elektra said:
Technically, it is those who take my money and give it others to buy
EV's
And oil companies get subsidies. Welcome to the club, hypocrite.
You are stating you belong to the club of hypocrites and are welcoming, me. Cardinal is that dumb!
And let us not ignore your lack of comprehension. I am speaking of EV's. Nobody received a subsidy, a tax credit, to buy those first Oldsmobiles.
We are also speaking of what you ignorantly think is a new technology, which receives subsidies at what you are calling it's infancy? Correct?
Show us where the Oil industry in 1855 received subsidies? 1865? 1900?
Show us where the government paid states to build gas stations.
Oil initially replaced whale oil used in lamps. Oil was naturally much more efficient. All the tax money, billions, if not trillions, which is proposed and being spent, is for inefficient, intermitten, green renewable energy. Green Energy, Renewable Energy is worst by a factor of 10,000 by what it claims it can replace.
Oil, unsubsidized, was cheaper and more efficient than what it replaced. You can not say that about Green Renewable energy.
And, I know you get really upset, sorry about bringing attention to your glaring error, I was speaking about EV's, not oil companies. Hence you should of drawn parallel to the early car industry, not oil companies.