"No collusion......No obstruction......Completely cleared"?????

[kyzr]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

One of my take-aways was the glaring difference in what constitutes "obstruction".
Mueller and the democrats have a wacky "thought crime" definition that they cling to.

Barr, the DOJ, and Professor Dershowitz have a very different definition.
Dershowitz: Mueller got the law 'all wrong' on obstruction of justice

One GOP congressman tried to explain it, so maybe if the dems impeach Trump they will learn what "obstruction" really is?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

"Exoneration" is a BS Imaginary standard! We can't exonerate Mueller in his role as Whitey Bulgers Fluffer and Wingman either

See how that works?

I warned you fuckers many, many, many times about going after Trump like this.

Here's what in your, that is, the Communist democrat Party's immediate future:

FisaGate
PedoGate
Illegal Immigrant Child Trafficking Gate

You tried to kill the King and missed -- by a Lot too

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

It was clear that not only did Mueller not write a single word in "the Mueller Report", he never bothered to read it!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Quite frankly I find his style of leadership - aggressive, forceful, calls out scumbags daily - quite refreshing. Definately a leadership style not for sissies, therefore, I can certainly understand your frustration.

In other words, you want a big-mouth bully for "president"......A bully with a big mouth who cowers before Putin and Kim Jung Un because they're even better at being despots......and a bully whose father bought his Vietnam deferment over "bone spurs."

Stay with Trump, dimwit......He very much NEEDS the poorly educated to stick by him and his CULT membership and drink the kool-aid into the delusional la-la land.

Poor Jake

2 1/2 years later and obstructing Hillary from the White House is STILL not a crime

 

[JimH52]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

We have a, so called, president who can be and will be indicted on two Felonies..

1. Conspiracy to conduct Federal Campaign Election violation


And

2. Multiple counts of Obstruction of Justice

This is the tip.of the Iceberg. trump is a criminal in the White House

 

[Oddball]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

We have a, so called, president who can be and will be indicted on two Felonies..

1. Conspiracy to conduct Federal Campaign Election violation


And

2. Multiple counts of Obstruction of Justice

This is the tip.of the Iceberg. trump is a criminal in the White House

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

ok you started off with a lie Trump never claimed executive privilege

 

[The Original Tree]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

We have a, so called, president who can be and will be indicted on two Felonies..

1. Conspiracy to conduct Federal Campaign Election violation


And

2. Multiple counts of Obstruction of Justice

This is the tip.of the Iceberg. trump is a criminal in the White House

Obstruction? Yes, definitely that occurred.

I was all bound up until I started taking a glass of Metamucil every night before going to bed.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

We have a, so called, president who can be and will be indicted on two Felonies..

1. Conspiracy to conduct Federal Campaign Election violation


And

2. Multiple counts of Obstruction of Justice

This is the tip.of the Iceberg. trump is a criminal in the White House

He's still your president and will be until 2025

 

[The Original Tree]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

"Exoneration" is a BS Imaginary standard! We can't exonerate Mueller in his role as Whitey Bulgers Fluffer and Wingman either

See how that works?

I warned you fuckers many, many, many times about going after Trump like this.

Here's what in your, that is, the Communist democrat Party's immediate future:

FisaGate
PedoGate
Illegal Immigrant Child Trafficking Gate

You tried to kill the King and missed -- by a Lot too

Same with the fictitious standard Comey created out of thin air to let Clinton out of multiple felonies.

 

[The Original Tree]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

We have a, so called, president who can be and will be indicted on two Felonies..

1. Conspiracy to conduct Federal Campaign Election violation


And

2. Multiple counts of Obstruction of Justice

This is the tip.of the Iceberg. trump is a criminal in the White House

He's still your president and will be until 2025

I was thinking at least until 2030.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

We have a, so called, president who can be and will be indicted on two Felonies..

1. Conspiracy to conduct Federal Campaign Election violation


And

2. Multiple counts of Obstruction of Justice

This is the tip.of the Iceberg. trump is a criminal in the White House

FisaGate
PedoGate

No more democrat Party

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

We have a, so called, president who can be and will be indicted on two Felonies..

1. Conspiracy to conduct Federal Campaign Election violation


And

2. Multiple counts of Obstruction of Justice

This is the tip.of the Iceberg. trump is a criminal in the White House

He's still your president and will be until 2025

I was thinking at least until 2030.

Sorry I can't take all that winning nor the whining from the leftist lol

 

[Siete]

To Congress;

Fuck you, and your subpoenas
I'm suing you.
I can't remember the answer to your question.

Thats not obstruction because I exonerated myself.

D. Trump, not guilty.

 

[Norman]

To Congress;

Fuck you, and your subpoenas
I'm suing you.
I can't remember the answer to your question.

Thats not obstruction because I exonerated myself.

D. Trump, not guilty.

Any minute now... any minute now...

But do remember to place the order for the TDS meds, just in case.

 

[Siete]

To Congress;

Fuck you, and your subpoenas
I'm suing you.
I can't remember the answer to your question.

Thats not obstruction because I exonerated myself.

D. Trump, not guilty.

Any minute now... any minute now...

But do remember to place the order for the TDS meds, just in case.

DTS in your case -

 

[lennypartiv]

WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

Admit you lost. Trump was exonerated. And you Democrats have no business sticking your nose in Trump's private tax returns.

 

[Indeependent]

To Congress;

Fuck you, and your subpoenas
I'm suing you.
I can't remember the answer to your question.

Thats not obstruction because I exonerated myself.

D. Trump, not guilty.

DailyKOS...
They’re waiting for you.

 

[lennypartiv]

asking a democrat to stop attacking Trump & work for the good of the country is like asking a catholic to renounce the trinity!

Dems are attacking Trump non stop. Now they want his private tax returns and private bank statements. Can you say witch hunt?

 

[The Original Tree]

To Congress;

Fuck you, and your subpoenas
I'm suing you.
I can't remember the answer to your question.

Thats not obstruction because I exonerated myself.

D. Trump, not guilty.

When asked if Mueller thought there was obstruction he replied:

Not any more. I drink a glass of Metamucil before I go to bed.