"No collusion......No obstruction......Completely cleared"?????

[Siete]

Most people understand Trump is guilty. But you can't charge a sitting president. Mueller was kind to Trump. You cons should be kissing his ass.

he left it to Congress and they farted around too long -

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

We have a, so called, president who can be and will be indicted on two Felonies..

1. Conspiracy to conduct Federal Campaign Election violation


And

2. Multiple counts of Obstruction of Justice

This is the tip.of the Iceberg. trump is a criminal in the White House

1. Conspiracy to conduct Federal Campaign Election violation

Beating Hillary's corrupt ass isn't any sort of violation.

 

[ph3iron]

4 investigations, 4mil docs, 500 witness, 1000 FBI over 3 years. DJT cooperated with enough harrassment, people spent fortunes.

It's finished Jake. There is no there there.

Don't you know the study made money.?
Heard of manifol and Cohen and Russian indictments?
Tax returns?
Why did the con prevent everybody he could from testifying?

 

[ph3iron]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

We have a, so called, president who can be and will be indicted on two Felonies..

1. Conspiracy to conduct Federal Campaign Election violation


And

2. Multiple counts of Obstruction of Justice

This is the tip.of the Iceberg. trump is a criminal in the White House

1. Conspiracy to conduct Federal Campaign Election violation

Beating Hillary's corrupt ass isn't any sort of violation.

Why haven't legal experts like you had her in jail the last 40 years?
And where is she and where are you again?
Dumb clown make up?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

We have a, so called, president who can be and will be indicted on two Felonies..

1. Conspiracy to conduct Federal Campaign Election violation


And

2. Multiple counts of Obstruction of Justice

This is the tip.of the Iceberg. trump is a criminal in the White House

1. Conspiracy to conduct Federal Campaign Election violation

Beating Hillary's corrupt ass isn't any sort of violation.

Why haven't legal experts like you had her in jail the last 40 years?
And where is she and where are you again?
Dumb clown make up?

She's face down in a puddle of her own vodka infused vomit.

 

[sealybobo]

Most people understand Trump is guilty. But you can't charge a sitting president. Mueller was kind to Trump. You cons should be kissing his ass.

Robert Mueller did nothing but cover his own ass! He made several references to ongoing DOJ and FBI investigation. To testify about anything he knows could be considered a crime even under oath. His testimony was very disingenuous.

This is what I got out of it

No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

 

[theHawk]

Pages 227 to 368 of the Mueller report cover a minimum of 10 instances in which Trump & Trump associates directed by Trump made attempts to obstruct the investigation.

Mueller agreed with the DOJ OLC assessment that a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted.

If Trump were not POTUS he would have already faced multiple indictments for obstruction.

Trump, Barr, the GOP Nazis, etc., none of these folk want Americans to understand these truths so, they are making desperate attempts to hide these truths from the people by insisting that, "it's over."

Congress has a duty to perform under The Constitution; impeachment of Trump for his abuses of power is the only solution.

Mueller was asked if any Trump staff hindered the investigation.

He said, “no”.

It’s over. Move on.

 

[sealybobo]

Pages 227 to 368 of the Mueller report cover a minimum of 10 instances in which Trump & Trump associates directed by Trump made attempts to obstruct the investigation.

Mueller agreed with the DOJ OLC assessment that a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted.

If Trump were not POTUS he would have already faced multiple indictments for obstruction.

Trump, Barr, the GOP Nazis, etc., none of these folk want Americans to understand these truths so, they are making desperate attempts to hide these truths from the people by insisting that, "it's over."

Congress has a duty to perform under The Constitution; impeachment of Trump for his abuses of power is the only solution.

Mueller was asked if any Trump staff hindered the investigation.

He said, “no”.

It’s over. Move on.

I don't recall that.

Robert Mueller told Congress on Wednesday that his investigation did not exonerate President Donald Trump of wrongdoing

...using his frequently short answers during back-to-back appearance before the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees to confirm a number of damaging facts contained in the report he completed this spring.

Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., asked the former special counsel if his investigation had indeed cleared Trump, as the president has often claimed.

"No," Mueller answered flatly.

The former special counsel, who testified under oath, also detailed why his team didn't decide one way or another whether Trump could be criminally charged, despite some evidence that the White House might have attempted to obstruct the investigation.

"Based on Justice Department policy and principles of fairness, we decided we would not make a determination as to whether the president committed a crime," Mueller said, referring to the longstanding policy set by the department's Office of Legal Counsel against indicting a sitting president.

"Among the most shocking of these incidents (in Mueller's report), President Trump ordered his White House counsel to have you fired and then to lie and deny that it ever happened; he ordered his former campaign manager to convince the recused attorney general to step in and limit your work; and he attempted to prevent witnesses from cooperating with your investigation," Nadler said.

"Although department policy barred you from indicting the president for this conduct, you made clear that he is not exonerated," Nadler added. "Any other person who acted this way would have been charged with a crime. And in this nation, not even the president is above the law."

Under questioning from Rep. Cedric Richmond, D-La., Mueller agreed that it was "correct" to say that Trump asked former White House Counsel Don McGahn to misrepresent facts to defend the president.

"So it's fair to say the president tried to protect himself by asking staff to falsify records relevant to an ongoing investigation?" Richmond asked.

"I would say that's generally the summary," Mueller agreed.

 

[Crixus]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

1. Trump was trying to help the doddering old **** out. Muller pretty much torpedoed all your impeachment hopes and wet dreams. Damn, even Bob Bar tried to save him!

