightened of truth. Especially Godly truths.

Like I said...

Flail for 5 pages, leave the thread.

But no evidence or argument will be forthcoming.

Because there isn't any.

 

[Cougarbear]

Like I said...

Flail for 5 pages, leave the thread.

But no evidence or argument will be forthcoming.

Because there isn't any.

I gave you the evidence. But, like a good little Stalin, you refuse to look at the evidence. That's on you. I've won the debate. You lost.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I gave you the evidence

And therefore I gave you the evidence that shows your evidence is crap: the entirety of our body of science.

I guess I win pretty easily, right?

 

[Cougarbear]

And therefore I gave you the evidence that shows your evidence is crap: the entirety of our body of science.

I guess I win pretty easily, right?

You did not give me anything but lip flap. You must first listen and read what I presented to you and then you can explain why that is incorrect. But, just disagreeing without the work is lame and just like a Democrat.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You did not give me anything but lip flap

I literally linked you to about 1000000 scientific articles.

Not that you would even read one, if I linked it.

I am holding the mirror up right in front of your face.And still you don't see.

But anyhoo

If you would like to make a claim that something is a bit of the evidence you suggest exists, please do.

 

[Cougarbear]

I literally linked you to about 1000000 scientific articles.

Not that you would even read one, if I linked it.

I am holding the mirror up right in front of your face.And still you don't see.

But anyhoo

If you would like to make a claim that something is a bit of the evidence you suggest exists, please do.

Here's the difference. I've been reading your stuff, being taught by teachers in high school, JC college and universities for 55 years. I still read them as well. What I've done is also recognized that all of their writings are inconclusive as well. Their articles are full of fuzzy words that show they too aren't 100% convinced of their own conclusions. Scientists never say science is settled. Only Democrats. Republicans are open minded and will listen and read both sides of issues. Not Demorats.

 

[Woodznutz]

"We know the global flood didnt happen simply because there is not enough water on earth to flood the earth."

There's plenty enough water to flood the earth. Just raise the sea floor (fountains of the great deep) slightly and see what happens. Noah's flood didn't have to cover Mt. Everest in order to drown everyone. There was no one up there to drown.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

"We know the global flood didnt happen simply because there is not enough water on earth to flood the earth."

Fact check: The Bible's fountains of the deep... exist.​

Since the nineteenth century scientists said that the Great Flood could not have happened because the fountains of the great deep mentioned in Genesis do not exist. Well, it seems that they do...​

Fact check: The Bible's fountains of the deep... exist.

Since the nineteenth century scientists said that the Great Flood could not have happened because the fountains of the great deep mentioned in Genesis do not exist. Well, it seems that they do...

firstfactcheck.substack.com