Like I said two pages back...
Being gay in the 70s meant having fewer rights than others and often times living a secretive life. What you don't like are gay people being themselves out in the open. That's your problem to deal with, not homosexuals.
Being out in the open being gay is not the same thing as stripping children of their erstwhile right to both a mother and father from the marriage contract. When gay's sexual lives strip children of contractual necessities, for life, then their lifestyle must be called up short. "This far and no farther". **** who you want, when you want, but you can't call it married. We tell this to incest people. We tell it to polygamists. We tell it to gays. And we tell it to these groups of sexual orientations as a whole because and directly because of the children involved...
******
A sexual lifestyle such as incest, gay or polygamy doesn't make "legal rights" that states can't defend children against.. States should really look into New York vs Ferber:
Is Gay Marriage Void? New York v Ferber (1982) Etc.
We don't "tell it to gays" they are legally able to get married, regardless of your confused opinions.
So there you have it, all sexual orientations may marry, polyamorists, incest and gay...to hell with the children! Not all you say? Why not? (Cite the 14th Amendment in your answer..)