2. You already answered that question. 30 hours of testimony and they want 30 more? That just isn't done. No democrat president would have done that and I doubt any other republican president would. Just a dumb ******* question.

3. Same as number two, and an equally stupid question.

 

[WillPower]

4 investigations, 4mil docs, 500 witness, 1000 FBI over 3 years. DJT cooperated with enough harrassment, people spent fortunes.

It's finished Jake. There is no there there.

It's Chinatown, Jake.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The OP is an illogical idiot. His entire premise is a lie.

 

[Rambunctious]

 

[Third Party]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

Yes, they are now investigating Democrats

 

[WEATHER53]

Cleared in the report and by the sad spectacle.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

We have a, so called, president who can be and will be indicted on two Felonies..

1. Conspiracy to conduct Federal Campaign Election violation


And

2. Multiple counts of Obstruction of Justice

This is the tip.of the Iceberg. trump is a criminal in the White House

He's still your president and will be until 2025

I was thinking at least until 2030.

Sorry I can't take all that winning nor the whining from the leftist lol

Idiots

February's Budget Deficit Was the Largest in American History

Why didn't Republicans tell us the truth that they don't give a **** about the debt?

Yawn it gets bore when you know leftist are lying. So all you can do is mock them

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

Yes, they are now investigating Democrats

Yep I predict is going to be one of those i-told-you-so moments

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

No, there was no evidence. No, there was no collusion, no, there was no obstruction. Keep yearning and wringing those little fingers in desperation.

 

[Dale Smith]

The Mueller report the libs valued So Highly is completed. It was not the outcome they wanted so now they want an extension or re-do. None is forthcoming so time to make up another whopper and drive that until it’s dead.

I guess you don't believe t

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Yesterday was a disaster for leftards. No amount of spin can fix it.

leftards, dead giveaway for
Zero college white boy. Kindergarten insult.
Guess you don't like Purple Heart repubs.
He made all the salient points
Contradicted trump , says report does NOT exonerate trump
I can't believe you read the report?

I have a degree and I make TWICE what the median income is for the middle class . I am in the upper 20 percent income earners. Don't EVEN try and sell me on leftard love for Herr Mueller when he was considered a water carrier for the Bushpuppet crime family and was complicit in covering up the 9/11/01 false false flag event...and if you haven't learned by now that it wasn't muslim extremists that attacked that day? You are beyond ******* STOOOOPID. If you don't know that Mueller was the back pocket boy for the CIA friendly banks of BCCI and HSBC, you are too ******* stupid and ignorant to converse with me.

In summation? I simply know and comprehend more than you.....by a factor of a thousand if not more. So, waddle away little fat boy........

 

[ph3iron]

The Mueller report the libs valued So Highly is completed. It was not the outcome they wanted so now they want an extension or re-do. None is forthcoming so time to make up another whopper and drive that until it’s dead.

I guess you don't believe t

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Yesterday was a disaster for leftards. No amount of spin can fix it.

leftards, dead giveaway for
Zero college white boy. Kindergarten insult.
Guess you don't like Purple Heart repubs.
He made all the salient points
Contradicted trump , says report does NOT exonerate trump
I can't believe you read the report?

I have a degree and I make TWICE what the median income is for the middle class . I am in the upper 20 percent income earners. Don't EVEN try and sell me on leftard love for Herr Mueller when he was considered a water carrier for the Bushpuppet crime family and was complicit in covering up the 9/11/01 false false flag event...and if you haven't learned by now that it wasn't muslim extremists that attacked that day? You are beyond ******* STOOOOPID. If you don't know that Mueller was the back pocket boy for the CIA friendly banks of BCCI and HSBC, you are too ******* stupid and ignorant to converse with me.

In summation? I simply know and comprehend more than you.....by a factor of a thousand if not more. So, waddle away little fat boy........

Nice foul mouth and SO intelligent he knows how much others know
Trump u?
So you did read all 448 pages?
Btw, I'm worth 1000 times more than the median. Corporate guy, never voted for a dem in my life

 

[Dale Smith]

The Mueller report the libs valued So Highly is completed. It was not the outcome they wanted so now they want an extension or re-do. None is forthcoming so time to make up another whopper and drive that until it’s dead.

I guess you don't believe t

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Yesterday was a disaster for leftards. No amount of spin can fix it.

leftards, dead giveaway for
Zero college white boy. Kindergarten insult.
Guess you don't like Purple Heart repubs.
He made all the salient points
Contradicted trump , says report does NOT exonerate trump
I can't believe you read the report?

I have a degree and I make TWICE what the median income is for the middle class . I am in the upper 20 percent income earners. Don't EVEN try and sell me on leftard love for Herr Mueller when he was considered a water carrier for the Bushpuppet crime family and was complicit in covering up the 9/11/01 false false flag event...and if you haven't learned by now that it wasn't muslim extremists that attacked that day? You are beyond ******* STOOOOPID. If you don't know that Mueller was the back pocket boy for the CIA friendly banks of BCCI and HSBC, you are too ******* stupid and ignorant to converse with me.

In summation? I simply know and comprehend more than you.....by a factor of a thousand if not more. So, waddle away little fat boy........

Nice foul mouth and SO intelligent he knows how much others know
Trump u?
So you did read all 448 pages?
Btw, I'm worth 1000 times more than the median. Corporate guy, never voted for a dem in my life

Bully for you, dipshit.....do you want a cigar or a blowtorch to light it with?