'No Separation Of Church And State': Trump's Religious Liberty Commission Reveals Its Priorities

[80zephyr]

By demanding display of the Ten Commandments and public prayer

And on the flip side, not allowing these things would be against practicing religion freely.

 

[80zephyr]

Neither is there a mandate by the framers.

There is a mandate for freedom of religion.

 

[80zephyr]

It is.

So some practicing of religion is forbidden? Where is that in the Constitution?

 

[jacksonlamb]

So they are the ones that actually wrote it, yet they didn't understand what they themselves had written?

Lol.

Yes, that the did not want organized religion and religious test oaths, etc., making government miserable for people.

 

[jacksonlamb]

So some practicing of religion is forbidden? Where is that in the Constitution?

No religious test oaths for one.

 

[80zephyr]

Yes, that the did not want organized religion and religious test oaths, etc., making government miserable for people.

But they allowed the practice of religion.

 

[jacksonlamb]

But they allowed the practice of religion.

No, the allowed the belief in religion, and qualified the practice of religion that it met the civil law.

Just like they require sharia law to do so in America.

 

[WEATHER53]

No religious test oaths for one.

Which is vastly different than having the option to pray or see a nativity scene

 

[Superbadbrutha]

A demklan voter who supports segregation and racism gerrymandering calling others racist is hilarious

I told you, your posts get dumber and dumber. Now you are a white woman cheering for the SC allowing Southern racist the right to gerrymander black districts which weakens our voting.

Roger Taney another Dem, whose opinions weee overturned by the gop

He would be a Republican today, the mindset he had is the same as the members who legalized racial gerrymandering today.

She’s the front runner cause she’s got the most support, now that your Dem segregation district have been ruled illegal

Who does she have support from? Did she have the support from black folks before republicans racially gerrymandered the district? Let's see if your lying ass will answer honestly, I doubt it.

Sen. London Lamar, a Democrat from Memphis.
“You cannot take a majority Black city, fracture its voting power and then tell us race has nothing to do with it,” she said.

Yes that’s the sort of thing a racist Dem would say about black folk.

That would be the ones who don't identify with black folks, remember I said, "all skinfolk, ain't kinfolk". Which would include you.....oh wait never mind you are a white woman.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Extremely racist and wallowing in 175 years ago. Try and dig up some 1777 info and Pearl clutch to the fainting couch oh faint one

You mean dealing with a SC, administration and Congress that is extremely racist. I don't need to do that; Republicans today have the same mindset as racist of 1777.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Mathematically, they should never be elected, except in rare instances. Good thing for you it doesn't work that way. Look at Obama as an example.

Where have you been? They control the WH, the Congress and the Supreme Court.

 

[struth]

I told you, your posts get dumber and dumber. Now you are a white woman cheering for the SC allowing Southern racist the right to gerrymander black districts which weakens our voting.

He would be a Republican today, the mindset he had is the same as the members who legalized racial gerrymandering today.

Who does she have support from? Did she have the support from black folks before republicans racially gerrymandered the district? Let's see if your lying ass will answer honestly, I doubt it.

Sen. London Lamar, a Democrat from Memphis.
“You cannot take a majority Black city, fracture its voting power and then tell us race has nothing to do with it,” she said.

That would be the ones who don't identify with black folks, remember I said, "all skinfolk, ain't kinfolk". Which would include you.....oh wait never mind you are a white woman.

1) I’m a white woman? You’re losing it
2) nope, you are actually arguing much if his views…segregation
3) voters
4) of course race has something to do with it, you demklaners racial gerrymadeeed to create black districts. It’s illegal to racially gwrrmander

 

[struth]

You mean dealing with a SC, administration and Congress that is extremely racist. I don't need to do that; Republicans today have the same mindset as racist of 1777.

Congresswoman Charlotte!

Get used ti saying her name you little demklansman!

Your old white dick is going home!

 

[Robert W]

‘One member calls for a Presidential Medal of Freedom for a baker who refused to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.

Imagine homosexual bakers who refused to bake cakes for Nazis. Do you believe they should have baked cakes for Nazis?

 

[struth]

Imagine homosexual bakers who refused to bake cakes for Nazis. Do you believe they should have baked cakes for Nazis?

Nazis are pretty gay…so…

 

[Robert W]

and abandon the Framers’ mandate that church and state remain separate.

State does not establish religion.
Religion (see Iran and Italy) has created states.

There is only bad when states create religion.

 

[Robert W]

Hmmm, but he didn't believe the creator gave the black folks whom they held in slavery those same rights.

Slavery was an occupation and Democrats truly appreciated it, then and now.

 

[d0gbreath]

Nothing surprises me anymore. Stick our president at the pulpit in front of a congregation. I'm beyond caring.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Madeline O Hare who was so bad the sons she used as pawns murdered her

I know she was killed, but I thought one of her sons was also killed.

Seems like I recall people in the organization (felons, who'd guessed?) did the dirty dead. It was all over money.

 

[HikerGuy83]

THAT is idiotic!!!

Furthermore , they did not just teach religion....they taught Christianity as fact to the exclusion of all other religions...that is where they ran afoul of the constitution . Deal with it.

AND , your opinion is damned sure not law either

All the colonies had established religions (one specfic religion) prior to the constitution. They maintained those religions and finanical support for many of them....some through the 1830's and they were never challenged in court.

So, no.....the only idiot or ignoramus in this case is you.

That's not opinion. That's what happened.