No such thing as settled science or concensus

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So, which of you studying whether or not the earth revolves about the Sun?

Which of you is studying whether or not genes in a population change over time?

Ya know, since none of that is settled.

 

[EMH]

So, which of you studying whether or not the earth revolves about the Sun?

Which of you is studying whether or not genes in a population change over time?

Ya know, since none of that is settled.

LMFAO!!

There is no evidence of any change in Earth's orbit, at least for the past 65 million years.


As for the other subject

Thread 'Steroid use of the father is causing male kids to have lower testosterone levels'

Feb 16, 2026

RFKjr needs to focus, at some point, on steroids. A high school male wants big muscles, for sports, to attract women, to be big and tough etc. It is too tempting for someone that age to get suckered into going on steroids without understanding the consequences.

American male kids have lower testosterone now than in the past.

Why Are Men's Testosterone Levels Decreasing?

Odds are your grandad had higher testosterone levels than you — but why?

www.medichecks.com

Why...

• EMH
• Replies: 26
• Forum: Healthcare/Insurance/Govt Healthcare

• 

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There is no evidence of any change in Earth's orbit, at least for the past 65 million years.

So I guess that's settled then.

I do appreciate a good assistant. Thank you.

 

[EMH]

So I guess that's settled then.

I do appreciate a good assistant. Thank you.

"until acted on by external force"

who said that?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"until acted on by external force"

who said that?

Sorry, you're my assistant. Not the other way around.

 

[EMH]

Sorry, you're my assistant. Not the other way around.

You don't understand even basic science. You are just a left wing parrot and a science invalid.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You don't understand even basic science. You are just a left wing parrot and a science invalid.

Aww, poor little guy is having a tantrum, now. Yes, we know you think you outsmarted the entire scientific community by watching some YouTube videos.

Because you're a dumbass.

 

[EMH]

you think you outsmarted the entire scientific community

I have for 30 years, and you can't find a single source online that has my theory.

The FBI has had it since 2005...

Remind us again why homO went silent for two years...

Google Search

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I have for 30 years, and you can't find a single source online that has my theory.

A person whose brain isn't diarrhea might see a clue in there.

 

[EMH]

A person whose brain isn't diarrhea might see a clue in there.

A person with some science aptitude might have the intellectual courage to answer basic questions on the subject, but you don't, you're just a parrot...

Thread 'Any honest media person with the courage to actually ask climate questions?'

Feb 12, 2024

Apparently not.

Not on Faux

Not on RAV or OANN


What questions will the media never ask?


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



The Co2 Fraud is bilking America out of $200 billion per...

• EMH
• Replies: 92
• Forum: Media

• 
• 
• 

 

[jc456]

Uhm, News Flash:

Carbon Dioxide - Earth Indicator
Key Takeaway:
The amount of carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere has increased sharply in the past 100 years as measured from the ground and from satellites. Since carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, this increase has warmed the planet.

A t one time in your life, you did know about real science - right?

Will you be stopping breathing?

 

[fncceo]

We dont have to understand how it works.

See: Effective Theory

Jump off your roof today? You're trying to shiw its not settled science, remember. Your example of "manipulating gravity" doesnt do that.

When you can make accurate to the second predictions a century or more away with climate science, even if you don’t fully understand it’s workings, then I’m might believe you understand it to the point where it could be considered “settled”.

Get back to me when you can.

 

[Sunsettommy]

When you can make accurate to the second predictions a century or more away with climate science, even if you don’t fully understand it’s workings, then I’m might believe you understand it to the point where it could be considered “settled”.

Get back to me when you can.

He and other CO2 sniffers fails to realize those far into the future climate models fails the forecast skill test, thus worthless.

 

[skye]

 

[EMH]

He and other CO2 sniffers fails to realize those far into the future climate models fails the forecast skill test, thus worthless.

The climate forecast is actually incredibly easy if you understand what actually causes Earth climate change. If you are a faux skeptic obsessed with keeping CO2 FRAUD going, you simply ignore that truth because you know you can't refute a word of it.

 

[EMH]

When you can make accurate to the second predictions a century or more away with climate science, even if you don’t fully understand it’s workings, then I’m might believe you understand it to the point where it could be considered “settled”.

Get back to me when you can.

If DOJ would actually do something, it would be settled very quickly.

There is an overwhelmingly dominant variable and a clear and precise means of predicting increase or decrease....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

When you can make accurate to the second predictions a century or more away with climate science, even if you don’t fully understand it’s workings, then I’m might believe you understand it to the point where it could be considered “settled”.

That is a stupid, contrived standard. Nobody with good knowledge of the topic would make such a demand of the theory, and especially not one of a chaotic system.

First of all, that"s weather, not climate. "Predicting climate to the second" is an absurd phrase. Strike it from your vocabulary immediately, so you don't get laughed out of a room of educated, informed people.

Second, climate is a chaotic system. This is why running means are used to measure it. This is why climate predictions are predictions of running means. The data is noisy. However, trends still emerge.

Maybe try sticking a fork in your electrical outlet, to see if electromagnetic theory is settled.

Or you are free to pour money into studies searching for a different reason for the observed, rapid warming of our climate. There is a reason nobody is doing this any longer. And if calling it "settled" makes you uncomfortable, that's a YOU problem. Replace the word with something that doesn't make you squirm, if you want.

 

[EMH]

climate is a chaotic system

WRONG - weather is chaotic, climate is systemic, defines the parameters of weather

The data is noisy

All CO2 FRAUD science invalid morons like you don't understand the difference between data and FUDGE....

 

[BS Filter]

I remember when I was in school in 1960 they taught us about finding a bone from a human a million years ago. It was later determined to be a bone from a pig. Anyone saying "settled science" is stupid and brainwashed.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I remember when I was in school in 1960 they taught us about finding a bone from a human a million years ago. It was later determined to be a bone from a pig. Anyone saying "settled science" is stupid and brainwashed.

.

It is the nature of science to always be changing.

.