No food stamps for any family of a striking worker

The big problem with that is that if the unions use money to support strikers, then there is much less to donate to the Democrats during campaign season.



aaaaawwwww.


Well, you know, that is the Big Purpose for unions these days...to launder taxpayer money for the DNC.


That is the ONLY purpose for unions. To make war chest of money to elect in who ever the politician is that will give them the most power.

The unions don't give a rats ass about their membership. If they did, they would be paying all of their bills, rent or mortgage and money for food of any lazy member they had on strike. .
 
If TMN could read English, she would realize that that is not what I said.

We have labor laws that sufficiently cover work hours and working conditions. The only thing left for unions to do is to ask for More and More (cf, the Gompers' quote in my signature).
Unions deal with more than wages and you know it.
And the corps only care about profits.

Why do you think the worker should not care about their own profits?

Why is one good and the other is not?

OK....you made a statement...now back it up.

Name one thing unions do that are not compensation related.

If you answer my question THEN I will answer yours
 
People can unionize as much as they want; they have freedom of association.

They do not have the right to force employers into collective bargaining agreements.

TMN can't tell the difference between the two.
 
Last edited:
Maybe you dont know what collective bargaining is?

tell your definition off the top of your head?
 
Maybe you dont know what collective bargaining is?

tell your definition off the top of your head?


You first, hun. You've never posted anything factual "off the top of your head". Give it a shot.
 
ThinkProgress » Buried Provision In House GOP Bill Would Cut Off Food Stamps To Entire Families If One Member Strikes


Want to talk about class warfare?

The republicans in congress have written into a bill a provision that anyone related to a striking worker will have their food stamps taken away.

So a single Mom can have her food stamps taken away for trying to strike for enough pay to get off of food stamps.


The right is full on against ANY workers rights.

Why do they hate the vast majority of Americans?

So you are implying that with out striking they are not making enough and need food stamps? Yeah right. lol.
 
ThinkProgress » Buried Provision In House GOP Bill Would Cut Off Food Stamps To Entire Families If One Member Strikes


Want to talk about class warfare?

The republicans in congress have written into a bill a provision that anyone related to a striking worker will have their food stamps taken away.

So a single Mom can have her food stamps taken away for trying to strike for enough pay to get off of food stamps.


The right is full on against ANY workers rights.

Why do they hate the vast majority of Americans?

So you are implying that with out striking they are not making enough and need food stamps? Yeah right. lol.

Working poor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
15th post
Maybe you dont know what collective bargaining is?

tell your definition off the top of your head?


You first, hun. You've never posted anything factual "off the top of your head". Give it a shot.

You dont know do you?


Its what unions do you silly goose.

They negociate the collective interests of workers.

You are trying to say unions can ban together but have no power.
 
So tell me how does a union have ANY power without collective bargaining?


You are the one suggesting it should be illegal.
 
Back
Top Bottom